1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Xbox One Chip Slower Than PlayStation 4

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, May 24, 2013.

  1. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,421 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,112
    About prices: If the prices out now are more or less correct they will be somewhat close. In some places it's up to a €165 difference, but in most places they are identical, about €770. Doesn't really say anything but still.
  2. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,342 (6.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,361
    Location:
    IA, USA
    I think PS4 and XB1 will have about the same price. The savings on the weaker hardware in XB1 is going towards Kinect.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  3. Mindweaver

    Mindweaver Moderato®™ Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    5,146 (2.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,652
    Location:
    Statesville, NC
    I agree. :toast:

    @everybody: I don't think it will matter to the masses that it's slower, because the PS3 is faster than the XBox 360 correct? and nobody cared. Of course the dev's had a very rough time harnessing the power of the PS3, because it was so crappy to code. I think it will come down to content. :toast:
    Crunching for Team TPU
  4. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,392 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,225
    i'm not sure what all the arguing is about. when it comes to consoles, the difference in hardware specs should not be considered until AFTER examining the codebase. a console could have the most powerful proc/gpu combo but if its codebase is crap then games are going to run like crap. why do you think a company Naughty Dog can churn out amazing looking games for the PS3 or why Polyphony can add such amazing detail to their cars in GT5? It is because the codebase for the PS3, while more complicated, is far superior to the xbox 360. Of course, the downside is you get a fewer number of optimized games. anyway...
    Mindweaver says thanks.
  5. NeoXF

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    Messages:
    615 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    80
    PS3 games also didn't start looking "impressive" untill late 2009... An almost 3 year lag (that's a pretty steep learning curve, even more so for first party developers)... coincidence? I think not.
  6. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    5,988 (6.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,941
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    Yup, and the 360 having a IBM POWER chip in it with Altivec handy, a lot more developers knew how to work with that as opposed to the PS3. I think this will be less of an issue since both the Xbox One and PS4 will be on x86. I suspect that MS might pull ahead since they already have devoted a lot of time and development into writing stuff for x86(_64) in the past, a lot more so than Sony.

    Consider the Windows kernel for example, it is a very mature piece of software and I suspect that MS has learned a lot of things after making mistakes in the past.
  7. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,392 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,225
    i don't know about that. between Sony and Microsoft I would argue that Sony will deliver the better codebase to develop games on.
  8. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,342 (6.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,361
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Are you forgetting DirectX, XNA, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio? Microsoft is the undisputed champion of codebases.
    Aquinus says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  9. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,392 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,225
    Yes, but it's not like those programmers don't also work for Sony.
  10. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,342 (6.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,361
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Unless Sony sniped them, they don't. Also considering that most PlayStation development isn't done by SCEA, I highly doubt they sniped many/any employees from Microsoft.
    Aquinus says thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  11. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    5,988 (6.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,941
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    We programmers have lives too. We don't eat code, defecate programs, and sleep in the interim like a computer does. :roll:

    In all seriousness, I think Ford is right. MS developed tools for making it easier to efficiently implement things and I think that will work in MS's favor. Not to say that Sony is incompetent, it's just that this is kind of MS's domain and they've been doing it for a long time. They haven't got to where they are now by writing mediocre software, despite what everyone things. Even if Sony has the developers, MS already has the technology.
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
  12. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,392 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,225
    Big deal if Microsoft has been doing it a long time. Sony has been developing consoles longer than MS. The original PS was a marvel of technology. The PS2 was an incredible leap and much better than the XBOX. My bet is that Sony delivers the better codebase because they have a longer history with this stuff.
  13. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,342 (6.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,361
    Location:
    IA, USA
    Not really. Only thing revolutionary about the PS was CD, PS2 was DVD, and PS3 was BluRay (and Cell, but in a bad way). Now that discs are diminishing in importance, Microsoft has a real opportunity to do a huge number on Sony.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  14. m1dg3t

    m1dg3t

    Joined:
    May 22, 2010
    Messages:
    2,246 (1.47/day)
    Thanks Received:
    513
    Location:
    Canada
    Sega had CD as did Panasonic 3D0, which were both out before PS IIRC

    Anyone recall what NeoGeo was? Cartridge or disc?
  15. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,392 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,225
    They could but they won't. This is Microsoft we are talking about after all. Look at the backlash they already have thanks to poor management decisions over Windows 8 and the latest XBOX. Technology has never been Microsoft's problem, it is always been poor strategy. Sony will win again.
  16. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    39,530 (13.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,926
    Big beautiful cartridges! I loved it when software was.. hardware. :D
  17. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,421 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,112
    That Windows 8 bit is murky at best and the Xbox One (if that is what you are refering to) is not out so it's hard to say anything about "backlashes".

    Not to mention that XB1 shares some stuff with Windows, it'll be easier to port and all that. I think MS will draw the longest straw here.
  18. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,392 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,225
    in what? game quality or sales?
  19. Frick

    Frick Fishfaced Nincompoop

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Messages:
    10,421 (3.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,112
    Game quality is irrelevant, all games suck anyway. Sales, and general useability, if that is a word.
  20. Easy Rhino

    Easy Rhino Linux Advocate

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2006
    Messages:
    13,392 (4.76/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,225
    damn, that is just negative. i wouldn't say all games suck. i would say though that 90% of titles delivered by the big distro/devel houses suck. most of the indie games i have played have been fun but get boring after an hour or so. all in all i think games are in a pretty big slump. i do hope things like Kinect and Move change the game a bit. pun intended.
  21. CrAsHnBuRnXp

    CrAsHnBuRnXp

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    5,455 (2.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    635
    I wont play a game if i have to get up and dance around. :laugh:
    FordGT90Concept says thanks.
  22. FordGT90Concept

    FordGT90Concept "I go fast!1!11!1!"

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Messages:
    13,342 (6.31/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3,361
    Location:
    IA, USA
    It's like 3D. Entertaining for 15 minutes and never used again. So...worse than indie games but a helluvalot more expensive. :p
    Easy Rhino and Aquinus say thanks.
    Crunching for Team TPU
  23. theoneandonlymrk

    theoneandonlymrk

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    3,352 (2.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    550
    Location:
    Manchester uk
    I can't even be bothered holding my arms up to drive , what next a pad so you don't have to exercise:D
  24. Aquinus

    Aquinus Resident Wat-man

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2012
    Messages:
    5,988 (6.56/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,941
    Location:
    Concord, NH
    +1: I bought a Kinect and I personally haven't used it more than 2 or 3 hours total, but I will use it for main menu navigation if I feel like it and its nice when it will log you into your gamer tag based on your face.

    With that said though, 30 minutes of Kinect is a good daily exercise because it really does make you move around a lot in some games.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page