1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ZOTAC GeForce GTX 460 1024 MB

Discussion in 'Reviews' started by W1zzard, Jul 7, 2010.

  1. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,788 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,490
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2010
    Soylent Joe, trt740 and CounterZeus say thanks.
  2. kid41212003

    kid41212003

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2008
    Messages:
    3,584 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    533
    Location:
    California
    It's as good as the GTX465 (faster in some caces) with lower CUDA cores. Interested.
  3. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (3.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    It's more efficient than the GF100 according to anand as well, interesting.
  4. CounterZeus

    CounterZeus

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2009
    Messages:
    208 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    37
    Location:
    Belgium
    looks like nvidia got a winner here. ty for the review!
  5. HillBeast

    HillBeast New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2010
    Messages:
    407 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Well looking at the other 460s, this is definately the worst. I'd rather have the Gigabyte or MSI or something. The rubbish fan and pretty poop temperatures (compared to the other 460s) makes this a definate no go for me. I was thinking maybe the blower fan would give the best cooling but obviously not. I guess blower fans just aren't as good as we would be lead to think. Maybe this is why the Vapor-X uses a normal fan.
  6. Imsochobo New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    514 (0.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    35
    Location:
    I live in Norway, in the province Buskerud.
    Well, the problem is still.
    Ineffecient compared to ATI.

    But look at those idle numbers!

    A leap in the right direction nvidia! but unfortunately its not able to really match ati yet....

    But yay for the OC potential!
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2010
  7. KainXS

    KainXS

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,600 (2.21/day)
    Thanks Received:
    501
    it looks like the 32 rop one slightly, just slightly, edges out a GTX465

    lol i said it before, the top end GTX460 will be faster than the GTX465

  8. mdm-adph

    mdm-adph New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,478 (0.91/day)
    Thanks Received:
    340
    Location:
    Your house.
    Not bad -- good to see Nvidia back in the game! Competition is always good.
  9. Aleksander

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,254 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    304
    Still power consumption is worse than ATI :(
  10. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (3.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    At idle the power consumptio is better than all the ATi cards its faster than. Also its pretty fast for its max power consumption which is lower than alot of cards its faster than as well.
  11. Delta6326

    Delta6326

    Joined:
    May 21, 2008
    Messages:
    3,824 (1.67/day)
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    i would rather get the msi oc cyclone lower fan noise lower power on some and better performance out of box
  12. Aleksander

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,254 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    304
    Well, this card is just like 7600GS in its old good days ;)
  13. trt740

    trt740

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    10,935 (3.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,113
    W1zzard these still have lower texture units than say a gtx 285 correct? If so can you explain why the performance is as high as a 465? Is it true the 460 has more texture units than the 465? The reason I asked this is because the gtx 275 and gtx 285 seem to hang right with this card or beat it.
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2010
  14. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,788 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,490
    gtx 460 has 56 tmus, 470 has 44 tmus

    everything above 1280x1024 is 4xaa 16xaf when available in the game
    trt740 says thanks.
  15. trt740

    trt740

    Joined:
    May 12, 2006
    Messages:
    10,935 (3.60/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,113
    The 285 gtx has 80 or so correct?
  16. W1zzard

    W1zzard Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2004
    Messages:
    14,788 (3.93/day)
    Thanks Received:
    11,490
    yep
  17. Benetanegia

    Benetanegia New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    2,683 (1.48/day)
    Thanks Received:
    694
    Location:
    Reaching your left retina.
    I don't quite remember which specific differences exist, but the TMUs in Fermi are different. I do remember two important differences, but there were some more.

    1- Well, first one is not a difference in TMUs themselves, it's on the much improved caches, so that the utilization (efficiency) is better. In the past textures had to be local (because chaches we local), so if different threads (running in completely different shader cluster) needed the same texture, that texture needed to be loaded twice or as many times as required. In Fermi cahces are global, every shader multiprocessor has access to everything, so they just need to load it once.

    2- The second difference of lesser importance now, but still important for shadows and some other effects is the hardware jittering acceleration in Fermi's texture units. It's basically the ability to fetch four texels in one texture operation. Future games will see a greater improvement from this feature than now, but there is a small improvement even today.
    trt740 says thanks.
  18. BetA

    BetA New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    36 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Location:
    US and Germany
    ^^

    hmmm,

    i didnt saw any gtx 460 with Vram chip Cooling...
    is there a card that has good cooling and cooling on vram?
    i really love zotac, great cards, but this is kinda strange..

    wich one would be the best to buy?
    i want vram cooling, vrm cooling and overall a good cooling...

    greetz ViruS:nutkick:
  19. MN12BIRD

    MN12BIRD

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    Messages:
    471 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    78
    Might be because it uses DDR5 and should run cooler than DDR3?

    Card looks awesome. NVidia is definitely back in the game with this one!
  20. Aleksander

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    3,254 (1.88/day)
    Thanks Received:
    304
    Ram cooling is not needed anymore
  21. DrPepper

    DrPepper The Doctor is in the house

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    7,483 (3.09/day)
    Thanks Received:
    813
    Location:
    Scotland (It rains alot)
    I'd say its still needed to reach higher clocks.
  22. ktr

    ktr

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    7,407 (2.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    687
    Did Zotac forgot to place the thermal pad for the memory? Some body got their hands on a EVGA GTX460 with the same exact cooler, and it had the thermal pad.

    http://www.overclock.net/10024932-post3.html (scroll to bottom)

    Also, the EVGA suffers the same thermal performance as the Zotac, bummer.
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2010

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page