1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Windows Vienna In No less Than 3 Years ?

Discussion in 'News' started by HellasVagabond, Jul 21, 2007.

  1. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    At Microsoft’s Global Exchange annual sales conference in Orlando this week, Microsoft stated that it is anticipating it will take at least three years from now to get the next version of Windows client out the door. Microsoft officials told MGX attendees that the company is currently internally planning Windows Seven. So far, the company has determined Windows Seven will come in both 32 and 64-bit flavors. No word on how many SKUs or any kind of guidance on features was provided, but Microsoft did say it would address both consumer and business segments with Windows Seven. Microsoft is mulling the concept of how to extend Windows Seven with subscription-based services, according to the deck — more like Microsoft Desktop Optimization Pack (MDOP), which Microsoft currently offers to its Software Assurance customers, than Windows Live, however.

    Microsoft’s statement:
    Source: Zdnet
     
  2. crow1001

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    366 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Hmmmm, i wonder if Vista will still be a performance hog and still as stable as Paris hilton when the new OS arrives...:rolleyes:
     
  3. Nemesis881 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Messages:
    692 (0.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    32
    Location:
    Dawsonville, GA
    Lawl.

    Why a new OS so quickly? Just make Vista better you morons..
     
  4. Benpi New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2006
    Messages:
    415 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    New OS every 4 years sounds right to me. I don't like the idea of subscription services tho.
     
  5. lemonadesoda

    lemonadesoda

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    6,266 (2.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    968
    Vista.11 or Vista SE (Second Edition)! Where is it?
     
  6. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    New OS every 3-4 years is ok....Microsoft has been following that road ever since Windows 95 and has yet to fail them.
     
  7. Conti027

    Conti027

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,388 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    95
    Location:
    Edmonds, Washington
    no rush for me. and ive hear of this befor
     
  8. WarEagleAU

    WarEagleAU Bird of Prey

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2006
    Messages:
    10,804 (3.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    547
    Location:
    Gurley, AL
    They screwed up and now they want a new product to make the old one go away. :nods:
     
  9. jocksteeluk

    jocksteeluk New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,457 (0.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    46
    Location:
    The 13th room on the 13th floor of the 13th buildi
    by the next version windows id think it would be time to move to 64bit, 32bit os's should be put to bed by then with legacy support being Vista 32bit.
     
  10. Conti027

    Conti027

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2007
    Messages:
    1,388 (0.49/day)
    Thanks Received:
    95
    Location:
    Edmonds, Washington
    whats so bad about 32 bit?
     
  11. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    8,431 (2.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,253
    4Gb of address space for one.
    Two cards with 1Gg each of memory, any memory on the sound card, all your PCI-Express addresses, PCI, Onboard.


    And you end up with 1Gb of room left for physical system memory.


    No thanks. 64 for me on my next build.
     
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  12. russianboy New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2005
    Messages:
    1,800 (0.55/day)
    Thanks Received:
    90
    Stupid Stupid Microsoft And Their Stupid X86-32 !
     
  13. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    Not to mention, if there isn't a push for x64 in the market, developers are never gonna write for it.
     
  14. HellasVagabond New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,404 (1.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    162
    Location:
    Athens , GREECE
    No 32-bit cpu will be able to run windows vienna ( seven ).....
    But it could boost sales for people that will have old machines and dream they can run Microsoft's newest OS :)
     
  15. Dippyskoodlez

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,095 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    238
    Location:
    Kansas City, KS

    Congratulations microsoft, you just screwed yourself out of the 64 bit transition again.

    yeah, all 3 of those users?


    Microsoft needs to cut the 32 bit lifeline right now, or they are never going to fill out a 64 bit transition with decent hardware support.

    They've finally reached a point where 32 bit computers wont ever be upgraded to vista, so why bother. XP does its job, and does it well.
     
  16. Demon_82

    Demon_82

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    Messages:
    100 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Sorry, but x86 (32bits) is originary from Intel, about 27 years ago. Microsoft just has to adapt to it as well as to the AMD64 instruction sets.
     
  17. Wile E

    Wile E Power User

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2006
    Messages:
    24,324 (8.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,778
    I think he was just referring to MS's stubborn refusal to quit making 32bit OSes. I don't think he was reffering to the actual architecture of cpus.
     
  18. Demon_82

    Demon_82

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    Messages:
    100 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Actually, he doesn't let it clear, it sounded to me the way I answered. Anyways, if it's as you say, people still with IA-32 CPUs will scream for being left out before they scrap their old computers... I think Microsoft can't cut IA-32 support that so fast, but I'm sure this is the last OS wich will have IA-32 support.
     
  19. Dippyskoodlez

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,095 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    238
    Location:
    Kansas City, KS
    The ratio of 64 bit computers running windows Vista to the number that never will or are INCAPABLE of running windows vista I would be willing to bet is quite heavy on the 64 bit side.

    Theres little reason Microsoft shouldn't have kept Vista 64 bit only.

    They scrapped so much of NT with it, why rebuild it twice? They beefed up hardware requirements, enticing people to upgrade hardware. dual OS's also gives great increases in support costs for both Microsoft and hardware manufacturers.

    Simply keeping XP 32 bit and offering a 64bit Vista would have had a little fidgeting from the 32 bit user base at first, but would have given Microsoft a much cleaner upgrade execution, and an actual incentive to upgrade to windows vista.
     
  20. Blacklash New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2007
    Messages:
    186 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    36
    Exactly, if they continue to offer the option for 32bit we are never going to see a real shift to 64bit.
    When is going to be right time to force the move? It's getting old. Why do people that use x64 sound upset? Folks that want to use x64 are stuck with 32bit if they want reliable support and quality drivers. You end up with crap support and crap drivers for x64.

    I use XP SP-2 and Vista x64. Right now there is no comparison in gaming. XP-SP-2 is not only faster it's smoother and more reliable. That could change if MS had the balls to say, "We're moving to x64 folks. It's time." Instead they say, "Oh well, there's no consumer demand.", and there never will be the way they are handling it.

    As another said Vista would have been a much better product if it had been purely x64, particularly where security is concerned.

    The move certainly doesn't need to be over night and they should have started a push towards it back when Win XP Professional x64 was released.
     
  21. Demon_82

    Demon_82

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2006
    Messages:
    100 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Don't forget that Microsoft, (as Intel, AMD, nVidia, Sun...) is a private company which has the benefits as their main objetive. If they can make more money from having both versions, they'll do it that way. It's simple as that, a market study.
     
  22. Dippyskoodlez

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    5,095 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    238
    Location:
    Kansas City, KS
    Vista would probably fly off the shelves if it was pure 64 bit. :toast:
     
  23. Ben Clarke

    Ben Clarke

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    4,403 (1.45/day)
    Thanks Received:
    152
    Location:
    England
    Apparantly, Vienna is supposed to be the last system they ever do that is native 32-bit. Or was it Vista? Who cares, one of the two.
     
  24. Mad-Matt

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    180 (0.05/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2
    Location:
    UK, Lincoln
    I think they really start from scratch this time and have performance as a goal instead of something the hardware makers can look after.

    make the devs build and optimise it on a 1ghz 64bit system so that the world can benefit from a new os that might actually boost productivity ;)
     
  25. RickyG512 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2005
    Messages:
    477 (0.14/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Location:
    Croydon, England
    wats the advantages of 64 bit anyway ???
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page