1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ZOTAC GeForce GTX 680 Listed for Pre-Order

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Mar 17, 2012.

  1. Crap Daddy

    Crap Daddy

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,796 (1.59/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,089
    Think of it as a mid-range chip in a high-end card.
     
    HumanSmoke and EarthDog say thanks.
  2. thematrix606 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2012
    Messages:
    89 (0.07/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16
    I don't know, they sell the gtx580 for around 400 euro, which is pretty average. 500 euro for the gtx680 seems right.
     
  3. TC-man

    TC-man

    Joined:
    May 25, 2011
    Messages:
    372 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    131
    Location:
    Netherlands
    It said it's sold out. And something like find the successor of this product via the search function on the upper left screen.
     
    NHKS says thanks.
  4. OneCool

    OneCool

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    850 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Location:
    Look behind you!!
    The rolls seem to be reversed on this.


    Used to be Nvidia = Big Block,AMD = Small block

    Nv had all memory bandwidth and brute force.

    AMD always did more for less,Less memory bandwidth Hotter clocks.


    Now it seems the rolls have reversed to me.


    Let the drag races BEGIN!!!!!!! :rockout:
     
  5. Dj-ElectriC

    Dj-ElectriC

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,384 (1.29/day)
    Thanks Received:
    913
    Uh... no they didn't, NVIDIA just decided that their GTX660Ti segment card should be GTX680 and fu*ked everybody up :)
     
    INSTG8R, nt300 and NHKS say thanks.
  6. puma99dk|

    puma99dk|

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    3,725 (1.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    903
    Location:
    Denmark....
    less memory srsly their HD 7950/7970 got 3gigs and the GTX 680 got 2gigs if u say that AMD got less there i think u need a calculator :roll:
     
  7. Rylan

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    Messages:
    22 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    3
    What in the world did you just type?
     
  8. OneCool

    OneCool

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    850 (0.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    68
    Location:
    Look behind you!!

    You say no but then spell out what i just said?

    Ok.......
     
  9. theeldest

    theeldest

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2006
    Messages:
    656 (0.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    140
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Don't blame either of them for their prices. As a business, it's in their best interest to charge as much as people are willing to pay for a card.

    Besides, they're both on the same track. Initial 28nm release is smaller chip than final release on 40nm. Gives better yields. The second gen 28nm will (i predict) bump back up to larger chips for the 700 series and 8000 series.
     
  10. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,238 (1.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,122
    The devils in the details...
    Example:
    AMD card review in comparison with Nvidia card....Nvidia card tested with PhysX on High preset
    Not quite an apples-to-apples comparison I would have thought.

    A better indicator would be sites whose reviews bounce between different games, resolutions, game i.q. and choice of (r)etail outlets for pricing quotes depending on what card/manufacturer is being reviewed. I can think of at least one site where the product being reviewed would be credited with a price from a large outlet like Newegg inclusive of MIR, while it's review competition is price quoted according to one of the most expensive etail outlets available.
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2012
    okidna and Dent1 say thanks.
  11. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,238 (1.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,122
    Double post- soz
     
  12. Dent1

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    3,373 (1.75/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,040
    They should really drop Physx support. What is crazy is in Batman Arkham City the GTX 580 gets less than half the frame rate with Physx enabled. Just goes to show what a worthless gimmick it is.

    Edit typo 580*. I sit very far from the monitor indeed.
     
    Last edited: Mar 17, 2012
  13. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,970 (6.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,905
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    Are you blind? That review above is a GTX580. Not a 680. Also Batman Arkham city uses the old Physx version that wasn't very good performance wise. Also PhysX in itself isn't a gimmick it is as of right now the only physics engine with effects that are in real time, rather then simulated or placed in like most games using Havok.
     
    Dent1 says thanks.
  14. Steevo

    Steevo

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2005
    Messages:
    9,058 (2.53/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,650
    http://www.nvidia.fr/object/physx_knowledge_base.html



    Cooking.


    Read
    Comprehend
    Post


    In a highly "optimized"game 50+% of physx are prerendred or precalculated to be rendered with the correct resolution later, or during game level loads.

    Google

    physxcooking.dll
     
    10 Million points folded for TPU
  15. Marv

    Marv New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    36 (0.02/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Location:
    Maidstone, UK
    I think you need to read - he quite clearly said memory bandwidth - IE: this new card from Nvidia is on a 256 bit wide memory bus, like the 5870 and 6970, whereas the 480 and 580 had 384 bit wide buses. Now the 7970 is at 384 bit, more like Nvidia's previous cards (GTX570 is 384 too) and the GTX680 is at 256.
     
  16. HumanSmoke

    HumanSmoke

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    2,238 (1.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,122
    Close.
    GTX 570 is 320
     
  17. Nkd New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    93 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    LOL, this is not high end? If it costs 500+ it is high end, and you can not convince me otherwise. You gonna come here and tell me that it is a mid range card just because it is based on gk104? That is a fanboy mentality. I will believe it is a mid range card when nvidia prices it like a midrange. You think Ati is not going to have anything up their sleeve when gtx 780 comes out? If you think so than you clearly are not thinking straight. This is a never ending cycle.
     
  18. bill_d New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2008
    Messages:
    35 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    reviewers should peel off the stickers to see if it says gtx 660 underneath :laugh:
     
  19. MxPhenom 216

    MxPhenom 216 Corsair Fanboy

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    10,970 (6.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,905
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    I sense a disturbance.....

    AMD fanboy?

    Saying that people who thing the GK104 is mid range is fanboyism, even though its following suit with the GF104 which was mid range, and then saying that we think that AMD wont have anything to respond with the 780, is fanboy mentality.
     
    GoldenTiger says thanks.
  20. erocker

    erocker Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2006
    Messages:
    40,769 (12.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    15,675
    Think of it as the best you're going to get right now and you're going to pay for it. :D That being said, the site listed in the article is charging less for Kepler then they are for 7970's.
     
    MxPhenom 216 says thanks.
  21. Nihilus

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    235 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
    The GTX 680 is a mid-range card? I always thought the x80s were at the high end. This card performs at HD 7970 levels!! If this "midrange" cost $500 or whatever the conversion is, how much will the fabled GTX 685 cost? $750?!
     
  22. Nihilus

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    235 (0.16/day)
    Thanks Received:
    24
    Hahaha yeah it really is pathetic. Apparently Nvidia has a 'GTX 685' or whatever right around the corner to destroy everything, yet it's the HD 7970 that has proven it's overclocking strength and could easily be bumped up into a new HD 7980.

    But wait - GTX 780 will own everything!!! No way ATi will release an HD 8790, though :rolleyes:
     
  23. guerco New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2012
    Messages:
    1 (0.00/day)
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Nvidia vs AMD?

    Who gives a shit if I can play a game with 5 or 10 more frames per second, as long as its playable with this generation's or previous generations graphics cards? Why did everyone forget about nvidia's and then ati's price fixing scandal? which they sedaled with the plaintiffs out of court a couple of years ago. These two companies are reaping all the benefits of all you're ignorance. Stop wasting your money. I wish their was a third company in the mix. Then we'd see some fair prices and more innovation.
     
  24. BumbleBee

    BumbleBee

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2009
    Messages:
    5,310 (2.24/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,703
    Location:
    Cybertron aka Canada
    I think some people would roll you up in a carpet and throw you off a bridge before they give up video games haha
     
    driver66 says thanks.
  25. Shurakai

    Shurakai

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    233 (0.08/day)
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Location:
    Australia, SA
    Personally I think Nvidia should've just went ahead with their original plan and released this GK104 as the 660, but no, they noticed it performed on par with the 7970 so they decided to rename it 680 and price it accordingly. Sad really, that would've really shook AMD off their current early release throne and caused one hell of a price war.

    Dunno about anyone else but I like seeing the companies topple each other over and over. :)
     

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)

Share This Page