1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Valve Working On Its Own Gaming Hardware, the "Steam Box"

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 3, 2012.

  1. Abe504

    Abe504 New Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    59 (0.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Pretty good idea imo, puts pressure on the big 3 to make a better console and digital marketplace.
  2. DannibusX

    DannibusX

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,518 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    976
    Location:
    United States
    Valve. I triple dog dare you to make your own Linux distro and call it SteamOS. Then release a standard for inclusion with other distros.
  3. neko77025

    neko77025

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    69 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8

    I would like too read this "somewhere" you are talking about. Valve/Steam have very well established relationship with ATI / AMD.
  4. DannibusX

    DannibusX

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,518 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    976
    Location:
    United States
    TF2 is a TWIMTBP game, lol
  5. MikeMurphy

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    334 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    And you believe that?
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2012
  6. Iceni

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2011
    Messages:
    429 (0.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    111
    Location:
    coventry UK
    the only problem i could see is directX.

    linux and mac os currently run a hacked out version.

    however this may not be a problem if they pull Nvidia onboard as a partner. As i do believe Nvidia own 3dfx glide. This would be a bit of a programming hash up to get it back up to current specs. However it could have the bonus knock on effect of finally allowing linux and mac os the opportunity to compete in gaming. Open GL could also be used, But i would be under the impression that valve alone could not manage the workload to get the API to function without breaking copyrights, It would be down to a Gfx developer to make a solution.

    Furthermore it could see a lock out of games for windows. Since a free program that can cope with directx style information, Either under emulation or with a decode would in effect allow developers a choice they have been denied for a long time.


    PC specs for gaming don't need to be super hot, Provided you have adequate specs to run at 30fps, and enough graphical punch to use all the tricks then you can use a pretty basic model. Unlike a pc you won't have people comparing numbers overclocking. So the system can probably cope on a dual core mATX style system, with a sub £100 gfx card. Forget about the high end stuff as they simply will not need it. This means a sub £250 system should be viable. Steam could buff this by reducing your graphics options, and optimising for 30fps.

    I would expect it to be running something along the lines of a sandybridge g620, mATX, 2Gb ram, Gtx 560, and a budget green hard disc. You can build this sort of configuration for £250-300 currently at store prices. And it would play most games at 30FPS, at decent settings. That's without having bulk discounts and optimisation in the mix.

    I believe the deciding factor will be directX overall, as i can't see M$ giving up it's software to a competitor, especially when it could be damaging to xbox and windows sales in general.
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2012
    Chevalr1c says thanks.
  7. MikeMurphy

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    334 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    It will have to run windows with a steam front-end to be compatible with the majority of titles on Steam.

    I don't think MS will mind.
  8. Iceni

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2011
    Messages:
    429 (0.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    111
    Location:
    coventry UK
    I don't think it would. DirectX is the only thing that stops games migrating to other platforms. The steam front end is just a gui, it can be rewritten for linux (and probably already exists on linux in the value studio). Games themselves don't care what platform there on provided they have access to the correct resources, again directX. PC games have been developed previously on DOS, windows mac and linux. If blizzard can make all there games run on mac and windows with minimal tweaking from the same CD, then getting a tweak to make windows games run on a linux based OS won't be much harder for valve. The problem is all games currently ask for there resources through directX, This makes things impossible for companies wanting to extend away from MS as they have to go back to basics and deal with an API. Simply copying DX's link library would warrant action from MS.

    As for not hurting windows.

    Free linux with full game support, I'd have it on every machine i own. I would never buy another copy of windows again as too would a huge number of PC gamers. Linux is just a better OS in terms of stability, and resource management since you can do what you want with it. And most programs have a linux variant, just like macs do.
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2012
    Chevalr1c says thanks.
  9. MikeMurphy

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    334 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    Direct-X, and all the other Windows resources prevent it. The problem is this console isn't in itself a platform like Xbox or PS3, but rather it would use EXISTING software designed to be run on Windows. Valve can't rewrite any program they wish on steam to get it to work with Linux. You would need the original developer to do that. Fat chance any cash strapped developers will port their games w/o it paying for itself. Just because Blizzard does it, doesn't mean its easy.

    It makes much more sense to use a Windows back-end for Windows games.

    Steam boxes would be a supplement to Steam, not an entire platform of itself. It can leverage the existing library on steam to become popular. To make it an entirely separate platform would be competing with Microsoft and Sony, and would be a bad idea.
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2012
  10. wahdangun

    wahdangun New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    1,512 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    114
    Location:
    indonesia ku tercinta
    maybe they don't need to port current title to steambox, maybe they can make exlusive games for steambox, just like other console.


    i just wish valve use linux. i hate using windows
  11. NC37

    NC37

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    Messages:
    1,152 (0.58/day)
    Thanks Received:
    251
  12. MikeMurphy

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    334 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    Is a $300 core i7 really necessary when an i5 2500k is completely sufficient? Final price of $700?

    If they launch with that configuration the its going to bomb.
  13. Ikaruga

    Ikaruga

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2011
    Messages:
    860 (0.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    181
    The times when everybody wants to be in my living room:)
  14. Prima.Vera

    Prima.Vera

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Messages:
    2,004 (2.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    259
    This is cool. If Valve manages somehow to push OpenGL/OpenAL/OpenCL as a competitor for the crappy DirectX, we can witness a revolution in gaming. The OpenGL 4.2 has almost 2x the features of the DX11, but still producers are bribed to use DirectX for some reason....If any company can fight M$ on gaming grounds, I think Valve is the one... - maybe ...

    (http://blog.wolfire.com/2010/01/Why-you-should-use-OpenGL-and-not-DirectX)
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2012
    Chevalr1c says thanks.
  15. GunsAblazin New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Is Valve really supporting PC gamers?

    Question is, will I be able to build my own PC that will be able to run the SteamBox?
  16. GunsAblazin New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Sufficient, but not future proof. If they don't want it to bomb they need the most recent hardware at a decent price. By the time the box launches the price would have dropped.
  17. InnocentCriminal

    InnocentCriminal Resident Grammar Amender

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    6,476 (1.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    846
    I'll be surprised if we see a Valve console. I'm expecting something else, more peripheral like...

    [​IMG]
  18. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,132 (13.83/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,584
    Considering the tweets from Valve? Yes. Pretty poor decision going with integrated Nvidia graphics. It's just a prototype though.


    http://kotaku.com/5890275/is-this-a-photo-of-valves-rumored-console
  19. n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    8,827 (4.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,401
    They say it probably WON'T be the baseline specs... it makes sense that they are trying to test it with something more powerful first

    I wonder if mobile GPU is a smart way to go... IMO a discrete desktop GPU would do better. Perhaps it's too expensive?
  20. marsey99

    marsey99

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,467 (0.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    262
    valve see a opening where alienware do too, a cheap all in 1 box that is a gaming pc is what the industry needs.

    nothing new here but i am interested to see if the steam name helps it sell as others have tried this before and failed.
  21. xenocide

    xenocide

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    2,092 (1.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    451
    Crazyeye sees the major problem with "Gaming" PC's that I do. They are always lopsided. Why do they make you get an i7-2600k baseline with a GTS520 quite often? Why not offer an i5-2400 or i3-2100 with say a GTX550 or HD6850?

    If Valve steps in and starts offering balanced gaming PC's for a decent price, they will change the entire market.
  22. fusionblu

    fusionblu

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2010
    Messages:
    256 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    33
    Location:
    London, England, UK
    I could see this changing the gaming industry by quite a bit with the specifications since the planned specifications for the other consoles to come are weaker; assuming that "SteamBox" will run Window games (and not a custom platform) and would be connected to the current Steam service, while maintaining a competitive price against the consoles (doesn't have to be cheaper, but at least close to the console price range), I could see this introducing a large number of people into PC gaming and maybe make PC gaming more popular than console gaming (possibly ahead of Razer's predictions) if Valve gets the console ready within a year (ideally) or two for sale.

    Clearly I can see Valve using a custom gaming OS to keep things secure and hopefully a custom gaming Windows OS which is mostly stripped down of all unnecessary applications, but has enhanced services to both existing needed applications as well as added applications that are needed too. The only thing that can be done now is wait and see what comes of this with the news to come.
  23. wrathchild_67

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Messages:
    233 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    This seems like a huge mistake to me. They should be competing with Onlive, not making a cut down PC. Streaming is the future.
  24. [H]@RD5TUFF

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2009
    Messages:
    5,615 (3.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Very interested! :rolleyes:
  25. newtekie1

    newtekie1 Semi-Retired Folder

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    19,484 (6.35/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5,725
    People that want to play PC exclusives but don't want to shell out massive money for a gaming PC. The idiots that thing you need a $2000 Alienware to play PC games. So basically console gamers...:laugh:
    25 Million points folded for TPU

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page