1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Viacom sues YouTube for $1 billion dollars USD

Discussion in 'News' started by zekrahminator, Mar 13, 2007.

  1. zekrahminator

    zekrahminator McLovin

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Messages:
    9,113 (2.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    321
    Location:
    My house.
    Some people claimed it was bound to happen. Some people hoped it never would. Pirates didn't care one way or another, and continued uploading illegally-obtained clips to YouTube. There have been tons of rumors regarding YouTube getting sued, and Viacom can proudly claim that they are the first company to actually do it. Viacom was unable to reach a licensing agreement with YouTube, and ordered their clips off YouTube. YouTube attempted to comply, but piracy appeared to prevail. The lawsuit details 160,000 clips still on the site, and wants $1 billion USD in damages. Viacom claims that YouTube's business model, which is "based on building traffic and selling advertising off of unlicensed content, is clearly illegal and is in obvious conflict with copyright laws". YouTube claims that they have done everything in their power to remove Viacom's content from their website, and is almost certain the courts will agree.

    Source: MSN Money
     
  2. J0N

    J0N New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2007
    Messages:
    448 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    England
    Youtube really have been trying their best. Over the last few months almost every Viacom owned video has been removed within a few days! So I very much doubt Viacom will win this, and even if they do it definately wont be to the tune of $1 billion.

    Luckily I got to watch Jackass 2 first though! ;)
     
  3. DMSMac_Consult New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    28 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    I hate that copyright holders are winning this battle, particularly when older content is involved. I loved how I could go up on YouTube and catch old episodes of TV shows that aren't even airing anymore -- now a lot of that stuff is gone, and while legal services may have better quality video, they're also pricey. $1.99 or more an episode for something that was free or nearly-free to watch on TV is outrageous.
     
  4. Leon2ky New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Messages:
    57 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Damages? Don't make me laugh.
     
  5. J0N

    J0N New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2007
    Messages:
    448 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    England
    Oh well, theres plenty more YouTube type sites that they don't know about yet. And when the corporations find out about those sites, there will be even more! Just a bit of a blow for YouTube who have built up from nothing to dominate the market!
     
  6. C.Ash

    C.Ash New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    204 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Columbia, Missouri
    This is the last stroke! Viacom must DIE!!

    For months they have raided Youtube, deleting every video that had anything to do with their channels. Their ruthless renegade and heartless crusade has destroyed a very important part of Youtube and has gotten thousands of people banned. People who took the time to upload what some of us cannot view otherwise.

    Youtube's policy and clear and is the reason why it avoids lawsuits.
    Youtube agrees to delete any video at the request of the "owner" company.

    Viacom has gone too far! There is no reason to take "their" videos off of Youtube. It isnt hurting anyone but the hardworking people who take their time to upload bits and pieces of certain clips (much like every news and comedy show does) for the rest of us to view.
    This dosent hurt their rating. This dosent hurt them in ANY way.
    They are just being bastards and asserting their right to take the videos off for NO reason.

    So many people have had their videos removed that many of them are switching over to a site called "DailyMotion", which the crusades have not ravaged.. yet.

    The fact that they are suing Youtube, when Youtube's policy cannot be any more clear is testiment to how stupid and evil they are.
     
  7. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    They should leave TV shows IF commercials are left in place.

    On one note has anyone noticed if you use a song(Like a NIN song) in a video that you made it will be removed because of the song.

    ---
    I think a lot of users will go over to filehost in the end.
     
  8. Grings

    Grings New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    184
    Location:
    Blighty
    a billion damages?, meh!, if i was the judge i'd reverse the charges on viacom, for damaging youtubes reputation (the good old lost potential earnings gumph the riaa love bleating on about)
     
  9. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,797 (3.57/day)
    Thanks Received:
    546
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    Man, I really need to look at Youtube more often. I didnt know they had whole movies and tv shows
     
  10. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    At one time you could watch sessions of tv shows.
     
  11. J0N

    J0N New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2007
    Messages:
    448 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    England

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page