1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Unigine Heaven 4.0 Benchmark Scores

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by FX-GMC, Mar 14, 2014.

  1. FX-GMC

    FX-GMC

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    847 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    322
    Location:
    Cumberland Plateau
    ***PRESS F12 for SCREENSHOT - Please attach a screen capture of your results for score verification.***
    ***Your submission will not be added if you fail to follow the rules stated below.***

    Benchmark setup:

    1.) 1920x1080, Fullscreen, 8x Anti-Aliasing
    2.) Ultra Quality
    3.) Extreme Tessellation
    4.) No integrated GPU enabled, unless it's the only GPU in the build
    5.) Tessellation correctly set up on AMD cards and not bypassed in CCC
    6.) You must also provide correct GPU and CPU clocks
    7.) Must Be a Screenshot from within Heaven to be valid (See bottom of post) Here's why.
    8.) The only allowed "tweak" is overclocking. Absolutely no driver tweaks or operating system tweaks are permitted. The goal is to provide a chart that represents real world usage for people both in and outside of this community to use to compare their cards or for comparison when buying a new card.

    It will ensure that we have consistent results.


    **Scores**



    Single GPU
    ____________
    # CPU Frequency GPU GPU Clocks Score User Name
    1 1.) i7-3770K 3.5GHz GTX 780 Ti 1450/2050 2057 WebTourist
    2 2.) i7-4770K 4.5GHz GTX 780 Ti 1385/1900 1967 khemist
    3 3.) i7-2700K 4.9GHz GTX 780 Ti 1348/1984 1924 ninja85
    4 4.) i7-3930K 4.4GHz GTX 780 Ti 1372/1825 1907 the54thvoid
    5 5.) i7-4930K 5.05GHz GTX Titan 1202/1777 1837 MetalRacer
    6 6.) i7-4770K 4.6GHz GTX 780 Ti 1179/2027 1831 MatsGlobetrotter
    7 7.) i7-4930K 4.6GHz GTX 780 Ti 1212/2000 1814 twojnts
    8 8.) i7-4770K 4.4GHz GTX 780 Ti 1277/1861 1780 20mmrain
    9 9.) i7-2600K 5.0GHz GTX 780 Ti 1165/1925 1777 devilpepper
    10 10.) i7-4790K 4.6GHz GTX 780 Ti 1227/1800 1764 Alien Demigod
    11 11.) i7-4770K 4.2GHz GTX 780 Ti 1110/1750 1763 Dj-Electric
    12 12.) i7-2600K 4.6GHz GTX 780 Ti 1241/1751 1743 BarbaricSoul
    13 13.) i7-3930K 4.4GHz GTX Titan 1227/1752 1728 the54thvoid
    14 14.) i7-4770K 3.5GHz GTX 780 Ti ????/???? 1704 theOtherGuy2175
    15 15.) i7-2600K 4.5GHz GTX 780 1306/1800 1698 Droffz
    16 16.) i7-2700K 4.9GHz GTX 780 1320/1850 1696 ninja85
    17 17.) i7-3930K 3.2GHz R9 290X 1247/1666 1691 Eroticus
    18 18.) FX-8320 4.6GHz GTX 780 1361/1727 1685 FX-GMC
    19 19.) FX-8350 4.5GHz GTX 780 Ti 1138/1915 1684 goninja
    20 20.) FX-8350 5.1GHz GTX 780 1293/1850 1679 Durvelle27
    21 21.) i7-4770K 3.5GHz GTX 780 1320/1750 1657 MxPhenom 216
    22 22.) i5-4670K 4.2GHz GTX 780 Ti 1231/1825 1637 Andrew LB
    23 23.) i5-4690K 4.5GHz GTX780 1241/1584 1617 z1tu
    24 24.) i7-3770K 5.0GHz R9 290X 1240/1600 1608 dr_dx
    25 25.) i7-4770K 3.5GHz GTX 780 1238/1600 1584 mdbrotha03
    26 26.) i7-3770K 3.5GHz GTX 780 1202/1670 1580 superiorpyre
    27 27.) i7-920 3.4GHz GTX 780 1238/1600 1565 mdbrotha03
    28 28.) FX-6350 4.3GHz GTX 780 1215/1575 1563 z1tu
    29 29.) i7-4790K 4.6GHz R9 290X 1240/1425 1546 AlienDemigod
    30 30.) i7-4770K 4.6GHz GTX 780 1228/1502 1530 TheHunter
    31 31.) i7-2600K 4.4GHz GTX 780 1175/1658 1513 ajax
    32 32.) i7-3770K 4.7GHz GTX 780 1035/1604 1504 freakshow
    33 33.) i7-3770K 4.6GHz R9 290X 1180/1325 1483 sirbaili
    34 34.) i7-4770K 4.4GHz GTX 780 1150/1502 1466 HammerON
    35 35.) i7-4790K 4.0GHx GTX 780 ????/???? 1464 Jetster
    36 36.) FX-8350 5.0GHz R9 290 1150/1450 1465 Durvelle27
    37 37.) i5-4670K 3.4GHz GTX 780 1050/1580 1447 THE_EVIL_RAPIER
    38 38.) i7-4770K 4.3GHz R9 290 1150/1420 1441 SimpleTech
    39 39.) i7-960 3.8GHz GTX 780 1031/1556 1433 Rekkapena
    40 40.) i5-4670K 4.4GHz GTX 780 1110/1502 1433 jakedubbleya
    41 41.) i5-4670K 4.2GHz R9 290 1120/1250 1410 Tupac33
    42 42.) i7-2700K 4.8GHz R9 290X 1050/1350 1408 chevy350
    43 43.) i7-3770K 4.6GHz R9 290 1000/1250 1407 sirbaili
    44 44.) Xeon W3520 4.0GHz R9 290X 1000/1250 1372 Solaris17
    45 45.) FX-8320 4.5GHz R9 290 1150/1350 1368 gdallsk
    46 46.) FX-6300 4.0GHz R9 290 1090/1380 1318 GrieverBlade
    47 47.) FX-8320 4.5GHz R9 290 1070/1350 1311 m0nt3
    48 48.) FX-8350 4.1GHz R9 290 1010/1300 1291 Biones
    49 49.) FX-8350 4.8GHz HD 7970 1290/1850 1125 Durvelle27
    50 50.) i5-2500K 4.0GHz GTX 770 1306/2067 1121 HazMatt
    51 51.) i5-2500K 4.5GHz R9 280X 1242/1725 1080 xonedl
    52 52.) i7-3770K 4.6GHz HD 7970 1250/1650 1069 erocker
    53 53.) Phenom X4 955 3.7GHz R9 280X 1200/1707 1029 itsakjt
    54 54.) FX-8350 4.7GHz HD 7970 1180/1680 1019 MalcomXT
    55 55.) i7-2600K 4.8GHz GTX 670 1306/1851 1011 dcf-joe
    56 56.) i5-4440 3.1GHz R9 280X 1160/1650 1003 yadezigh
    57 57.) i5-3450 3.8GHz HD 7950 1240/1425 1000 _larry
    58 58.) i7-3770K 4.5GHz GTX 670 1129/1840 984 Bladedrummer
    59 59.) FX-6350 4.4GHz R9 280X 1150/1500 974 z1tu
    60 60.) i5-4670K 3.4GHz R9 280X 1070/1550 943 Valor
    61 61.) C2Q Q9550 3.4GHz GTX 680 1164/1552 910 Hugis
    62 62.) i5-3750K 3.4GHz GTX 670 1140/1507 892 PersonWithTech
    63 63.) i7-3770K 4.8GHz HD 7970 1010/1375 883 fullinfusion
    64 64.) i5-2500 4.0GHz GTX 760 1145/1652 880 The N
    65 65.) Pentium G870 3.1GHz GTX 580 948/1024 846 rodrigobenchmarker
    66 66.) i7-920 4.4GHz GTX 580 950/1170 844 GreiverBlade
    67 67.) i5-3450 3.1GHz HD 7950 1000/1380 843 reny900
    68 68.) Athlon X4 760K 4.2GHz GTX 580 935/1065 797 GreiverBlade
    69 69.) i7-2600K 3.4GHz HD 7870 1250/1550 784 mingolito
    70 70.) i5-4570 3.8GHz R9 270X 1250/1500 782 Theo.s
    71 71.) FX-8320 4.4GHz HD 7870 1150/1450 727 Durvelle27
    72 72.) Xeon X5450 3.0GHz R9 270 1100/1500 716 Riktar
    73 73.) Athlon X4 760K 4.2GHz R9 270 1050/1500 714 GreiverBlade
    74 74.) Xeon E3 1275 V2 3.5GHz R9 270 1050/1500 702 GreiverBlade
    75 75.) Phenom X4 9600B 2.4GHz GTX 460 930/1100 605 GreiverBlade
    76 76.) i7-4800MQ 2.7GHz GTX870M 1019/1250 582 Shinyier
    77 77.) FX-6100 3.3GHz HD 7850 900/1200 533 Devon68
    78 78.) i7-2600 3.4GHz GTX 560 1000/1650 525 toppedro
    79 79.) i7-4700MQ 2.4GHz GTX 770M 809/1002 469 Fizban



    Multi GPU
    ____________
    # CPU Frequency GPU GPU Clocks # of GPUs Score User Name
    1 1.) i7-4930K 4.8GHz R9 290X 1240/1625 4 5305 Kaapstad
    2 2.) i7-4770K 4.4GHz R9 290X/290 1080/1350 4 4673 night.fox
    3 3.) FX-8350 5.02GHz HD 7970 1125/1575 4 3964 red1414
    4 4.) i7-3930K 4.8GHz GTX 780 1424/1750 3 3912 hu1kamania
    5 5.) i7-3770K 3.5GHz GTX 780 Ti 1390/2025 2 3787 WebTourist
    6 6.) i7-3770K 4.7GHz HD 7990 1150/1700 2 3669 05_ACR_SRT4
    7 7.) i7-3930K 4.6GHz HD 7950 1170/1570 4 3522 Dagamus(NM)
    8 8.) i7-4930K 4.4GHz GTX 780 Ti 1175/1785 2 3232 Paladone
    9 9.) i7-4960X 3.6GHz GTX 780 Ti ????/???? 2 3219 Vistaron
    10 10.) i7-4770K 4.6GHz GTX 780 1200/1800 2 3109 lunatis
    11 11.) i7-4770K 4.4GHz GTX 780 1140/1702 2 2895 HammerON
    12 12.) i7-4770K 4.2GHz GTX 780 1190/1502 2 2858 Gribar
    13 13.) i7-4770K 3.5GHz GTX 780 Ti 1046/1750 2 2827 theOtherGuy2175
    14 14.) i7-3770K 4.6GHz R9 290 1100/1250 2 2730 sirbaili
    15 15.) i7-2700K 4.8GHz R9 290 ???/??? 2 2725 freeleacher
    16 16.) i7-2600K 3.4GHz GTX 780 1020/1502 2 2645 HumanSmoke
    17 17.) i7-3770K 4.5GHz HD 7950 1100/1375 3 2522 gkipers
    18 18.) i7-3770K 4.5GHz GTX 770 ???/??? 2 2310 Knoxx29
    19 19.) i7-3770K 4.8GHz HD 7970 1280/1770 2 2176 fullinfusion
    20 20.) i7-4820K 3.7GHz GTX 770 1306/1800 2 1901 draklanar
    21 21.) i5-2500K 4.5GHz GTX 670 1050/1750 2 1846 renozi
    22 22.) FX-8320 4.0GHz HD 7950 1125/1500 2 1835 MCanalog
    23 23.) i7-3770K 4.2GHz HD 7950 800/1250 2 1756 Jetster
    24 24.) i7-3770K 4.2GHz GTX 760 995/1750 2 1720 havene
    25 25.) i7-2600K 3.4GHz R9 280X 1060/1550 (?) 2 1415 RealNeil
    26 26.) FX-8320 4.8GHz HD 7870 1150/1450 2 1389 Durvelle27
    27 27.) Xeon E3 1275 V2 3.7GHz GTX 580 900/1050 2 1322 GreiverBlade
    28 28.) i7-2600K 4.4GHz GTX 570 797/1950 2 1171 Rizeon1
    29 29.) FX-8350 4.3GHz GTX 570 732/950 2 1085 RealNeil
    30 30.) i7-3770K 3.5GHz GTX 650 Ti Boost 1098/1502 2 1042 Bladedrummer



    AMD FX-8320 @ 4.6GHz | GTX 780 1361/1727

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Sep 29, 2014 at 2:23 PM
  2. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,705 (13.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    14,103
    HammerON, GreiverBlade and FX-GMC say thanks.
  3. FX-GMC

    FX-GMC

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    847 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    322
    Location:
    Cumberland Plateau
    Updated thread. If I missed anyone from the old thread send me a link to the post and I will add it. I'm also thinking I may move score to the first column and get rid of the number system. If anyone has a suggestion of a light text editor that will auto increment numbers without much hassle please let me know.

    Also, if there are any mistakes do tell me. Feel free to PM to keep the clutter down.

    Special thanks to @erocker @HammerON @W1zzard for helping out with this.
     
    GreiverBlade and erocker say thanks.
  4. gdallsk

    gdallsk

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2012
    Messages:
    293 (0.33/day)
    Thanks Received:
    117
    Location:
    Northamptonshire
    R9 290 1150/1350
    [​IMG]
     
  5. Devon68

    Devon68

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2014
    Messages:
    595 (2.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    222
    Here is my score: It's an FX-6100 @ 3.3 GHz (stock) and MSI HD7850 TFIII @ 900/1200 (stock).
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2014
  6. khemist

    khemist

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    186 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    418
    Location:
    Scotland, UK
    [​IMG]

    1967

    4770k @ 4.5 780Ti @ 1385/1900
     
    the54thvoid says thanks.
  7. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,338 (1.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,565
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity

    oooff... as Archie McPherson once said...

    Hey Khemist, I'm in a mini dilemma. Funds are no issue so it's all down to practicalities. My Titan is gaming stable at about 1.1GHz, any more and i need to up volts to 1.21. On voltages up to 1.25-1.28 it's bench stable at 1215GHz but not game stable.

    I've had a 780Ti Classified in and out of my basket about 5 times in two days. I'd have bought one ages ago if it wasn't for the 3GB memory niggle though I feel it will have no impact at my res (1440p). You think I'll see a 20% increase in performance when overclocked on what I have now? If I'll only get 10% more real world performance than my current 1.1GHz then I'll leave it - I'm not a bench pro but if it'll give me say a boost from 50fps to 60+fps in BF4 for example, I'll jump.

    I appreciate your thoughts as I know you came from Titan to what I'm thinking of.
     
  8. FX-GMC

    FX-GMC

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    847 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    322
    Location:
    Cumberland Plateau
    Nice score. Thanks for making me increment every number in the list. :laugh:
     
    khemist says thanks.
  9. khemist

    khemist

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    186 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    418
    Location:
    Scotland, UK

    I really don't think it's worth it, i only bought mine because i really wanted a new toy to bench with and to make matters worse i'm running at 1080p just now and not my normal 1600p so was not needed at all.

    If i was planning on staying at 1600p i wouldn't have bought this card because of the 3gb mem on it and you are not far off that with your monitor.
     
    the54thvoid says thanks.
  10. Bladedrummer

    Bladedrummer

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2013
    Messages:
    7 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Ran this on a machine at my work just for giggles.

    i7 3770K@3.5 Ghz (Stock Clock), SLI MSI GTX 650 Ti Boost (x2). Graphics cards both at stock 1098/3004

    [​IMG]
     
  11. SGTFulmer

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2014
    Messages:
    7 (0.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Just got a 988 with an FX 6300, 16 gbs RAM and a r9 270. Pics coming later.
     
  12. FX-GMC

    FX-GMC

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    847 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    322
    Location:
    Cumberland Plateau
    Regretfully, I cannot add your score unless you run the benchmark at 1920x1080

     
  13. GreiverBlade

    GreiverBlade

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,214 (2.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,551
    Location:
    Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
    hardly believable if you look at the similar setup and score, and my R9 270 also run on maxed AFB clock (aka 1050/1500), but i pretty much doubt 8gb ram more or a FX 6300 over a X4 760K or a Xeon E3-1275V2 would do a difference.

    34.)FX-8320 4.4GHzHD 7870 1150/1450 727 Durvelle27
    35.)Athlon X4 760K 4.2GHzR9 270 1050/1500 714 GreiverBlade
    36.)Xeon E3 1275 V2 3.5GHzR9 270 1050/1500 702 GreiverBlade
    37.)Phenom X4 9600 B2.4GHzGTX 460 930/1100 605 GreiverBlade
    38.)FX-6100 3.3GHzHD 7850 900/1200 533 Devon68

    and i also doubt a 6300 + R9 270 would be above that one ... otherwise i would gladly take a 180chf card that perform like a 320chf card
    29.)FX-6350 4.4GHzR9 280X1150/1500 974 z1tu


    rahhh TPU capture gave me a black screen ... drat i have to re run
     
    Last edited: Mar 25, 2014
  14. Durvelle27

    Durvelle27

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    Messages:
    2,572 (3.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    641
    Location:
    Memphis, TN
    Nice guys
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. FX-GMC

    FX-GMC

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    847 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    322
    Location:
    Cumberland Plateau
    Read the rules and see if you can tell what you did wrong.
     
  16. 20mmrain

    20mmrain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,772 (1.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    825
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    *Delete* - Bye bye submission. I don't take sarcasm well. Good luck on your thread
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2014
  17. GreiverBlade

    GreiverBlade

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,214 (2.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,551
    Location:
    Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
    on the older thread it was the same way about that (or even worse just a : "rejected" added without further ado) , also if there is "rules" about how to submit result in the initial post, it is not to bypass them and complain about sarcasm
    i am always sarcastic and i assume every comment against me or for me as sarcastic so i don't take them badly :roll:

    btw since all other user posted screenshot of the bench itself and not the HTML result file i don't get why bothering posting a HTML screenshot :D
    for example:
    cheatven.jpg
    ofc you didn't faked yours, but it is why we don't like HTML files

    plus your score if submitted the right way could have taken the 5th place, it was a good average score for a 780 Ti
     
    FX-GMC says thanks.
  18. FX-GMC

    FX-GMC

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    847 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    322
    Location:
    Cumberland Plateau
    I do apologize if i offended you. I've been told that exact thing in life and I didn't take it as sarcasm. The point of the post was that you should always read the rules. I've known plenty of people to fail tests because they didn't follow directions.

    Should I have to tell somebody what they did wrong when the rules are clearly stated in the OP? Suggestions?

    I'd be glad to put you in your rightful place if you repost correctly.

    EDIT: Seems after this incident I am just going to ignore people who do not post in the proper format. Some people can be too touchy.
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2014
  19. GreiverBlade

    GreiverBlade

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,214 (2.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,551
    Location:
    Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
    and the people who you gonna ignore, because of that, will be touchy and go ballistic over "the OP doesn't update scores, the thread must be dead..."

    and i figured out TPUcapture ... (took me a while ...) so 760 pts, under the same gpu and a i7-920 but still better than the same X4 760K and a R9 270 oh well ... could be worse
    Athlon X4 760K @ 4.278 (101.87x42) (tho the result panel show 4.192 i wonder why :roll: since turbo is de activated and the cpu show in any other monitoring software to be running on 101.87x42 and EVGA GTX 580 @ 900/2102
    [​IMG]

    i have to try pushing that EVGA on the same level i did with the Zotac (the one with the i7 920)
     
  20. FX-GMC

    FX-GMC

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2013
    Messages:
    847 (2.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    322
    Location:
    Cumberland Plateau
    It's a lose-lose situation. You have too many hardware configurations. Confusing to figure out if I needed to add a new line or update an old one. :laugh:
     
  21. GreiverBlade

    GreiverBlade

    Joined:
    May 9, 2012
    Messages:
    2,214 (2.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,551
    Location:
    Ovronnaz, Wallis, Switzerland
    bench and test and again and again :roll: i post the result of my actual main rig most of the time (a shame i never ran a Heaven with the 770 :D )
    also your chart is a good way for me to see what i need to optimize to get the best out of my hardware :D IE: it actually showed me that a R9 270 was a bad idea since it was almost 2 time the price of the 580 i run now o_O

    @FX-GMC : this time its a score update of the previous

    it seems i can't push that EVGA further than 935/ 2130 de installed A-tuner it seems it was making the OC unstable yet running standard 3.7 with 4.2 turbo provide a better score ... still 2core shown instead of 4
    heaven#.jpg

    at last 37pts more but it doesn't change my ranking :D no headache ;)
     
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2014
    FX-GMC says thanks.
  22. yadezigh New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2014
    Messages:
    2 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    i5-4440@3.1Ghz
    R9 280X 1160/1500

    [​IMG]
     
    GreiverBlade says thanks.
  23. 20mmrain

    20mmrain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,772 (1.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    825
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    Sorry man, I may have been too touchy. But I have been a member of this forum for a long time. And I think the trolling is starting to take its toll on me. To me it seems the trolling has gotten worse through the years. (Or maybe I am getting old). So I took your comment as you were trying to be condescending instead of helpful.

    I will re-run the benchmark and take a screen shot
     
    GreiverBlade and HammerON say thanks.
  24. theOtherGuy2175

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2014
    Messages:
    4 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Untitled.png Yeah specs are above usually im running at 4.5 ghz but with a recent tweak to something in the bios I accidently lost my oc settings. so yeah.... any ways my gpu is the EVGA gtx 780ti which i do have sli but for the purpose of this test i dissabled it for this. Hope i get in the top ten!!
     
  25. 20mmrain

    20mmrain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    2,772 (1.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    825
    Location:
    Midwest USA
    Nice run buddy.... but please review the rules. I just recently made the same mistake and my submission was invalid. You must post a screenshot from with in the benchmark itself. Like my new submission below.

    20mmrain - Intel i7 4770K@4.4 Ghz - EVGA GTX 780Ti SC @ 1246Core / 1831Mem - Corsair Dominator Platinum 8GB 2666Mhz - Score 1747

    Think I can pull off a little more though :)
    [​IMG]
     
    GreiverBlade says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page