1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

XFX Abandons GeForce GTX 400 Series

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 30, 2010.

  1. btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    28,553 (11.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13,644
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    XFX is getting cozier with AMD by the day, which is an eyesore for NVIDIA. Amidst the launch of GeForce GTX 400 series, XFX did what could have been unimaginable a few months ago: abandon NVIDIA's high-end GPU launch. That's right, XFX has decided against making and selling GeForce GTX 480 and GeForce GTX 470 graphics cards, saying that it favours high-end GPUs from AMD, instead. This comes even as XFX seemed to have been ready with its own product art. Apart from making new non-reference design SKUs for pretty-much every Radeon HD 5000 series GPU, the company is working on even more premium graphics cards targeted at NVIDIA's high-end GPUs.

    The rift between XFX and NVIDIA became quite apparent when XFX outright bashed NVIDIA's high-end lineup in a recent press communication about a new high-end Radeon-based graphics card it's designing. "XFX have always developed the most powerful, versatile Gaming weapons in the world - and have just stepped up to the gaming plate and launched something spectacular that may well literally blow the current NVIDIA offerings clean away," adding "GTX480 and GTX470 are upon us, but perhaps the time has come to Ferm up who really has the big Guns." The move may come to the disappointment of some potential buyers of GTX 400 series, as XFX's popular Double Lifetime Warranty scheme would be missed. XFX however, maintains that it may choose to work on lower-end Fermi-derivatives.

    [​IMG]

    Source: HardwareCanucks
     
  2. Paintface

    Paintface New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2008
    Messages:
    389 (0.17/day)
    Thanks Received:
    73
    I guess XFX wants to stick with producing videocards instead of fancy looking roomheaters
     
  3. aCid888*

    aCid888* New Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2008
    Messages:
    2,754 (1.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    645
    Location:
    In a state of flux...
  4. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,182 (5.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    How many will follow suit?
     
  5. afw

    afw New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    642 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    127
  6. DigitalUK

    DigitalUK New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    503 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Location:
    UK South
    maybe XFX knows something we dont or maybe not, bfg and evga has no problems bringing the heat..:D
     
  7. gumpty

    gumpty

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Messages:
    744 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    134
    Location:
    Auckland
    :eek:

    Wouldn't it be interesting to know the actual reasons behind this. Is it a calculated business move which ties in with their strategic business plan? Or is it something subtler, like seeing flaws in the Fermi chip itself (maybe heat?), and didn't want to get involved with a chip that was likely (pure speculation) to cause them lots of RMA trouble in the future?

    :confused:
     
    shevanel, mdm-adph and lemonadesoda say thanks.
  8. TheOnlyHero

    TheOnlyHero

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2010
    Messages:
    38 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    Location:
    Sliven,Bulgaria
    I dont care about XFX, its there choice. There a lot of companys like xfx ( Asus,Inno3d,Galaxy...) ho makes Nvidia videocards , so it isnt a big shock for me .XFX goes against mother nature :)
     
    1c3d0g says thanks.
  9. Fourstaff

    Fourstaff Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    9,182 (5.22/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,971
    Location:
    Home
    Yeah, I think the warranty is going to be a problem for them, since that they offer generous warranty services.
     
  10. gumpty

    gumpty

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Messages:
    744 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    134
    Location:
    Auckland
    I think the 'shocking' thing about this is that ... iirc ... XFX were an Nvidia-only company as little as 12 months ago. To wholly switch teams so quickly, within one new generation of GPUs, is the surprising part. For me at least.
     
    Scrizz, shevanel and Kei say thanks.
  11. DigitalUK

    DigitalUK New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    503 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Location:
    UK South
    warranty is everything ,specially when you are paying that sort of money on a card. 1 year later you could have a dead card with nothing you can do about it.

    a card that can run at 100c wont be lasting years. if most of use saw those temps we would be crying/rebuilding or rma'ing
     
  12. Velvet Wafer

    Velvet Wafer New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Messages:
    5,123 (2.66/day)
    Thanks Received:
    990
    Location:
    North of Germany
    someone with big influence at XFX knews something, Nvidia doesnt want regular customers to know, i believe;)
    anyway, Evga is Nvidia exclusive till today, and that really pisses me off:laugh:
     
  13. qwerty_lesh

    qwerty_lesh

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2007
    Messages:
    534 (0.20/day)
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    yeah, thats extremely common for consumer buying trends (to follow a brand thats doing the best value/performance at the current times) but not for manufacturers or manufacturing partners. :twitch:
     
  14. gumpty

    gumpty

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Messages:
    744 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    134
    Location:
    Auckland
    Yeah, which would be worse PR for Nvidia's Fermi brand: XFX not making the cards at all, or XFX only offering, say a 1 or 2 year warranty - when they offer a lifetime warranty on everything else? It would make everyone wonder about the safety of buying such a GPU.

    Bearing that in mind, I wonder if Nvidia politely asked XFX to not make any at all when they told them they would only do a limited warranty - knowing that pulling out totally, and just keeping mum about the reasons, would be the better choice for Fermi's reputation.

    This is all wild speculation though.
     
    shevanel says thanks.
  15. Live OR Die

    Live OR Die

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    3,914 (1.46/day)
    Thanks Received:
    386
    they end up shiping both in time so who cares
     
  16. Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,310 (1.06/day)
    Thanks Received:
    481
    That's a sort of a: :nutkick:, but the colors on the smileys need to be reversed...
     
  17. ArkanHell New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2006
    Messages:
    96 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Location:
    Paraguay
    XFX is just afraid of the low sales that could have if they take out the 480, and you know why.
     
  18. Hayder_Master

    Hayder_Master

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2008
    Messages:
    5,176 (2.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    638
    Location:
    IRAQ-Baghdad
    i think nvidia who is losing XFX, maybe people now know the best brand is EVGA it's right but nvidia known as durable and powerful cards cuz the XFX


    and i think it's nvidia new GPU's problem, high heat mean GPU take more and that's point to new nvidia GPU's have bad quality
     
  19. DigitalUK

    DigitalUK New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2009
    Messages:
    503 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Location:
    UK South
    XFX has always released Nvidia cards in all flavours , there has to be a very good reason to drop NV now like a bad smell.
    at the end of the day we need Nvidia to come through tho or we will be paying through the nose for cards, ive noticed over last few days since the release that the ati 58xx cards seem to be going up in price and not down.
     
  20. gumpty

    gumpty

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Messages:
    744 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    134
    Location:
    Auckland
    QFT
     
  21. OnBoard

    OnBoard New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2006
    Messages:
    3,044 (1.04/day)
    Thanks Received:
    379
    Location:
    Finland
  22. crow1001

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    366 (0.13/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Guess them 5000 cards XFX are selling are doing really well for them, they have basically gave the finger to Nvidia which looks really bad for them, ATI fanbois are gonna love this.
     
    segalaw19800 and shevanel say thanks.
  23. gumpty

    gumpty

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2008
    Messages:
    744 (0.32/day)
    Thanks Received:
    134
    Location:
    Auckland
    This could also be a likely reason why XFX pulled out. They couldn't get Nvidia to guarantee they'd be supplied with enough chips to make the whole manufacturing/branding/marketing thing worthwhile; so they just said feck-it, don't bother.
     
  24. HalfAHertz

    HalfAHertz

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    1,890 (0.96/day)
    Thanks Received:
    379
    Location:
    Singapore
    Sounds like the most logical reason
     
    phanbuey says thanks.
  25. Semi-Lobster

    Semi-Lobster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2009
    Messages:
    353 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    29
    Fudzilla is saying that it was Nvidia who's breaking up with XFX and not the other way around

    http://www.fudzilla.com/content/view/18278/1/

    This is sort of the exact opposite of what every other site is saying and they seem to be the only ones claiming this :rolleyes:
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page