1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

x1800xtpe 512 mb more powerful than 7900 gtx in f.e.a.r proof inside

Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by x1800xtpeown, Oct 23, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. x1800xtpeown New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    98 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    my graphical settings in f.e.a.r below and benchmark, everything on max except soft shadows. im running 1792x1344 which is higher resolution than 1920x1200 more pixels, multiply the numbers 1792x1344=higher resolution than 1920x1200 and i still score higher lol than a 7900 gtx seen here.

    http://www.rage3d.com/reviews/video/nvidia7950gt/index.php?p=4

    7900 gtx @ 1920x1200 x4 aa x16 af =35 fps

    x1800xtpe @ 1792x1344 x4 aa x16 af =36 fps higher resolution and score owned lol.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
    Last edited: Oct 23, 2006
  2. Azn Tr14dZ New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,299 (1.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    It's only by a few FPS kid, and why don't you run at 1920x1200? Even if you get 1 FPS higher, it's not "owned". They're both good cards, and they're close together. No need to talk shit to others about how much better your card is, even though it's only 1 more FPS.

    No one cares about (you) and how much better your X1800XT is (even though it's not much better). And why don't you bench other games than F.E.A.R.? I'm sure in OpenGL games like Doom 3 and Quake IV your X1800XT would get "owned"! No need to talk shit about other people's cards!
  3. x1800xtpeown New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    98 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    funny, 7900 GTX does more shader operations and and texture fill rate but lacks pixel fill rate to compare to x1800xtpe i guess that's why my x1800xtpe beating it in higher resolution, 7900 gtx @ 700,1800 would definitly beat my x1800xtpe though.
  4. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,117 (5.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    I care that you stretched the damn screen............
  5. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,117 (5.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    7900 gtx @ 1920x1200 x4 aa x16 af =35 fps

    x1800xtpe @ 1792x1344 x4 aa x16 af =36 fps higher resolution and score owned lol.

    Hmmm the GTX is running a higher resolution.....BUT like AZN said its only by ONE FRAME, now if your were pointing out quality differences....
  6. x1800xtpeown New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    98 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    dude you dont understand, 1792x1344 is way higher resolution than 1920x1200 and i still score 1 fps higher running more pixels on screen at higher resolution that's pretty much ownage, if it was 1920x1200 i would be scoring even higher fps because it's lower res.

    1792x1344=2,408448 pixels

    1920x1200=2,304000

    and my x1800xtpe still scored higher fps running more pixels.

    my moniter doesnt support 1920x1200, but it supports higher resolution and i beat 7900 gtx, so proves my x1800xtpe more powerful in f.e.a.r.
  7. JC316

    JC316 Knows what makes you tick

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    9,362 (3.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    903
    Holy batshit batman!! A whopping 1 fucking FPS. OMFGWTFBBQ dood tahts just total pownage. Anyway, turn soft shadows on and see what happens.

    I am sorry, but you are going to great lenghts just to prove that an X1800 is better by an asshair than the 7900.
  8. x1800xtpeown New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    98 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    no 1792x1344=higher resolution than 1920x1200 dumbass lol

    use calculator. add 1792 x 1344 then 1920 x 1200 , 1792x1344=more pixels, i ran higher resolution and still beat a 7900 gtx running lower resolution , owned STFU>
  9. x1800xtpeown New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    98 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    1792x1344=2,408448 pixels

    1920x1200=2,304000


    still beat 7900 GTX, by 1 fps running higher resolution asshole lol
  10. JC316

    JC316 Knows what makes you tick

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    9,362 (3.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    903
    *Pulls out crystal ball* Seeing a possible banning in the future if this keeps up.
  11. Azn Tr14dZ New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,299 (1.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    It's not way higher, it's only by 100,000 pixels. You care way to much about proving your claims. Real people wouldn't get video cards for bragging, mostly for playing.

    Don't you notice you're the only one who's trying to say that your card is better than others?

    And also, compare other games than F.E.A.R. why don't you? Whenever I see you, it's always F.E.A.R. that you want to bench! What are you trying to hide? Is a 7900GTX better at other games?
  12. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,117 (5.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    I say your wrong look whats lower on monitor settings........

    Attached Files:

  13. JC316

    JC316 Knows what makes you tick

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    9,362 (3.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    903
    My monitor says the same. 1792x1344 is lower than 1900x1200
  14. Azn Tr14dZ New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,299 (1.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    That's true, 1920x1200 is WideScreen!
  15. x1800xtpeown New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    98 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    if i ran 1920x1200 my framerate would be even higher beating the 7900 gtx, dont you people know how to compare pixels? 1792x1344=alot more pixels higher resolution more stressful than 1920x1200 and i still score higher lmfao!
  16. LiNKiN

    LiNKiN Staff

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    1,757 (0.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    298
    Someone quick,!! Please give him a cookie so he will caya se boca :shadedshu
  17. x1800xtpeown New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    98 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    1920x1200 is widescreen still not a higher resolution dude lol.

    start>all programs>accessories>calculator put 1792 x 1344 = then add 1920 x 1200, the 1792x1344=higher amount of pixels.
  18. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,117 (5.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    My bad, but look 1920x1200 is even higher on the list.....I know where the Fing Calculator is....

    Attached Files:

    • lol3.JPG
      lol3.JPG
      File size:
      54.4 KB
      Views:
      120
  19. x1800xtpeown New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    98 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    1792x1344=4:31 aspect ratio, 1920x1200=widescreen 16:9, just because 1920x1200 is last on list, doesnt make it highest resolution, dont you know how to multiply the numbers? to find the amount of pixels? 1792x1344 looks better than 1920x1200 ask anyone only a dumbass wouldnt admit 1792x1344 has more pixels higher resolution.
  20. Azn Tr14dZ New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,299 (1.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    This kid is really pissing me off! He's trying to prove that his X1800XT is better to some kids he doesn't know online! You need to get a life kid besides telling other people how much "better" your X1800 is!
  21. JC316

    JC316 Knows what makes you tick

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2006
    Messages:
    9,362 (3.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    903
    Here is my X1800XT stock speeds using the same specs you were. The difference isn't all that great. 4-5 fps and you may have something better in you computer like 2gb of ram that could be making the diference

    Attached Files:

  22. DaMulta

    DaMulta My stars went supernova

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2006
    Messages:
    16,117 (5.52/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,454
    Location:
    Oklahoma T-Town
    1920 is a higher resoution.......... EVERYTHING SEEMS SMALLER.....
  23. Azn Tr14dZ New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,299 (1.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    And if you know how to calculate, 1920x1200 is 16:10! Not 16:9!
  24. x1800xtpeown New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2006
    Messages:
    98 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    gonna post some half life 2 lost coast benchmarks 1600x1200 x4 aa x16 af, i whip a 7900 gtx's ass.
  25. Azn Tr14dZ New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2006
    Messages:
    5,299 (1.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    You still don't get it do you? No one cares at all! Period!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page