1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

WD Red drives for OS?

Discussion in 'Storage' started by Eric_Cartman, Feb 20, 2013.

  1. Eric_Cartman

    Eric_Cartman

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    587 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    My hard drive in my computer is dying.

    This morning when I turned my computer on it complained that there wasn't a boot drive and my hard drive wasn't showing up in the BIOS.

    I turn the computer off and on a few times and it finally recognized the drive and booted.

    It is still running and I'm typing this on it right now, but I'm afraid to turn it back off.

    I ran HDTune on it and it reported several bad sectors.

    So I want to replace the drive today.

    I went to my local computer shop and they had a few drives in stock, I'm looking at 1TB drives.

    My options are basically a Seagate Barracuda, another WD Green, or a WD Red.

    Now there is no way I'm getting a Seagate because their trash, so that just leave the WD Green and the WD Red.

    However, the shop owner said that the WD Red drive can't be used as an OS drive.

    He said that WD put some kind of software on the drive that makes it only work as a data drive and it will only work in a NAS.

    I also remember reading someplace, maybe it was even someone on here, saying that the Red drives don't have the normal error correction that normal hard drives have, instead it relies on the error correction of the RAID controller.

    So if you use it as a standard hard drive and there was an error like a bad sector all the data would be lost but a normal hard drive would correct the error itself and keep working.

    But the Red drive was actually $25 cheaper than the Green, so I'd prefer to get that if possible.

    But I want to get the facts straight about them first.

    The shop owner said if I bought the Red drive he wouldn't take a return if I couldn't get an OS installed on it and I don't want to risk data even if I did get it working so I need your advise.
     
  2. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,732 (9.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,199
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    They will be fine for OS drive. We have one at work running in a machine that the OEM drive died. No issues so far.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  3. Sasqui

    Sasqui

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    7,756 (2.37/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,481
    Location:
    Manchester, NH
  4. AthlonX2

    AthlonX2 HyperVtXâ„¢

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2006
    Messages:
    7,223 (2.42/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,695
    The WD Red drives have alot of power saving features and are designed to run 24/7. I dont see any issues using it as a OS drive.
     
  5. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,280
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Choose red/green/black for desktop.

    http://wdc.custhelp.com/app/answers...2LzEvdGltZS8xMzYxMzg2ODAzL3NpZC94eUFidWxqbA==

    Any drive will work fine in any environment, but each has different firmware features and block size, dependent on the intended deployment. WD also has RE Edition drives for RAID use, again, with different firmware features.
     
    MxPhenom 216 says thanks.
  6. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,116 (6.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,314
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    ^^^This

    Western Digital Red drives are made for NAS and RAID storage setups on mind. Chose a blue or black drive for your system.

    But looks like you only have Seagate, Green, or the Red for choices. Honestly I would get the Seagate, or the Green if its cheaper. But if your using it as an OS drive the Green will be slower since it only runs at 5900rpm, while the Seagate probably runs at 7200rpm.
     
  7. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,280
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    I tried Green drives for OS, and my son uses one. Not recommended, IMHO. Blue for cheap desktop, black for performance.

    The RED will work anyway, just not it's intended platform.
     
  8. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,116 (6.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,314
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Yeah, I wouldnt use a Green drive for an OS either haha. Thats why I was leaning more towards recommending the Seagate. Especially if its the same price or cheaper.
     
  9. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,732 (9.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,199
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    Really the RED is the best choice since its build for long term usage.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  10. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,280
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    That's not what WD told me. Anyway, Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB is faster than RED 3TB drives in some workloads(4k). The Seagate can also handle more IOPs per second, as can the Green drive. Not sure how the other Red drives perform, I'm sure paltter size and such will have an effect too.


    http://www.storagereview.com/western_digital_red_nas_hard_drive_review_wd30efrx
     
  11. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,732 (9.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,199
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    Maybe its just the added error detection in raid?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,280
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Honestly, I'm not exactly sure. But, what I can say is what WD told over the phone, and note what the website for these products says.

    The black and Velociraptor drives have the longest warranty, 5 years. WD red is 3 years, and others are 2 years. So to me, this says that Black and Velociraptor actually have the highest build quality.

    WD also recommend the Red under desktop RAID, and others for single use, and this separation is why I gave Phenom a hard time, since he was buying a board without RAID support(plus he planned RAID since day one).


    A drive is a drive, and any will work.

    [​IMG]

    http://www.wdc.com/en/products/internal/desktop/


    As linked above by me, WD will not warranty Black, Green, or Blue drives used in RAID. They will with the RED. It's kind of a hybrid drive, almost, in that regard.
     
  13. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,116 (6.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,314
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    And then I sold the board I did get, and got a H77 board, and now running the 2 red drives I got in Raid 1 via hardware. :)
     
  14. brandonwh64

    brandonwh64 Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2009
    Messages:
    18,732 (9.84/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6,199
    Location:
    Chatsworth, GA
    Ahhh that is a good point dave. I have two blues with the 5yr warranty and I have a black as well.
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  15. Sir B. Fannybottom

    Sir B. Fannybottom

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2,944 (2.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,215
    Also, everyone knows that red means its fast.
     
  16. cadaveca

    cadaveca My name is Dave

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    14,098 (4.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,280
    Location:
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Doesn't green mean go, and red, stop?

    Oh, right, no license.


    :roll:
     
    MxPhenom 216 says thanks.
  17. thebluebumblebee

    thebluebumblebee

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,223 (1.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,740
    Ironic, huh?
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  18. Eric_Cartman

    Eric_Cartman

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    587 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    I have a green drive now and it isn't slow.

    So I'm not opposed to getting another green drive for my OS.

    But it sounds like the Red is going to be fine.

    So I'll go ahead and go with that since it is cheapest.

    It would seem that way.

    But the drive I'm using now was originally in an emachine.

    It is a first generation Green drive and it is date stamped 2007.

    That makes it 6 years old at this point.

    It has also been dropped off of a table and still worked perfectly.

    I've never had a seagate last more than 6 months.

    The last seagate I had had to be sent 5 times before the warranty finally ran out.

    And that drive had a 2 year warranty.

    Now that they've drop to a 1 year warranty their drives are even worse.
     
  19. Sir B. Fannybottom

    Sir B. Fannybottom

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2,944 (2.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,215
    Why do you hate me?
     
  20. lilhasselhoffer

    lilhasselhoffer

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,671 (1.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,036
    Location:
    East Coast, USA
    I'm currently running a 4 drive RAID 5 array of red drives. I'm in the middle of encrypting them using true crypt. Now the bad part.


    A new 2 TB drive, 64 MB cache, on an Intel Z77 chipset (SATA II) maxes out at 15MB/s in the array. The highest access speed I got was about 20 MB/s. I'm looking at 4 days to fully encrypt the array.


    Note two things. It's supposedly a SATA III drive. Z77 obviously doesn't offer this configuration (in RAID at least). The second is that I'm running a stock clocked 2500k. More than enough arse to do all the heavy lifting and remain below 28C on each core.


    Can I recommend red drives for your OS; no. Can you get away with them; probably. Has having a SSD spoiled me terribly; absolutely.
     
  21. Eric_Cartman

    Eric_Cartman

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2007
    Messages:
    587 (0.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    45
    I don't know why you are getting such bad speeds lilhasselhoffer.

    I bought the Red drive and am now using it as my OS drive with no problems.

    It is definitely faster than my old WD Green drive I was using, but that drive was a first generation Green.

    Here is my ATTO benchmark I ran on the drive.

    It seems pretty respectable for a hard drive.

    [​IMG]

    Maybe the onboard RAID isn't as up to the task as you think it is.

    I don't think having SATA III would matter at all.

    These numbers for this drive are barely going past SATA I and aren't even close to the limit of SATA II.

    So unless other drives are way way faster SATA III is useless with a hard drive.
     

    Attached Files:

  22. AsRock

    AsRock TPU addict

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2007
    Messages:
    11,099 (4.10/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,755
    Location:
    US
    If i was going get another WD drive i would get a Black hands no question about it.. With buying SSD's over the last few years i only use any of the 7 WD's as backups now but i did have a 2 blues to before switching and they suck ass although good for backing data on them and disconnecting them for a later date...
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page