Wednesday, November 14th 2012
Dell UltraSharp U2913WM 29-Inch Monitor Goes on Sale, in Australia
Following on LG's footsteps, Dell has introduced its own 29-inch monitor with a 21:9 aspect ratio, the UltraSharp U2913WM. This new UltraSharp model features an IPS panel, LED backlighting, a native resolution of 2560 x 1080 pixels, a 99% Adobe RGB coverage, a 5 ms response time, D-Sub, DVI, HDMI and DisplayPort connectivity, a three-port USB 3.0 hub, and a stand allowing for height, tilt and swivel adjustment.
The UltraSharp U2913WM has started selling in Australia for AUD662.20 (~ USD 687.80).
Source:
TFT Central
The UltraSharp U2913WM has started selling in Australia for AUD662.20 (~ USD 687.80).
49 Comments on Dell UltraSharp U2913WM 29-Inch Monitor Goes on Sale, in Australia
2. Set as wallpaper w/stretch setting.
3. Instant porn star. :pimp:
To put this monitor's physical viewable height into perspective, then
29.0" 2560x1080 (11.27" high) = 18.0" 1280x1024 (11.24" high) = 21.2" 1920x1200 or 2560x1600 (11.24" high)
Although I can see problems with this being used in the real world, ie games not supporting that resolution etc. Although I do realise this is not a gaming monitor.
14.12"x19.7"
It would be super grand for gaming on 2 thirds, web browsing on the other 3rd i wonder lol.
Good for productivity?
All in all, it looks great, but I would prefer the PRINCEof resolutions, 1:1 2048x2048 like you get in Air Traffic control, or the KINGof displays, native 6MP (3280 x 2048) in 30"
DO WANT DO WANT DO WANT GIMME GIMME GIMME
www.barco.com/en/products-solutions/displays-monitors-workstations/medical-displays/diagnostic-displays/10-megapixel-wide-screen-diagnostic-grayscale-display-system.aspx?tab=specs
Silly (after all those years) would still love an IBM T221.
Though if I had that kind of money for a new monitor, I'd probably spend the extra and get a 2560x1440 model for the X. The things I'd do for more X...
Hopefully Intel isn't pulling our cables and they really want to get the resolution train rolling again! Less compromise becase of more choices and lower prices.
I wager that every game (that already supports widescreen) would run this res perfectly. But they're going to require editing of the config file (easy for most games).
I work with y, x most of the time instead of x, y so I usually get it backwards.