1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Will you wait for NVIDIA's next-generation Kepler GPU?

Discussion in 'TPU Frontpage Polls' started by W1zzard, Jan 29, 2012.

?

Will you wait for NVIDIA's next-generation Kepler GPU?

Poll closed Feb 20, 2012.
  1. Yes

    2,512 vote(s)
    38.5%
  2. No

    1,494 vote(s)
    22.9%
  3. My GPU is strong enough to let me skip this new generation

    2,512 vote(s)
    38.5%
  1. EarthDog

    EarthDog

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,176 (1.86/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Im curious... why have a poll in the thread when it only redirects you to the front page in the first place? Bleh.
  2. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy
    I think that's because the Main Page poll will redirect your here to discuss
  3. Kantastic

    Kantastic

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    5,154 (2.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    993
    I think the better question is: am I dumb?
  4. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,606 (5.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,243
    Probably not - as you are clever enough to be a member of one of the most badass sites on the interwebs called TPU
  5. radusorin

    radusorin

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2012
    Messages:
    67 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    8
    Location:
    Romania
    lol nice replay :laugh: :toast:
  6. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    The difference is that R500 was a high-end GPU when it was included in the XB360. If the rumors are true the Xbox Next will have a 3+ year old mid-range GPU by the time it launches. That's quite a difference and we'll have to suffer the stagnation at that crappy level for another 10 years, yay!! Improvement? NO. I mean for 1 year after release we'll be better than right now, but in 2 years and for the next 8 years we will be much much worse.

    Direct hardware access providing massive improvements is a falacy anyway. Consoles do "well" because they play the games at 1/4 the resolution that PC gamers use, with no AA or AF in most titles and 10 bit HDR (instead of 24/32 bit) and the list goes on and on and on. Direct HW access helps something but does not make it 4x faster, not even 2x. Take a 8800 GT/HD4800, use 720p 0/2 xAA, 2x AF, enable every conceivable optimization in the CP (AF, trilinear, LOD bias, etc, etc) and you'll end up with very similar performance and looks as the consoles.
  7. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy
    I didn't say it's going to make it like high end hardware, I said it's gonna help, why do you have to read something I didn't write in the first moment? Please read better before arguing.
    It's blatantly obvious that you can't turn a 6670 into a 6970 with hardware optimization.
  8. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    I read what you said perfectly, and I read your next posts too. I'm not arguing with what you said about HW optimizations, I'm arguing against your claim that HD6670 is somehow better than current consoles are. It will, maybe for one year and after that we will be much much worse. And really HD6670 is not even so much faster than what current consoles have. It's maybe 2x better only and that advantage will be gone if the new console does real 1080p in most games.

    In fact I'm starting to believe that HD6670 is complte BS, or were there not rumors about M$ doing 2 consoles, one similar to the Wii and one for enthusiasts? HD6670 for a WiiBox480 or whatever does makes sense.

    And from another perspective, I may also conceed that maybe, only maybe, HD6670 level of graphics on consoles could be a good idea and good for us, IF developers decide to screw the consoles and focus on PCs (at least for graphics), didn't EA said something like that and so did Carmack. Now I'm dreaming... :laugh:
  9. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,606 (5.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,243
    Look bro - you can optimise the fuck out of anything and everything but theres a point where you can push as hard as you want and the hardware wont budge - and thats the limit im talking about - its great for consoles but it wont be great for PCs because devs make games for consoles first before porting them to the PC.

    I dont need to READ your post again. you just need to understand mine a bit more (no offense I know english isnt your first language and all)
  10. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,936 (7.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,509
    I didn't wait.....just bought a 570! WHOOT
  11. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,606 (5.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,243
    the 570 is still an awesome card - stand proud bro - I even considered downgrading to 570s in SLi too at one point but I got annoyed with BF3 so i didnt bother
  12. ViperXTR

    ViperXTR

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,394 (1.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    407
  13. TheMailMan78

    TheMailMan78 Big Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2007
    Messages:
    20,936 (7.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7,509
    You mean upgrade. 570's do better in BF3.
  14. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy

    I understand what are your feeling about this guys, and share them with you, because I'm a PC gamer too.

    The 6670 is a step forward of what current consoles have, that's what I meant to say but OF COURSE it isn't the leap forward we expected them to make, because let's say it, who doesn't want (especially amongst PC gamers) to completely piss on DX9 and jump with a jetpack on DX11?
    It should have already happened by a long time, we are stuck at the level of consoles and that's not going to change, the reason being money.
  15. FreedomEclipse

    FreedomEclipse ~Technological Technocrat~

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    13,606 (5.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,243
    yeah

    570s totally arse rape in BF3 compared to the 6970s with the issue they have when AA is turned on. I would have like it anyway as i dont really game at a huge rez (1920x1080)
  16. the54thvoid

    the54thvoid

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    3,260 (1.89/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,484
    Location:
    Glasgow - home of formal profanity
  17. ViperXTR

    ViperXTR

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    1,394 (1.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    407
    Yeah, and in the table it lists the shader clocks, and ive read somewhere that there will be no more dedicated clocks for it (or will be hidden)
  18. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    I love my 580. Not going anywhere for a while. Maybe grab a second down the line used or something. I don't miss the AMD drivers at all.

    I'll consider AMD again when they get their driver team up to snuff.
  19. SK-1

    SK-1

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    3,200 (0.94/day)
    Thanks Received:
    330
    My 2 5870's still do the trick....but those 7900 cards look nice. I go back and forth on the upgrade decision...In all reality, I needs me a good job before new cards.
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2014
  20. radrok

    radrok

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    2,981 (2.87/day)
    Thanks Received:
    800
    Location:
    Italy
    Everything is fine until you start using CFX, then the problem begins :|
  21. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,615 (0.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    168
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    Ordered a 7950 last night. The OCing will begin, soon. Muhahahhahah

    No clue when high perf kepler will be out and it may not be until summer. Nvidia hasn't been behaving very favorable, to me, so they're kinda out anyway.

    Last GTX was a no go b/c of the power consumption (at 1st) and not that great of perf if you ask me (until the 580), but then the 580 was retarded expensive. I bought my 1st 6950 for 275 bucks and unlocked it.

    I've used a riva TNT2, had a Geforce 3 Ultra (maybe my fav card ever besides the Ti4600), used the Ti4600 extensively, skipped to a 6800GT, then 7900GT, SLI 8800GTs (very impressive cards), xfire 4890s (excellent, too), xfire 6970s (yes, definitely some xfire issues), and now a 7950.

    S3 had some nice tech way back in the day, but it was wasted on terrible drivers. It was hard to play games without random crashing and freezing.
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2012
  22. 1c3d0g

    1c3d0g

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    688 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Uhm...duh!!! :cool:
  23. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    Considering my last card by them was a 4870X2, I was screwed from the get go. lol.
  24. TheGuruStud

    TheGuruStud

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    1,615 (0.64/day)
    Thanks Received:
    168
    Location:
    Police/Nanny State of America
    *shrugs* I had zero issues with xfire on my 4890s unless it was a game problem (meaning it also was crap on SLI and had perf issues all around).
  25. jamsbong New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Messages:
    83 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    7
    The article from semi accurate is quite insightful eventhough I find Charlie's way of writing can be lengthily annoying.

    http://semiaccurate.com/2012/02/01/physics-hardware-makes-keplergk104-fast/

    The article says Kepler is like ATI. small die size, high Mhz, lots of stream processors (sp) and no more hot clock (no more 2x clock speed for the sp). So Nvidia is doing an AMD!
    Also, why add more phyx specialised hardware?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page