1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Unigine Releases Heaven 4.0 GPU Benchmark

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Feb 13, 2013.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,749 (11.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,676
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    UNIGINE Corp. has released a new, enhanced version 4.0 of Heaven Benchmark, the GPU intensive benchmark that gained massive popularity among overclockers and hardware manufacturers for hammering their graphics cards to the limits. This powerful tool can be effectively used to determine the stability of a GPU under extremely stressful conditions, as well as check the cooling system's potential under maximum heat output. It provides completely unbiased results and generates true in-game rendering workloads across all platforms, such as Windows, Linux and Mac OS X.

    Heaven Benchmark immerses a user into a magical steampunk world of shiny brass, wood and gears. Nested on flying islands, a tiny village with its cozy, sun-heated cobblestone streets, an elaborately crafted dirigible above the expanse of fluffy clouds, and a majestic dragon on the central square gives a true sense of adventure. An interactive experience with fly-by and walk-through modes allows for exploring all corners of this world powered by the cutting-edge UNIGINE Engine that leverages the most advanced capabilities of graphics APIs and turns this benchmark into a visual masterpiece.

    [​IMG]

    DOWNLOAD: Unigine Heaven 4.0 for Windows, Mac OS X, Linux

    Key Features
    • Extreme hardware stability testing
    • Accurate results due to 100% GPU-bound benchmarking
    • Support for DirectX 9, DirectX 11 and OpenGL 4.0
    • Multi-platform support for Windows, Linux and Mac OS X
    • Comprehensive use of hardware tessellation, with adjustable settings
    • Cinematic and interactive fly/walk-through camera modes
    • Dynamic sky with volumetric clouds and tweakable day-night cycle
    • Real-time global illumination and screen-space ambient occlusion
    • Support for multi-monitor configurations and different stereo 3D modes
    What's New in Heaven 4.0
    • Benchmarking presets for convenient comparison of results
    • GPU temperature and clock monitoring
    • Drastic improvement of SSDO
    • Stars at nighttime
    • Improvement of lens flare
    • New, improved version of UNIGINE Engine under the hood
    • Detection of multiple GPUs
    • Anti-aliasing support on Mac OS X
    • Enhancement of automation scripts in Pro version
    • New Advanced edition (see details below)
    • Russian and Chinese localization
    Heaven Benchmark comes in three editions: Basic (available for free), Advanced and Pro, each aimed to meet the needs of different users. For more information, visit this page.
     
    t77snapshot, cadaveca and D007 say thanks.
  2. natr0n

    natr0n

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    1,973 (1.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,019
    Looks nice, They used higher res textures on everything and sky has stars now.
     
  3. LAN_deRf_HA

    LAN_deRf_HA

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2008
    Messages:
    4,557 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    952
    They added more graphical glitches instead of fixing the old ones. It's like they've never used their own program for stress testing despite offering a loop feature.
     
  4. renozi New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2005
    Messages:
    255 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Location:
    Glendale, Arizona
    mine crashes barely 30 seconds in
     
  5. dwade

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2012
    Messages:
    117 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Lol. Unrealistic road.
     
  6. T4C Fantasy

    T4C Fantasy CPU & GPU DB Maintainer

    Joined:
    May 7, 2012
    Messages:
    973 (1.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    411
    Render:
    Direct3D11

    Mode:
    1920x1067 8xAA windowed

    Preset
    Custom

    Quality
    Ultra

    Tessellation:
    Extreme


    Unigine Heaven Benchmark 4.0

    FPS:
    37.2

    Score:
    937

    Min FPS:
    20.9

    Max FPS:
    80.6
     
  7. Zubasa

    Zubasa

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    3,980 (1.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    457
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Finally no more DX8 level textures :laugh:
     
  8. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    Extreme run -

    [​IMG]
     
  9. Enmitynz

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Messages:
    91 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Location:
    Aotearoa, the land of the thieving bees
    Here's my first extreme run. max settings inc 8xaa, tessellation extreme etc etc

    [​IMG]
     
  10. erixx

    erixx

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,446 (2.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    487
    bleee, i expected a different "map". Same old fairy village.
     
  11. HammerON

    HammerON The Watchful Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,536 (3.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,640
    Tested @ 2560x1600 res, Tesslation=Extreme, Quality=High and Anti-Aliasing=x8.

    Single 7970. All stock:
    [​IMG]

    Two 7970's. All stock:
    [​IMG]

    Three 7970's. All stock:
    [​IMG]

    So with two 7970's the scaling is great, with three not so much (66% usage).
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2013
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. BigMack70

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    506 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    114
    Well they definitely beefed this thing up beyond Unigine 3.0... maxed out 1440p 4xAA I get 89.6 fps in 3.0 but only 58 fps in 4.0.

    They did make the lights prettier, though :)

    I'm hoping that Valley isn't a total slideshow.

    (edit) Anyone know why they picked the pathetic resolution of 1600x900 as the "extreme" resolution? There's not much extreme about 1600x900...
     
  13. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,256 (1.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    294
    We need a reference for those tests. Everybody is testing randomly here. To bad there are no predefined profiles... Or are they??
     
  14. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    My guess would be on the resolution because most people could run 1600x900 even with laptops for comparison's sake. That is the reason I made my run without any tweaks to the benchmark, but it seems everyone else has made adjustments so far in their extreme runs...no way to make any comparison that way.
     
  15. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    Mine was...just click on it and go. ;)
     
  16. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    21,151 (7.81/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,678
    San Francisco?
     
    erixx says thanks.
  17. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    Same run as above with a little bump to the cpu...glad to see so little impact from a cpu overclock.


    [​IMG]
     
  18. BigMack70

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2012
    Messages:
    506 (0.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    114
    There are but when I have a 1440p monitor why the hell would I want to run a benchmark at a puny 1600x900 (the "extreme" preset resolution)?

    I thumb my nose at things which encourage this current trend of resolution stagnation to continue. Benchmarks should be about pushing technology, not pretending it's 2005.
     
  19. cRs

    cRs New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Germany/Romania
    All stock :laugh:

    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

  20. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    The entire idea is to be able to compare different hardware...without a standard there can be no comparison. No one said you could not do as you please, but without a standard you have nothing to compare with except yourself. ;)
     
  21. Enmitynz

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2012
    Messages:
    91 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Location:
    Aotearoa, the land of the thieving bees
    Thought i'd update my heaven 4.0 run here..I just checked my ccc and it was on "override application settings" and forced to 2x tessellation for that first run I posted lol so that explains why the screen shot looked kinda lackluster in the heaven run. Changed both tessellation mode and maximum tessellation levels to "use application settings" now and here is the new extreme run. Managed to get a much higher minimum fps this time round?

    [​IMG]
     
  22. erixx

    erixx

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,446 (2.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    487
    Mailman, Phoronix posted some awesome videos, why not for us? hu? ha? he!
     
  23. MightyMission

    MightyMission

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,032 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    136
    My fps was awful..what am i doing wrong?!?

    [​IMG]

    2500k @4.6..gtx 680 stock,occed by 225 on the core and 550 on the ram done not much!
     
  24. rickss69

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    2,431 (1.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    604
    Location:
    Rockvale TN (Not Australia)
    Just hit the Extreme preset and nothing else and run it...see what it does.
     
    MightyMission says thanks.
  25. MightyMission

    MightyMission

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,032 (0.78/day)
    Thanks Received:
    136
    This looks better! well,the results do,my paint skills are lacking at best :eek:)
    [​IMG]
     
    rickss69 says thanks.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page