1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Unigine Benchmark Compilation

Discussion in 'General Software' started by Binge, Jan 16, 2010.

  1. Krony

    Krony New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    288 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    England
    I did about 6 posts above but u seem to have missed it so i posed the screen again :p

    here: Krony|Evga GTX 580 SC|890/1038|1892|Intel i7 950 4.2GHz

    [​IMG]
  2. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,981 (3.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    It's not about the screen. You must fill out the text with the screenshot. You can ALWAYS edit a post to add the text required to make a valid post.
  3. Krony

    Krony New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    288 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    England
    I did in Post #456 but it was missed :p
    thx anyway
  4. trickson

    trickson OH, I have such a headache

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,494 (1.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Planet Earth.
    I don't know about you all but I think this benchmark falls short of a lot of things . Not a very impressive program . DX10 is way faster than the DX11 and looks better too . I get way different scores each time I use it . Not to bitch about this one but I think this benchmark is bad . At least it seems this way to me . Not going to use this one any more .
  5. Krony

    Krony New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    288 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    England
    I seem to get the same scores each time with the same setup.
    And DX11 looks far better than DX10 and is alot more demanding.
  6. trickson

    trickson OH, I have such a headache

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,494 (1.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Planet Earth.
    meh . I just don't see it . I do see what I see and it is inconsistent and fluctuates too much for my taste .
  7. Krony

    Krony New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    288 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    England
    Bump :)
  8. fullinfusion

    fullinfusion 1.21 Gigawatts

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2008
    Messages:
    7,983 (3.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,865
    Get a 6 series gpu on newest green card, then you'll see the difference. ;)

    All I must say is BOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooo to Binge for having the screen resolution so low... my gpu looks like crap lol but what ever :roll:
  9. jmcslob

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2009
    Messages:
    2,882 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    447
    Location:
    Internet Heaven
    WOW I'm getting 1300 in UNiGiNe I'll try a slight OC and edit this post
  10. claylomax

    claylomax

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,585 (1.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    255
    Location:
    London
    Can we use the latest version 2.5?
  11. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    Heaven DX11
    rickss69|Sapphire 5970|975/1200|2100|Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz

    Heaven DX10
    rickss69|Sapphire 5970|975/1200|3922|Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz

    Tropics DX10
    rickss69|Sapphire 5970|975/1200|3902|Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz

    Tropics DX9
    rickss69|Sapphire 5970|975/1200|5233|Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz

    Sanctuary DX10
    rickss69|Sapphire 5970|975/1200|12521|Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz

    Sanctuary DX9
    rickss69|Sapphire 5970|975/1200|15213|Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz

    Attached Files:

  12. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    Just for giggles...all settings max/extreme :

    Attached Files:

  13. 20mmrain

    20mmrain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,765 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    824
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    [​IMG]

    Without really pushing my setup i7 860 only @ 3.8 and Cards at Stock. If I pushed it I know I could possibly make 95+ FPS But will redo once I finish my water cooling setup on my cards.


    Oh yeah and PS.... I can see how those SB CPU's really help out some benching scores.... Man O Man I need to get me one of those!!!! Nice run RickSS

    Attached Files:

    Last edited: Mar 7, 2011
    rickss69 says thanks.
  14. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    Seems everyone is using a different version of the benchmark now...is 2.0 not the standard still? :confused:
  15. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,419 (3.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,507
    Crunching for Team TPU
  16. Krony

    Krony New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2008
    Messages:
    288 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Location:
    England
    I think 2.5 is more buggy, so i would suggest just stick with 2.1
  17. 20mmrain

    20mmrain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,765 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    824
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    Ahhh... I noticed that too late....

    also I noticed I said 95+ FPS I meant to say after some overclocking 90+ Just for my own Accuracy :)

    I will have to redo the Benches with the version you guys have.

    I haven't compared the scores.... but it seems at least on my end 2.5 runs way smoother for me then 2.1 did. Especially around the area where you are entering that stone hallway. On 2.1 is stuttered like know ones business and in 2.5 it runs smooth.

    But comparing the fact that 2x6950's should beat 1x5970 even overclocked at moderate speeds (Unless RickSS i7 2600k is making that much of a difference) .... maybe there is a edge with scores on the older version. Just a thought....going on reports from across the net.

    After thought.... Also another idea.... another reason for me thinking this is that the 6900 series is supposed to be soupier to the 5000 series in tessellation.
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2011
  18. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    Try version 2.0 for comparison Rain.
  19. 20mmrain

    20mmrain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,765 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    824
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    Will Do a little bit later and will post my results.... right now I got to play Dad and call in my sick daughter to school :( Will report back later this morning for comparison.

    Scratch that downloading now..... Report back real soon....Slow download speed of this version still waiting..... Will be here though.
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2011
  20. 20mmrain

    20mmrain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,765 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    824
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    Well I guess there is a difference.....You will see a large Frame Rate Drop down to 9 FPS but thats what I meant by not as smooth as the other versions..... but I also got a huge score increase over 2.5. If I didn't get that frame rate drop though.... I would have had way over 95 FPS and possibly even 100 FPS. Before that stutter... I was at a Frame rate of 98 FPS then after that drop for a split second to 9 FPS.... I had to work my way back from 88FPS.... it was a quick blink of an eye. If you ask me even though the scores are lower in 2.5 I still think we should use it as it is a more stable version. But that's just My opinion.

    Here's the pic....

    Old Score with 2.5 Much more stable FPS no drops.... But lower score...
    [​IMG]

    New Score ... Much Much higher.... But also less stable in terms of FPS drops all over the place.... quick research for Nvidia and ATI
    [​IMG]

    Attached Files:

  21. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    There needs to be another thread started for the new version. Introducing it here now would nullify all previous scores for comparison.
  22. 20mmrain

    20mmrain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,765 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    824
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    Yeah I suppose your right.... If you haven't done it.... I will.
  23. trickson

    trickson OH, I have such a headache

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,494 (1.85/day)
    Thanks Received:
    956
    Location:
    Planet Earth.
    I agree . need a new thread for the new test .
  24. 20mmrain

    20mmrain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,765 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    824
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    trickson says thanks.
  25. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    Heaven DX11
    rickss69|Diamond 5850|1030/1250|1110|Intel i7 2600K @ 4.5GHz

    Attached Files:

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page