1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

What would you prefer ? Q6700 or Q8200 ?

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by Yukikaze, Mar 27, 2009.

?

Which CPU would you prefer ?

Poll closed Apr 3, 2009.
  1. Q6700

    87.5%
  2. Q8200

    12.5%
  1. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (0.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    Hello, I am upgrading my computers for some more processor muscle, with the main rig getting a Q9650, but I am thinking what quad core to put in place of my E2200 in the other rig. The prices here put the Q6700 as about 10$ cheaper than the Q8200 and those are the cheapest Intel quads here. The question is, what would you prefer ? The Q6700 or the Q8200 ?

    I am leaning towards the Q6700, but I am still undecided. I am running my second rig silent, with two 500RPM 120mm case fans, a passively cooled 9600GT and an IFX-14 on the CPU (fanless, as well), so please take that into consideration. My E2200 is running 2.93Ghz at stock volts in that setup and I will OC whichever quad that goes into that rig as far as it will go on stock volts, as well.
     
  2. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (2.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    Q6700. More cache and its faster anyway.

    I can run my Q6600 on a fanless setup just make sure speedstep is enabled.
     
  3. r9

    r9

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,144 (0.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    284
    Q6700
     
  4. Homeless

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    1,026 (0.30/day)
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Location:
    USA
    Q6700 easily. I wouldn't touch the Q8xxx series
     
  5. 1Kurgan1

    1Kurgan1 The Knife in your Back

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    10,367 (4.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,393
    Location:
    Duluth, Minnesota
    Yep Q6700, the Q8200 is a gimp proc.
     
  6. Marineborn

    Marineborn New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,144 (0.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    312
    +1 for the q6700
     
  7. zithe

    zithe

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    Messages:
    3,091 (1.26/day)
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Location:
    North Chili, NY
    Q8200 is for overkill HTPCs and people who want just a basic quad. It should game fine, but you probably won't get a huge OC out of it.

    Q6700 ftw.
     
  8. ShadowFold

    ShadowFold New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2007
    Messages:
    16,921 (6.44/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,644
    Location:
    Omaha, NE
    Q8200 sucks. I would rather have a E5200 or something like that.
    Q6700's are still the shit!
     
  9. 3870x2

    3870x2

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2008
    Messages:
    4,875 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    690
    Location:
    Joplin, Mo
    I don't know who voted for the Q8200, but in no way, in no test whatsoever, will the Q8200 match the Q6700. I think, stock, the Q8200 is cooler?¿?
     
  10. TRIPTEX_CAN

    TRIPTEX_CAN

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2008
    Messages:
    3,305 (1.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    723
    Location:
    BC.CAN
    Depends on price I guess, the Q8200 would be cooler running but the Q6700 would smoke it once any overclocking was attempted.
     
  11. Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    42,731 (11.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    9,949
    Q67. Higher multi, more cache, lower stock FSB... its better performing and far easier to OC.

    as for the silence issue, trust me... if i hear my PC, its too loud - so i replace stuff. and i have good hearing.
     
  12. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (0.98/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    Thanks everyone. The Q6700 it is, then ! :rockout:
     
  13. CDdude55

    CDdude55 Crazy 4 TPU!!!

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2007
    Messages:
    8,179 (2.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,277
    Location:
    Virginia
    I voted Q6700, mostly because my mobo supports it and not the Q8200.lol
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page