Once again. Keep the trolling/flaming to a minimum.

My bad, i just don't understand why even Mac users would wont this, its just a bigger version of the iphone and i would of thought that an increase in size would be a bad thing, an inconvenience?

Id just wait and get the Lenovo version of this, its way better.

Why?

I find it a strange coincidence that this weekend 500'000 women will have their period and go looking for apple's ipad.

johnnyfiiveTo all the Apple bashing... please stop. You all know the iPad is a fantastic product, just except it.

Meh, it's just a bigger Iphone... but without the phone. Just another way to cash in on the mindless mainstream my slapping there logo on it and calling it innovative. That money could be going to something much more useful then a wide screen version of the Ipod Touch.

I own a MBP and love it. Best of both world, running win 7 for my activclient software and games, which I honestly have no problem playing with the 1440x900 screen. However I would not buy this iPad, it just seems pointless honestly. I would buy this phone long before I ever thought of buying an iPad

now.sprint.com/evo/?ECID=MA:AB:20100323:4G:EVO:FEAT:300x250
1GHZ processor
HDMI cable
2 camera's one is 8MP
HD video play back and much more.
Plus you can talk and video conference with it.
Seems like the better purchase to me.

600,000 units! thats 300mil on the weekend.

wonder how much each ipad costs them to build?

I love the itouch/phone, but the ipad is a big itouch... Still, I find the iPad not so bad, if it were at 300$, big max 400$.... but 500$? Yea, no thxs, rip-off by alot

I for one welcome the iPad.

Don't get me wrong, I will probably never buy one, but the concept is a good one. Why? Well, if you can look past the deficiencies (lack of flash, lack of multi-tasking, no webcam, iphone OS rather than full OSX, price), which will probably get fixed in future versions, and look at it's strong points, then it actually starts to make sense.

As an e-reader, it looks fantastic. Publishers, especially magazines, will be tripping over themselves to get their digital magazines on the iPad. All the usual glossy content will look as good, if not better, on the iPad than in print. Also they can put more content in. Why put just a photo of Lindsey Lohan flashing her bits when they can put the whole video on the page? And this is not to mention the cheaper distribution costs.
On top of the e-reader, it also does e-mail (and the other million pathetic fucking apps), and grandma doesn't need a whole, full-functioning OS just to e-mail Frankie in Minnesota. No, she just needs a big iTouch that will also deliver her monthly copy of Country Music Monthly straight to her lounge sitting chair.

Don't get me wrong, I hate Apple like the rest of you - iTunes + Quicktime are the devil to me, but I do see a positive future for the iPad. And I do think it will have a net positive effect on digital content and distribution.


-:sits back and waits for the flames to engulf:-

PS 'iPad' is such a stupid fucking name - they should have just called it 'iTouch' and re-branded the old one as 'iTouch mini'.

Is it true the apple ipad does not use flash and has no wi-fi?

tiggerIs it true the apple ipad does not use flash and has no wi-fi?

It has wi-fi but no flash support.

DrPepperIt has wi-fi but no flash support.

And 3G if you want to pay for it.

Man most of you guys are bashing the iPad even if you guys havent used it. Its pricey alright. But its a neat device in my opinion. I own a iPod Touch. I love it. So far Apple has been awesome. So the iPad cant be that bad. Its obviously targeted for one type of market. Because of the large screen and the light weight its easy to get your stuff done. Typing is supposed to be a piece of cake on it.

:twitch: i didn't think they were going to sell more than 50,000 but i geese there are alot of apple fans. this thing is over priced for what it can do

Delta6326this thing is over priced for what it can do

So was the iPod when it was first released.

gumptySo was the iPod when it was first released.

How much for an iPod in 2005?

No flash support is a bit daft.

The HP Slate is coming anyway, and it's just one of many.

I don't like that it uses the iPhone OS, why can't it run a slimmed down OSX, then it would feel more useable. I don't really see this one being all that useful, the idea of it is sound, but if they used a better operating system, then it could have far more uses.

I might look at getting a similar product, more features, for less money.

entropy13How much for an iPod in 2005?

iPod 5GB was $400 in 2001.

gumptyiPod 5GB was $400 in 2001.

So let's assume then it's only $150 in 2005...good thing I went with a Walkman phone instead (470MB+4GB MSPro Duo). But then again I haven't really bought and used extensively anything from Apple...(because they're always expensive and apparently a sign of being "cool" even if you aren't).

entropy13So let's assume then it's only $150 in 2005...good thing I went with a Walkman phone instead (470MB+4GB MSPro Duo). But then again I haven't really bought and used extensively anything from Apple...(because they're always expensive and apparently a sign of being "cool" even if you aren't).

The first iPod mini (4GB) arrived in 2004 @ ~$250; by then the standard iPod was 15GB and was ~$300.

But anyway, yes apple gear is generally overpriced - but that is part of their business brand strategy I imagine.

I've owned a iPod for a couple of years now. I like it. I listen to my music on my way to work. I will not consider getting an iPhone until it has the capacity to hold my ~40GB of music, as I don't see the point of owning both - and even then only if it's contracts become shorter (or significantly cheaper).

gumptyThe first iPod mini (4GB) arrived in 2004 @ ~$250; by then the standard iPod was 15GB and was ~$300.

But anyway, yes apple gear is generally overpriced - but that is part of their business brand strategy I imagine.

I've owned a iPod for a couple of years now. I like it. I listen to my music on my way to work. I will not consider getting an iPhone until it has the capacity to hold my ~40GB of music, as I don't see the point of owning both - and even then only if it's contracts become shorter (or significantly cheaper).

You can get an iPod Touch 64GB. :rolleyes:

Plus you gets tons of cool apps. Your iPod wont even be able to touch or even sense the iTouch (its worlds apart and will be a definite replacement:cool: ) :p

mdsx1950You can get an iPod Touch 64GB. :rolleyes:

Plus you gets tons of cool apps. Your iPod wont even be able to touch or even sense the iTouch (its worlds apart and will be a definite replacement:cool: ) :p

Yeah, if I had to replace my iPod right now I would probably get something like that. Ideally I want to combine my phone & music so I only need one device. If my situation changes, for instance, I might not need the iPod as much, so could put up with listening to music via a clunky phone interface.

I don't know how you guys do it... I only have 3-5gb of music

how do you have 10x that?