1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Unigine Benchmark Compilation

Discussion in 'General Software' started by Binge, Jan 16, 2010.

  1. TAViX Guest

    Hey guys. Here is my score:

    TAViX | Gigabyte HD 5870 | 970core/1250RAM | 1050 | Core 2 Quad Q9650 @4.2GHz

    [​IMG]
  2. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    [​IMG]

    BiNGE|Sapphire 5850|1030/1250|1059|i7 920@4.2GHz

    TAV, your score is a little on the strong side. If you know anyone else with a 5870, or if anyone else on TPU could retest with the 10.1 drivers with comparable clocks then I would appreciate the comparison. If your score turns out to match like results with the same drivers then it will be stay, and if not it will be removed.
  3. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    I can give it a try Binge
    Binge says thanks.
  4. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    wolf|Sapphire 5870|960/1250|1027|i7 920@4.2Ghz

    ran driver sweeper and installed cat 10.1

    [​IMG]
    Binge says thanks.
  5. InTeL-iNsIdE Guest

    just a little bit more proof that 5770's kick it and beat out single 5850's and 5870's consistently

    InTeL-iNsIdE|Sapphire 5770's x2|920/1325|1145|i7 920@4.2Ghz

    That puts me above all the ati 5850/5870 single card dx11 runs, not too mention my 3d06 score beats all 5850/5870 single results also :toast:

    [​IMG]

    Attached Files:

  6. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    In engines that scale well, like this, or SF4, or DMC4 for example it's obvious the 5770's are faster in straight line speed, benchmarks are well known for scaling GPU's as much as possible.

    I still disagree that they beat out a 58xx card consistently given the vast array of games and applications that use GPU's, not to mention my points about two slots, so you can't add power to your setup later.

    You could show me dozens of benchmark runs and in game FPS scores and I still disagree based on personal experience, where falling back on single card FPS (ie lower min fps than a single more powerful card) is an inevitability. The score might look better, but the gaming experience could be worse, not always, but it happens a whole lot depending on what you play.

    In short, I concede to you that your 5770's bench faster/show higher numbers than a 58xx card, but I stand by a 58xx card being better for a gamer.
  7. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    It puts you in the dual GPU bracket too! UPDATED!
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2010
  8. InTeL-iNsIdE Guest

    Yea I guess your right, I mean all the reviews that say they do not just in benches but also in games and my own testing must be a coverup :laugh:

    Yes its a dual gpu setup and yes some people experience issues with dual gpu setups, I agree, however when done right and its working then the benefits are easy to see, and there are little/none scaling issues with any modern games, or at least that I have come across anyway.

    Ok ok a single gpu solution is the best option because of those issues which can arise with dual gpu setups and also power consumption wise, though I would hazard 2 5770's use little more power than a single 5870.

    Point is if you can get better/equal performance with a dual gpu setup for cheaper, which I did in my case, not too mention 5850's and 5870's were harder to get hold of, then it is worth it, crossfire and SLI have come a long way :toast:
  9. somebody

    somebody New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2009
    Messages:
    127 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    How does that work? For example if we use $ per 1000 marks and normal price from Newegg

    2x Sappy 5770 = 2x $180 = $360, Heaven DX11 1145 marks
    Performance cost = 1000/1145 * 360 = $314 per 1000marks

    1x Sappy 5850 = 1x $300, Heaven DX11 1059 marks
    Performance cost = 1000/1059 * 300 = $283 per 1000marks

    Or are your 5770's at stock clocks :confused:

    Having a price/performance column (based on normal prices) listed with the results would be nice. ;)
  10. InTeL-iNsIdE Guest

    UK prices are different to the US, I got my 5770's for £220 the cheapest 5850's are around £230-£245

    I did say it was cheaper in my case
  11. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    Unigine Heaven score 1860

    2DividedbyZero|XFX HD4870x2|850/1000|1860|C2Q Q6600@3.68GHZ

    [​IMG]
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2010
  12. r9

    r9

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,144 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    284
    Why is my score so High ( 885 ) compared to jjFarking XFX 5850 910 and Xternal PowerColor HD5770 584 ?
    I have had re run test 3 times checked couple time res and setting to match of those that are asked and no driver tweaks.
  13. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    Unigine Tropics 2140

    2DividedbyZero|XFX HD4870x2|850/1000|2140|C2Q Q6600@3.68GHZ

    [​IMG]
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2010
  14. InTeL-iNsIdE Guest

    Cause your running dx10
  15. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    Unigine Sanctuary 7885

    2DividedbyZero|XFX HD4870x2|850/1000|7885|C2Q Q6600@3.68GHZ

    [​IMG]
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2010
  16. Xternal

    Xternal New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2009
    Messages:
    20 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Location:
    Puerto Rico
    I would like to know that too...:shadedshu
  17. Black Panther

    Black Panther Senior Moderator™ Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2007
    Messages:
    8,564 (3.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,919
    The Laptop

    I've only done Heaven so far.

    Black Panther|Clevo 8800M GTX| 500/799 | 959 |C2Q Q9450 @ 2.67Ghz

    [​IMG]
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2010
    Binge says thanks.
  18. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,568 (5.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,435
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    Just noticed this..... gonna give it a run to see how the old 4890's will do.
    Binge says thanks.
  19. AthlonX2

    AthlonX2 HyperVtX™

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    7,141 (2.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,643
    here is all i can get for now:)

    AthlonX2|EVGA GTX 275|699/1244|1184|i5 750@4.0Ghz


    [​IMG]
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2010
  20. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    For some people they are getting a boost because the program supports their cpu. For instance I'm seeing users with Q9550s getting better scores than users with i7s. This isn't much of an issue, but I thought it should be mentioned.

    ::EDIT:: UPDATE!

    • Great run Black Panther :)
    • r9, your score was removed. For some reason your DX11 run isn't tessellating.
    • AthlonX2 & 2DividedByZero PLEASE read the first post, this is very important as you have run the benchmark. If you want to have your results added you must present your information in the correct format. There are no exceptions.
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2010
  21. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell



    strange as I appear to have included all of the above, what am I missing???


    Steve
  22. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    Those are only the rules about what must be in your screenshot. Your post must include the following.

  23. 2DividedbyZero New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Messages:
    780 (0.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    202
    Location:
    in retarded hell
    posts edited to show

    2DividedbyZero|XFX HD4870x2|850/1000|C2Q Q6600@3.68GHZ
    Last edited: Jan 30, 2010
    Binge says thanks.
  24. Binge

    Binge Overclocking Surrealism

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    6,982 (3.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,751
    Location:
    PA, USA
    Updated! Thank you very much for editing your submissions. :toast:
  25. r9

    r9

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,144 (0.97/day)
    Thanks Received:
    284
    I`m setting API DX11 and tessellation ON. How come the test endsup DX10 or w/o tessellation as you suggest ?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page