1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Who'll be the better president?

Discussion in 'TPU Frontpage Polls' started by W1zzard, Oct 1, 2008.

?

Who'll be the better president?

Poll closed Oct 6, 2008.
  1. Barack Obama

    1,290 vote(s)
    57.9%
  2. John McCain

    333 vote(s)
    14.9%
  3. But I want George W. Bush

    177 vote(s)
    7.9%
  4. Don't care

    429 vote(s)
    19.2%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bigjohn

    Bigjohn

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    400 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Location:
    Woodstock, GA USA
    Some prisons are indeed privately managed and operated... and i'd encourage COMPETITION between companies as to who can manage them best. If you do a crappy job, along comes company X to take away your contract....
     
  2. magibeg

    magibeg

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    Messages:
    2,000 (0.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    203
    To my knowledge though the US was never #1 when it came to healthcare. There are many good reasons why countries high up on HDI also have a healthcare system run by the government. The other side of the coin behind capitolism is price gouging. Regardless of how lean private sectors try to make things theres still the rich executives that need to be paid. Just because theres competition doesn't mean its going to be cheaper than a not-for-profit alternative.
     
  3. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,830 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    FAIL.
    Your quoting a politician's (who's trying to be elected president) campaign website as pure fact? That's laughable. Most section's start w/ "John McCain believes".:rolleyes: The article, although you for some reason think b/c it is not from your end of the political spectrum it is completely invalid, offers an outside, scholastic analysis of the plan. Right or wrong, it holds more water than your link.
     
    TUngsten says thanks.
  4. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,596 (6.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,519
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Two years ago, I would have had to go 250 miles and pay $40,000+ for a stone removal operation. Now I can go 40 miles and pay $2500 for the exact same operation. That is capitalism at work. :p

    I can't find any sources that aren't biased that compare the plans...

    This is all I could find it isn't very thorough at all:
    http://www.columbiaspectator.com/node/56347

    Judging by the back and fourth, I think both plans would work (they both expand the safety net); however, their approach differs vastly: one involves expanding government healthcare; the other involves finding the best healthcare plan for you and help you pay for it. I made it clear which I think is best. :p
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 22, 2008
    Bigjohn says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  5. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,830 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    So is illegitimate claims rejections, FDA rushing unready/untested drugs to the market, once wealthy individuals filing bankruptcy as result of an incident outside of their own fruition (healthcare related), ect. Other results of capitalistic healthcare. Good and bad to everything. :ohwell:

    Yeah you probably won't find anything totally unbiased. That would be an impossibility. Still, an outsiders scholarly paper of analysis holds more water than a campaign site, regardless of affiliation.
     
  6. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,596 (6.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,519
    Location:
    IA, USA
    There can't be good without something bad to compare it against. ;)

    Inevitably, some will fall through the cracks and in those few cases is when government needs to step up. The idea is to get people back on their feet again so they can get back to paying taxes again. XD
     
    Crunching for Team TPU
  7. Rammsteiner New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2005
    Messages:
    168 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    42
    There is not supposed to be two sides of an issue. Especially now with the economic issue people only look at the economical aspect of the candidate. That's just stupid.

    In a (more) democratic country you've more larger parties and a few smaller ones which often dont have a real role. But those larger parties can form up in total and form a government and balance each others ideas (if not all the elected parties actually were from the same side, but that barely happens).

    Now people are going to make a short term choice... There's no point in doing that.

    Indeed, people fighting USA forces are no terrorists per se but could be soldiers as well. And Im pretty sure the USA army did not get in Iraq Serbia/wherever by accident:wtf:

    That's a weird story really, especially since Bin Laden already did attacks on USA before the Iraq/Kuwait war.

    What about this, Bin Laden and USA had a deal to fight together, USA did promises but never made those come true, pissing of Bin Laden? Seriously, current situation and 9/11 are a bit deeper than your argument.

    Why wouldnt I like the police? Only if they arrested me or whatever, but otherwise I dont give a fuck what they're doing. Apparently those people want USA out no matter what. Besides that there's still a huge group in Iraq who support Hussein and if possible would re-elect him.

    Maybe he was sent to USA's concentration camps:p

    You seem to read things with different contexts. Of course those soldiers dont say "Hey lets commit suicide" and then Leroy into a hostile camp. Point is that the whole war against the Taliban is one big suicide operation because you wont gain anything and only lose it. That's what I mean.

    I know, and thus it's not a really communistic country anymore, otherwise that wasnt accepted.

    But there are people who did not chose to screw up their life.

    Also there are people who work even harder but still get less money without making wrong choises. So your point is not really legit.

    And next year you've to go to China because all hospitals are broke:p
     
  8. farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,830 (1.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Of course, it's a judgment call. Obama's plan I think is exactly that, to catch the few that fall through the cracks and make sure they are not cheated. The people who are already good are unaffected (supposedly, and whether the plan will actually go into effect is another story). I actually would like to go a little further myself though, the FDA in it's current state scares the crap out of me.
     
  9. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    That's all well and good if you've got the money in the first place. :shadedshu

    I'm just not understanding the anti-NHS advocates here -- don't you think America is a great country? The "best in the world?" Don't you think America could make an NHS system work better than any other country, no matter how good they are (and their health systems are good, better than America's health system).

    If America truly is so great, then do it, and do it better. Give every single person in your country free health care, and do it free of charge and make it the best health care in the world.
     
  10. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,119 (5.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    In most counties that have money around the world it would of been free.
     
  11. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,596 (6.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,519
    Location:
    IA, USA
    There needs to be at least two sides to every issue. If you are in unanimous agreement, obviously you aren't looking in the right places for an opinion.


    Oh, really? Then you know something I don't. Do tell.

    No, not really. Bin Laden is holding a grudge against the USA just like Bush was holding a grudge against Hussein. Bin Laden was writing a story and needed an antagonist. At the time, USA was the best choice in his eyes.

    Yeah, we pissed of bin Laden alright...by being better than him. Since there is no way he could get up to our level before he dies, he tries to tear us down to his level...


    They are a sign of authority--everything you shouldn't do. People are naturally intimidated by that. Iraqi's are intimidated seeing state of the art military equipment flying past their house and troops decked out in full body armor with a gun the size of a small child, as they should be. You really don't appreciate them until the enemy fires at you and they return fire, in which case, they provide a sense of security that would have become panic had they not been there.

    Since the violence has gone down considerably, the intimidation is present without the sense of security so, people would rather see them disappear. That is understandable; however, it has to be done diligently in order to not lose controlled ground.

    They never had "elections" in Iraq while Hussein was in power. I doubt that claim on basis anyway. :/


    The Taliban is no longer in power in Afghanistan and they haven't been for many years. So, they want their power back but they will die trying.


    It is very communist in leadership. The economic elements are really only present in the large cities of China where the communist leadership has "blessed" certain business owners to operate in a capitalist fashion (money, money, money). The farther away you get from the cities, the more apparent the communist control becomes (which is the majority, by the way).


    The place that costs $40,000 is ranked either #1 or #2 hospital in the world (Mayo Clinic). When treated there, you have about 3 different doctors and 9 in training with a massive support staff of nurses and the like. All of which are probably paid at least six figure digits.

    The place that costs $2500 has one doctor and a handful of nurses.

    One is lean and mean, the other is big and slow; however, sometimes you need big and slow...but hey, I have both options available to me. ;)

    The problem with Obama's plan is that, because it is leveraged against taxpayer money, the private industries can't compete. As his government healthcare grows, the private healthcare dies. As a result, the government ads even more debt to a 10 trillion dollar deficit. We are in a position right here and right now to prevent creating another Medicaid/Medicare crisis 30 years down the road. That's why I feel his plan is fundamentally incorrect. It is not sustainable.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 22, 2008
    Crunching for Team TPU
  12. TUngsten

    TUngsten

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2006
    Messages:
    1,044 (0.36/day)
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Location:
    CT, USA
    BJ:
    Indeed, and in fact FordGT90guy said posted the same link already, and got the same response. It suggests that you're simply looking for material to object to without actually reading any of the posts in between. Fail.

    I think you need to make a list of all the adjectives that you consider to fall under the umbrella of "socialist" or "pseudo-socialist" :roll:
     
  13. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,596 (6.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,519
    Location:
    IA, USA
    I sure as hell don't but I have good health insurance. :)


    Yes. Yes. Yes, as long as it doesn't use the federal government as a crutch. We can establish a healthcare system that is the best and completely sustainable in a capitalist market. There's nothing "great" about Uncle Sam taking over.


    Nothing is free, ever. Not freedom, not fun, not health care. People make a living providing those services and they need to get money somehow. Not to mention, these are highly trained individuals and the profession of a doctor is one of the most respected in our society. They deserve a fat pay check. The trick is to find something that is affordable, catches those that fall, promotes competition, and is sustainable. If we come up with something that meets those four criteria, we'll have a winner.
     
    Bigjohn says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  14. Bigjohn

    Bigjohn

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    400 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Location:
    Woodstock, GA USA
    America is a great country. Best in the WORLD, IMHO. But it's great because of it's people and their initiative, not because of the entitlement class who would hold a gun to the head of a CEO and say " all the money above that much is MINE"...
     
  15. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    Sigh -- this is a fundamental difference of opinions. To me, where there is "competition," there is selfishness, and where there is selfishness, there are not people looking out for other peoples' needs above their own, which is what a good healthcare system should be all about.

    Trust me, buddy -- I'm all about "competition" where it doesn't involve life and death. However, in the matter of healthcare -- and pretty much healthcare alone -- I'd like to think that people are more than just a line of numbers on some CEO's balance sheet. I'm saddened to see that you think differently.

    Yeah, yeah -- nobody said anything about entitlements, besides that of "life," which America's own historical documents (the US Declaration of Independence) say you're "entitled" to, anyway. Stop trying to change the subject by constantly bringing up this class warfare garbage. You sound like you're straight out of the pages of an Ayn Rand novel, and it's starting to get a little old.

    You know what? Use some of that "initiative" and give all Americans health care without them having to fret over "choosing" a provider. Do that and get back to me.
     
  16. Bigjohn

    Bigjohn

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    400 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Location:
    Woodstock, GA USA
  17. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,674 (5.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,506
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    I made it personal because it IS personal to a lot of people, and who are we to judge which children are "unwanted", yes of course some are unwanted but many are not. Yes of course, it is either a mistake or deliberate, if it's deliberate it is unlikely that the children are unwanted as you mentioned anyways. Don't get me wrong, I am a great beleiver as it appears you are, and Big John (and I would guess most of us here) that people should earn what they get, they should show effort for reward but not everyone are blessed with "our" effort or motivation, yes a government can just throw them in the garbage heap and say "tough sh*t" but as DaMulta said, it just costs you more down the line, plus of course, a lot of those people still vote!

    No government in the civilised world is going to go down that route I mentioned earlier, you know, if someone falls pregnant they either get rid or work but not spend a life on social security, probably for 2 main reasons (and this re-visits the contraception thing as well), first, like it or not, it would be socially irresponsible (but I agree thats down to ones personal perception) and secondly, in the USA for example,whichever government/party took even a small step in that direction, would never get in power again.....why? probably because you have quite a large population of catholics that largely are against both abortion and contraception.
     
    DaMulta says thanks.
  18. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    Ah, ol' Barry with his "tax and spend" philosophy instead of a "fiscal conservative" like McCain, eh? :roll:

    [​IMG]

    You Obama-haters are a hoot, seriously. :laugh:
     

    Attached Files:

  19. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,674 (5.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,506
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
  20. WhiteLotus

    WhiteLotus

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2007
    Messages:
    6,546 (2.50/day)
    Thanks Received:
    855
    Neither a surplus or a deficit is a good thing. Surplus however is good to get out of recession, deficit usually puts you in one iirc
     
  21. Bigjohn

    Bigjohn

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    400 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Location:
    Woodstock, GA USA
    Why on earth should I put someone besides my FAMILY above my own needs? Why should the goverment force me to? I gave 10% of my income in charity last year, on top of taking care of my family... 3 kids, a beautiful wife, and a golden retriever.
    People are what they make of themselves. Period. Excepting of course those born with some disability, or whom by some horrible accident find themselves disabled. Those are the only people who should ever qualify 'government assistance', and only when they can't get it from family and private charity. And, of course, this excludes people who's stupid life choices cause their disability - i.e. drive a motorcycle weaving in and out of traffic without a helmet... you splat yourself, well, you pay until such time as you run out of insurance, money, whatever, and then pull the damn plug - unless some private charity wants to keep you on life support.

    yeah, but your right to life stops dead when it interferes with my right to liberty and property.
    who's changing the subject? Obama is BAD for this country, and is so in more ways than I could ever list... including socialized health care. So, you prefer the fiction of "government money" to any fiction that elevates the individual and initiative and liberty? Ok.
    No... because I could not do so without taking from someone what they earned.
    Do you believe in slavery? If not, then how can you say that we automatically owe 30+ percent of our lives to feed the maw of the government entitlement system??
     
  22. Bigjohn

    Bigjohn

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2008
    Messages:
    400 (0.18/day)
    Thanks Received:
    99
    Location:
    Woodstock, GA USA
    No less biased than the obama lover link he posted originally...
     
  23. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,674 (5.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,506
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    And I can go 1 mile and get it for free.....fook capitalism, give me common sense every time! :rockout:
     
  24. Tatty_One

    Tatty_One Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2006
    Messages:
    16,674 (5.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,506
    Location:
    Worcestershire, UK
    Lol yes but you were criticising him for it!
     
  25. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    What are you talking about? Americans can get the same healthcare without costs up front, usually within a mile or two, as well...

    They just have to 1) wait until they're almost dead 2) go to an emergency room at a hospital, and then 3) accept tens of thousands of dollars worth of debt that they'll be paying off their entire lives. :shadedshu
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page