1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

What do you pick - E21xx OR E7200 OR Others, and what RAM?

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by Wai_Wai, Jul 21, 2008.

  1. Wai_Wai New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    26 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    What do you pick - E21xx OR E7200 OR Others, and what RAM?

    I'm a budget overclocker. I'm also a price/performance geek.
    My current pick is E21xx which is very cheap and can overclock to 3.0Ghz easily with stock cooler. I'm also interested in the new E7200 but it's 100% expensive at my local stores (I don't buy online!).
    My choice of the coming motherboard is Foxconn P35A-S.

    1. What's the difference between E21xx and E7200?
    As far as I know, the only differences are cache size and clock multiplier. Anything else?

    2. Normally speaking, how far can E7200 go on stock cooling? How good is the overclockabilty of E7200?
    I plan to use its stock cooler only. I don't plan to spend extra bucks on aftermarket coolers unless it's proved to be worth it, price/performance-wise.

    3. How much RAM should I get? My choices:
    3GB: 1GB + 1GB + 1GB
    3GB: 2GB + 1GB
    4GB: 2GB + 2GB
    Does it hurt if I mix different RAM brand, or different size/timings of RAM?

    I'm using Windows XP Pro.
    I need to receive a lot of streaming data (10+). I may do occasional video & audio editing/recording. I don't often play games.

    DDR2 should be obsolete in 1-2 years. I believe I have to dump DDR2 when I upgrade after 3 years or so. So I don't think it's worth buying too much RAM even it's cheap.

    Dual channel shouldn't be a concern. Memory seems not to be the bottleneck. Hardly any application needs so much bandwidth.

    What do you think?
    calvary1980 says thanks.
  2. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,830 (1.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    1) The cores are different, the 21xx is allendale (65nm), the 7200 is wolfdale (45nm), and far superior.
    2) 4ghz usually. Over that for some.
    3) 4gb 2x2gb if your on vista and play a lot of games and encode a lot and stuff. 2x1gb if your just going for pure oc. It depends as for mixing. I would avoid it if possible.

    e7200 is way, way better than the allendales. Just dropped the prices too.
    calvary1980 says thanks.
  3. yogurt_21

    yogurt_21

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    4,300 (1.40/day)
    Thanks Received:
    541
    Location:
    AZ
    definetly e7200 no doubts about it, not other cpu seems to clock as high or perform the same for the money.
  4. francis511

    francis511

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2006
    Messages:
    2,547 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    271
    Location:
    N.Ireland
    Cache makes a HUGE difference in that case. Superior cooling = better overclock nearly always. Dual channel = better i.e. 2x2 gb or 2x1 gb
  5. FatForester New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2007
    Messages:
    971 (0.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    151
    Yea, go for at least the e7200. I think the e8400 just got a price cut as well, and that's an even bigger upgrade over the e7200. It's worth checking out.
  6. Wai_Wai New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    26 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    What are the advantages of wolfdale (45nm) over allendale (65nm)?
    EDIT: Actually E2xxx is using Conroe core (65nm).

    Even with stock coolers? :twitch:

    My main concern is how far ca it go if I use stock coolers only.

    I don't plan to use aftermarket coolers because (1) it seems to be against my purpose (making a good performance/price build) (2) I don't know much about aftermarket coolers.

    Apart from dual-channel, what problems do I face if I mix and match different RAMs (in size/timings/brand)?

    How much is it now?
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2008
  7. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,830 (1.82/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638

    Cooler, less voltages, more cache, faster clock for clock (3ghz wolfie> 3ghz ally), and better oc's.



    Well it could w/ stock cooler probably, but I wouldn't, the temps would be a little high. You can get a great hs for $30 that will oc and keep temps low, like this or this. If your really opposed to getting aftermarket, I'd say 3.5 or so would be pretty attainable on stock. Either way, the wolfdale will be cooler as it uses less voltages to get to it's speeds. You'll need high voltages to get the ally's to those speeds.



    Well, sometimes compatibility can become a problem. Then oc'ing. I think dual-channel should work fine even w/ mix, but oc'ing mixed ram w/ different timings is trouble.

    $125 in the US.
    Wai_Wai says thanks.
  8. Wai_Wai New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2008
    Messages:
    26 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Sounds great. :D

    BTW E21** uses little power at stock (this is one of the reasons I may want it). It seems to use slightly less power than E7200 altho it's 65nm. But I don't know how much power consumption it will be when overclocked.

    E7200 attracts me too. Budget and low power too.

    What's the safe voltage for E7200 (45nm-based CPU)?


    Well it's okay with aftermarket coolers if it's worth it price/performance-wise. I don't think about it because I know little about aftermarket coolers. But AFAIK I need to buy at least US$20-30 coolers for about 200mhz or less gain. This is bad price/performance-wise.

    Is it possible to buy cheap coolers (eg ~US$10) and how much does it help?


    It's easy to get the same speed. I may not be able to match all 4 timings (?-?-?-?) if I mix different sizes.
    Does different voltage matter (eg 1.8v RAM and 2.2v RAM)?


    One question:
    Is single or double-sided RAM still a concern in today's world? If so, how can I know if it's single/double-sided and which one should I get?
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2008
  9. 50bmg New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2008
    Messages:
    53 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    I have run my e7200 at 3.8G for months. 1.33v, never exceeds 55c on air. I am using a golden orb II. That HS&F isnt the best and my cpu stays cool.

    GA-EX38-DS4 @ 400Mhz fsb
    E7200 @ 3.8G, 1.33v
    2x2G 800Mhz patriot DDR2 2.0v
    500G seagate Sata 2, 250G seagate sata
    2x ati 3870 crossfired
  10. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (3.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    Most RAM is double-sided these days and for comparison with the stock cooler at stock settings my q66 runs at 40 odd degrees idle while with my aftermarket cooler it runs at 3.8ghz about 30 and 35 load.
  11. xubidoo New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    882 (0.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Location:
    Lancs,UK
    +1 for the E7200... good performer ,ive got mine on a moderate oc of 3.2ghz with voltage slightly above stock.

    having had both the E2160 and the E7200 in my 2nd PC in the last few months I have to say the E7200 is without doubt the better performer.
  12. JC316

    JC316 Knows what makes you tick

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    9,362 (3.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    903
    Wow, old thread. Anyway, the E5200 is probably the best buy for anyone that is looking. mine does 4.0GHZ@ 1.55V, which oddly enough runs much cooler than the other 45NM quads, barely breaking 64*C.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page