Tuesday, September 11 2007
Today, AMD announced a limited edition of the X2 6000+ which is rated at TDP of 89W. There is no physical differences between the 125W and 89W 90nm SOI processors, except the new labelling: ADA6000IAA6CZ. Both CPUs operate at 3.0GHz and have 2x 1MB L2 cache. The 89W edition operates 1.3v in contrast to 1.35V on the 125W version.



Source: OCWorkbench
posted by malware - 7:16 PM |  Related News

User comments
by jocksteeluk (September 11th - 7:42 PM) - Reply
that is a decent wattage drop the only problem with these new releases is they are not AM3 compatible due to the on chip memory controller and no doubt a lot of people will be waiting for the Amd quad core chips which are backwards compatible to am2+ atleast.
by panchoman (September 11th - 7:54 PM) - Reply
seems like amd is improving some of its older processors to fall back on in the case that intel beats them in the quad core race..
by breakfromyou (September 11th - 8:28 PM) - Reply
by: jocksteeluk
that is a decent wattage drop the only problem with these new releases is they are not AM3 compatible due to the on chip memory controller and no doubt a lot of people will be waiting for the Amd quad core chips which are backwards compatible to am2+ atleast.
wrong. according to speculation at least.

Phenom will be compatible with AM2, AM2+, and AM3.
by WarEagleAU (September 11th - 8:30 PM) - Reply
Lower watts, lower heat, I wonder if these OC better than the 125W ones.
by panchoman (September 11th - 8:33 PM) - Reply
by: WarEagleAU
Lower watts, lower heat, I wonder if these OC better than the 125W ones.
it probably will..
by rodneyhchef (September 11th - 8:36 PM) - Reply
I wonder if the 6400 will also get this upgrade. In the original unofficial news that the 6400 was coming, it said that it would have this lower TDP as well. It's an interesting prospect for those who can't wait for phenom. :)
by pbmaster (September 11th - 8:37 PM) - Reply
I couldn't wait for Phenom lol...I love my 6000+. Even if it is the 125w version I was able to get it to 3.3 GHz on air.
by cdawall (September 11th - 9:16 PM) - Reply
i want phenom in my hands not this old 90nm i dont care bahhh
by mdm-adph (September 11th - 10:25 PM) - Reply
by: cdawall
i want phenom in my hands not this old 90nm i dont care bahhh
What, you gonna stick that Phenom in that ol' socket 754 you got there? :roll:

Like I need to be talkin'.
by KennyT772 (September 11th - 10:31 PM) - Reply
Yeah because speedbinning makes chips incompatable with new chipsets... right jocksteeluk.

All this shows is that yeilds are improving on these new chips allowing for lower vcores and higher clock speeds.
by cdawall (September 12th - 12:12 AM) - Reply
by: mdm-adph
What, you gonna stick that Phenom in that ol' socket 754 you got there? :roll:

Like I need to be talkin'.
lol no kidding s370 vs s754 wonder who wins?
by mdm-adph (September 12th - 2:21 PM) - Reply
by: cdawall
lol no kidding s370 vs s754 wonder who wins?
As you get older, you'll realize that it's not always about who finishes first, but more about who can last the longest. ;)
Post your own comment
3669 Users online, 2.98 mbps
Quick Search
Already a member?
Username:
Password:
Register Here!
New Forum Posts
10:00 by Cold Storm
>>> The Left 4 Dead *2* Clubhouse! (357)
09:54 by athenaesword
*GTX 260/280 Unofficial TPU! Thread* (1745)
09:53 by Mussels
NVIDIA 191.07 driver dangerous? (18)
09:52 by 1Kurgan1
New Bad Company 2 Footage! (74)
09:44 by Yukikaze
Really low profile LGA775 cooler ? (4)
09:39 by Mussels
Anime Nation (3517)
09:37 by JTS
ATI Graphics (Interesting) (27)
09:31 by JTS
Razer Pro Click v1.6 Mouse (13)
09:30 by johnspack
Very dissapointed in Palit! (23)
Last Articles

Popular Articles