1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

WCG/F@H: Crunching for the Cure... or are we?

Discussion in 'Folding@Home' started by hat, May 21, 2010.

  1. hat

    hat Maximum Overclocker

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2006
    Messages:
    16,999 (5.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,086
    Location:
    Ohio
    BUCK NASTY says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  2. NastyHabits

    NastyHabits

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,087 (0.43/day)
    Thanks Received:
    630
    Location:
    Oakland, CA
    I agree with your post. Thankfully, HFM.net shows us when we get failed WU's.

    I've had to back down the clocks on one of my machines even though it passed all the tests you mentioned. I'm personally more interested in stability over max overclock. For example: I always back off my CPU 0.1 GHz from the tested max stable overclock. It just seems to work better that way, especially on the PC's that CPU crunch, while GPU folding.

    I also treat my GPU's the same way. In fact, given the new WU's like 548's, I've backed the cards down 2 notches. (I really don't like getting EUE's). :mad:
     
    BUCK NASTY says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU More than 25k PPD

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page