1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Unlimited Detail Technology

Discussion in 'Games' started by AphexDreamer, Mar 11, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. scaminatrix

    scaminatrix

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,579 (2.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    794
    Location:
    By the Channel Tunnel, Kent, England
    JF-AMD is a member here, he's a rep for the server side of AMD. He floats around TPU clearing up misconceptions and alleviating confusion lol
     
  2. remixedcat

    remixedcat

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,066 (1.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    699
    people contacting companies: Use the contact forms on thier websites. use a professional email address in the input field. they will likely ignore @yahoo @hotmail @gmail , etc. Try to find a free provider that is relatively unknown.

    These kinda companies get trolled a lot. They have put up defenses. I've legitimately tried to contact Emergent Game Technologies about pricing and they flat out refused to reply to me. I've had zero luck with them.

    Contacting Havok REQUIRES a company email. THEY WILL NOT RESPOND TO ANY FREE EMAIL ADDRESSES. it must be a game company domain email like r.cat@ea.com or something like that.

    Most game related companies will have crap like this to overcome.

    Try to get a hold of a professional email address.
     
  3. inferKNOX

    inferKNOX

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    905 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Location:
    SouthERN Africa
    @streetfighter 2: Sorry, I'm not too... ah... patent concious. Could you try search Euclideon and see if anything turns up? According to euclideon.com, it seems that they're based in Australia, think this could be the reason for lack of patents/support?

    @Kreji: Not doubting their awareness as much as wanting them to give some support and or explore viability. Basically don't want them to dump it just because it will indeed deliver and they're just scared of what that may mean.

    @scaminatrix: ah, I see.
     
  4. scaminatrix

    scaminatrix

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    Messages:
    3,579 (2.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    794
    Location:
    By the Channel Tunnel, Kent, England
    Fix'd!
    This is what I was looking for. It seems very likely that this is going be infringing on someone elses patent then. Shame.
     
  5. inferKNOX

    inferKNOX

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    905 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Location:
    SouthERN Africa
    Or... put your name down here: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/amd_support_udtech/
    (or both;))
     
  6. crazyeyesreaper

    crazyeyesreaper Chief Broken Rig

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Messages:
    8,180 (3.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,821
    Location:
    04578
    dosent matter how good this is and heres why almost anything done in 3d is still at its root a polygon no matter if its a triangle or a quad some of the tech in this is used at the END of the pipeline to be blunt this wont cut development time on games or 3d in general for the most part it adds another step sure its possible that i can give a better image better visuals thats one of its strong points. The sad fact is tho before you get those points the models etc need to be made and just about every $1000-$50,000 piece of software in the Entertainment industry uses 1 of three things in terms of rendering a mesh.

    Sub Division Surfaces there a semi combination of nurbs and polygons there never perfectly flat but there not as natural as a nurbs surface they function like polygons but allow select areas to be highly detailed while others can be sparse aka a knuckle on a finger could have 100k + polygons to show wrinkles while the rest of the hand might only be 10k polygons to show proper rounding etc. Its a go between thats seldom used.

    NURBS surfaces are always round in someway if it curves it never has a straight edge so these are the closest to real life a 3d app gets in terms of lower system usage for high lvls of base detail but they dont function or animate well like polygons and are far more complex to use. In general there the best to use to represent a real life object but there draw backs make them extremely limited.

    Polygons - we all know these they come in many forms triangles quads ngons etc there what gets rendered fact is the above methods at render time in every 3d app ever made are simplified down to triangles.

    This applies to the UDT any info put into it in terms of 3d if it has to be created its gonna be done with polygons nurbs etc. This is nothing new final renders for lighting in Maya already do this. but the meshes themselves are still triangulated.

    for those that hate walls of text read below

    This tech is nothing new wont effect games and probably wont see the light of day anytime soon its basically a pipedream unless every major tech giant agrees to promote it aka Intel Amd Nvidia Microsoft Apple Autodesk, Pixologic, Adobe, yadda yadda
     
  7. inferKNOX

    inferKNOX

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    905 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Location:
    SouthERN Africa
    @crazyeyes: then let's get the ball rolling and have the giants recognise it. The construction of 3D models might not be faster, and this may be a style already used (in all honesty I don't know), but surely it has never been the case where such vast quantities of whether they be polygons or whatever could be rendered with the minimal load claimed by the maker of UDT, or else we'd be in graphic nirvana by now.

    Edit: The petition sigs are coming in. Thanks guys, keep them coming, put a link in your sig, digg the petition page, like it on Facebook, anything to spread the word and get the numbers!:rockout:
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2010
  8. remixedcat

    remixedcat

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,066 (1.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    699
    Great, InferKNOX!!!! Let's get this moving and a shakin!
     
    inferKNOX says thanks.
  9. Marineborn

    Marineborn New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,144 (0.99/day)
    Thanks Received:
    312
    ill make the burgers...lets rock n roll
     
    inferKNOX and remixedcat say thanks.
  10. qubit

    qubit Overclocked quantum bit

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    9,939 (3.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,531
    Location:
    Quantum well (UK)
    Yeah, I'm up for this. Let's roll! :D
     
    inferKNOX says thanks.
  11. inferKNOX

    inferKNOX

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    905 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Location:
    SouthERN Africa
  12. streetfighter 2

    streetfighter 2 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2010
    Messages:
    1,658 (1.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    732
    Location:
    Philly
    I believe you're referring to System and method for parsing point-cloud data invented by Chang, Et al. That patent only pertains to parsing point cloud data, not culling point cloud data for mapping an x*y*z space into an x*y viewport.

    After skimming some of the patents I think that the newest one is:
    Method and apparatus for transforming point cloud data to volumetric data invented by Lee in 2007. Based on the abstract it appears to be a method of mapping point cloud data from one x*y*z space into another x*y*z space. (There are two such patents and I didn't bother to see why.)

    The patent that looks the most like the one we're looking for is from 2005 and is Visualization and storage algorithms associated with processing point cloud data invented by Graham, et al.

    The other patents I listed are methods of creating point cloud data models of 3D objects.

    We can't be sure that Unlimited Detail Technology will be infringing any patents without more info.

    As you said, the lack of software for designing/producing point cloud data models is clearly the biggest known impediment to this technology (but there are lots of unknowns).

    On the other hand I don't really see how this technology needs direct support from AMD and Nvidia at this stage. I'm assuming that Unlimited Detail Technology could write a rendering engine using their unique point cloud algorithm in OpenCL.

    I tried searching for Euclideon and nothing related came up. The fact that they are Australian wouldn't prevent their patents from being searchable unless they didn't pay the extra few hundred dollars to make their patent international.
     
    scaminatrix says thanks.
  13. Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Bjorn_Of_Iceland

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,176 (1.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    376
    afaik, outcast used voxel space rendering..
     
  14. inferKNOX

    inferKNOX

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    905 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Location:
    SouthERN Africa
    As far as I'm seeing, those point cloud patents seem quite distinct in description to the what UDTech sets out to achieve, so I don't think that it'd be infringing at this point.
    My reference to them being Australian is that they may feel less concerned about patenting at the moment, or believe themselves be unique enough, ie, difficult to describe, not to feel the need for patenting until their technology is complete or near completion.
     
  15. AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,197 (2.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    937
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
    Petition Signed.

    Imagine Minecraft with Unlimited Detail Technology... aoeirjaoijgoejgkjsego....
     
  16. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    14,117 (6.23/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,938
    Location:
    IA, USA
    I think it would be a bad investment for AMD when they can't afford bad investments (unreleased processor architectures, weak economy, etc.). As such, I can't sign the petition.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  17. AphexDreamer

    AphexDreamer

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Messages:
    7,197 (2.62/day)
    Thanks Received:
    937
    Location:
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Aphexdreamer\
    Risky yes, bad maybe.
     
  18. inferKNOX

    inferKNOX

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    905 (0.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    118
    Location:
    SouthERN Africa
    I honestly don't think AMD stands to suffer anything as long as they intergrate with it in an intelligent manner.

    I've been in contact with Bruce Dell (the CEO in charge of UDTech) and he is very happy with our effort to promote support of UD.:)
    I don't know quite how much he would be comfortable with me exposing of what he has said to me, so let me just say that this effort we're making is in the right direction and could make a significant difference in terms of helping the technology a reality for us all.
    He also said that things have been progressing well in development and they have financial stability, so what we're out to achieve with this campaign is integration and acceptance in the industry.
     
    remixedcat says thanks.
  19. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,541 (4.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,381
    sorry but those graphics look terrible. and the company behind this needs to fix up their website. it looks like a teenager put it together while high on marijuana.
     
    qubit says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  20. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    As the description of the video states, they are not artists they are software developers, your lucky they even managed to make what they did. :laugh:
     
  21. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,541 (4.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,381
    sorry, this just looks like snake oil to me and the poor graphics dont help. if this was a serious vanture he would have spent some money actually putting everything together (including his terrible web site) before revealing it to the world. i am reading a lot of technical mumbo jumbo about this being rubbish and i have to agree. and the term "unlimited detail" is impossible since we don't have "unlimited" processing power. but i dont want to rehash old arguments. this post from this website really sums it up.

    http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2010/03/10/unlimited-detail-wants-to-kill-3d-cards/

     
    qubit and Mussels say thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  22. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    The point has been missed my friend, the point is its NOT unlimited, it only displays the informations that is required, for example on my monitor it would be 1680x1050 "points"

    Anything that I wouldn't be able to see is not rendered at all.

    ( this mean it adaptively changes the point data so as you draw closer to an object you can get as close as possible and the shape/texture would not be reduced as in current rendering methods, it can do this because everything else that was viewable before going close is now not being rendered I.E you could zoom in and see the texture of a fabric with vastly superiour quality and realism compared to current methods, you could zoom in on someones face and actually see the pores etc)



    Fucking clever as bullshit and MORE than possible.
     
  23. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,541 (4.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,381
    well considering this came out of no where in March and there has not been a single update to their site nor any additional information reported in the media i would say this genuinely is a hoax.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  24. pantherx12

    pantherx12 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2009
    Messages:
    9,714 (4.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    ENGLAND-LAND-LAND
    Could be, won't deny that at all :laugh:

    Just saying the tech is more doable than a lot of people seem to think.

    My GPU can push 60+fps with 1 million particles on screen so even if this was done with coloured/shaded particles current gpus are not far off using particles to draw things.

    ( if ati gpuys supported glinterop I'd probably be above 200fps)

    And this system doesn't even use real particles so would be even better.


    I would need
    1 764 000 particles or points to have a solid image using my monitor, not that farfetched at all : ]
     
  25. The Witcher New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2008
    Messages:
    433 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Location:
    United Arab Emirates
    The speaker is ALISTAIR !!! from Dragon Age origins !!

    Anyway, if this was true, I've a feeling that this guy will be dead very soon because "Some people" will lose their business + billions of dollars.

    I would expect to this technology in real world after 10 or 15 years from now...good stuff like this always take ages to hit the consumer market....
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page