1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

VIA Developing DirectX 11 IGP Chipset, Quad-Core x86 Processor for 2011

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Sep 6, 2010.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,435 (11.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,619
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    VIA, in its recent announcement about posting a net loss of US $45 million for 1H 2010, revealed plans about future products and manufacturing process transitions with which it hopes to return to profits. These include release of dual-core VIA Nano processors based on a new manufacturing process due for released later this year, the new VN11 chipset that will embed DirectX 11 compliant integrated graphics, which it will released next year. The company also announced that it will release a new quad-core CPU in 2011, which is the company's first. VIA is only the third company that is an active license-holder of the x86 instruction set. Even as much larger x86 manufacturers such as Intel and AMD battle it out, VIA designs processors for low-power applications such as embedded industrial computers, and netbook/ULPC processors such as the VIA Nano and VIA C3.

    [​IMG]

    Source: DigiTimes
  2. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,124 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    575
    Interesting.

    Btw I'm pretty sure AMD, Intel, and Via are the only ones who hold that x86 patent.
  3. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,178 (5.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    I think only those three develop x86 chips in commercial quantities. Patent is held by Intel I believe, licensed to AMD and VIA
  4. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,435 (11.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,619
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
  5. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,178 (5.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
  6. _JP_

    _JP_

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2010
    Messages:
    2,681 (1.68/day)
    Thanks Received:
    734
    Location:
    Portugal
    I hope this keeps them in business, a new chipset would be nice too. The AM3/+ and the i7/5/3s could use frankenstein (budget) boards like there were for socket 775 and AM2/+. Or maybe even high end, heck for them the sky used to be the limit, then they went low power and now have profit drop.
  7. Cuzza

    Cuzza New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,318 (0.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    207
    Location:
    New Zealand
    VIA quad core! I'd buy that just for novelty value
  8. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,124 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    575
  9. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,606 (5.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,243
    IMO the DX11 integrated graphics is a total waste of time for something that fits inside a small notebook/netbook or even ITC - whats the point of adding DX11 support if the chip cant play any DX11 titles Competently?
  10. koorosh New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2009
    Messages:
    39 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Location:
    Iran
    With intel and amd entering the low power market, it's beginning of an end for via.
  11. ToTTenTranz

    ToTTenTranz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    865 (0.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Location:
    Porto

    Compute shaders (duh).
  12. TheLaughingMan

    TheLaughingMan

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    4,998 (2.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,291
    Location:
    Marietta, GA USA
    Primary consumers of this line of products are.....well....stupid. Being able to put a number on a product line allows them to use it as a buzz word like 4G, Wireless N+, etc. While it will be largely pointless for most of the buyers, it will still help drive sales.
  13. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,606 (5.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,243
    theyve been in the low power marker for a while already
  14. TheLaughingMan

    TheLaughingMan

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    4,998 (2.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,291
    Location:
    Marietta, GA USA
  15. Perseid New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    156 (0.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Location:
    Wisconsin, USA
  16. wolf

    wolf Performance Enthusiast

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    5,541 (2.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    842
    via quad core.... interesting.... *strokes chin beard*
  17. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,124 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    575
    Problem is even though the companies that got bought had a x86 license, it doesn't get transferred to the buying company. It becomes dead basically.
  18. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,796 (3.63/day)
    Thanks Received:
    545
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    honestly wikipedia is not considered a reliable source due to anyone being able to edit it. However, having said that, thanks fo rthat link because I Thought those three were the only ones as well.

    Cyrix is still around? Thought they were done.
  19. TheLaughingMan

    TheLaughingMan

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    4,998 (2.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,291
    Location:
    Marietta, GA USA
    While true, the companies that did most of the buying out were Intel, VIA, and IBM who all already had and still have patients or license to the x86 architecture.

    And I thought Cyrix was bought out by VIA in the 90's?

    Edit: Sold to National Semiconductors by VIA after VIA acquired them. NS stopped making CPU's and most of the engineers at Cyrix moved on.

    http://www.cpu-info.com/index2.php?mainid=Cyrix
    Last edited: Sep 7, 2010
  20. Roph

    Roph

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    377 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    106
    It's all very well VIA making these things (I'm for them, I really like the Nano), but they need to get these products out there more.

    It's very hard to find Nano based products, whereas the market is flooded with poorly performing Atoms with rubbish IGPs. Atom + ION (Geforce 9400M) solved that a little, I guess :ohwell:

    Put some more effort into marketing, VIA :shadedshu
  21. mastrdrver

    mastrdrver

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2009
    Messages:
    3,124 (1.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    575
    I don't know how well an Atom like Via production will do again AMD's Bobcat. Bobcat is going to drive Intel out of the market because they don't have anything close to Bobcat coming and Atom can't be modified enough to even meet up again Bobcat.
  22. Baum

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Messages:
    469 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    39
    Location:
    Germany,Hannover
    hah IDT i still remember my 160Mhz IDT x86 CPU good run for its money like my cyrix did^^
    Via is nice as a competitor, they had nice frankenstein boards in their via itx lineup :)

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page