Wednesday, June 21st 2017

CryEngine to Support Vulkan Renderer in Upcoming 5.4 Update

CryEngine, the rendering prodigy responsible for some of the most visually impressive titles ever to grace our personal computing and gaming shores, is getting a Vulkan renderer. The news were broken down by the team at Crytek through a blog post, where they reaffirmed their commitment to proper GitHub support and updates for their game engine. The company puts it this way:

"Vulkan renderer
Following on from the renderer refactoring and DirectX 12 implementation, the team has been hard at work implementing a Vulkan renderer. The code can be seen in Code/RenderDll/XRenderD3D9/Vulkan/… although the feature is not functional, yet. We want to make these changes available to you for review whilst we are currently stabilizing the engine for our 5.4 release. So you can track our progress on GitHub until 5.4 is finally here by the end of July."
This comes as good news for everyone, I wager, since Vulkan has been showing more promise in actual performance improvements in real world gaming scenarios than Microsoft's poster child DX12. Granted that CryEngine isn't the resource hog and graphics-card humbler that it was once before, when it birthed the famous "But can it run Crysis?" adage. It has turned from being one of the more resource intensive engines to a more streamlined, arguably better performant one. Here's hoping Crytek's upcoming Hunt: Showdown already provides support for the Vulkan renderer. A game as graphically beautiful as that one clearly deserves the performance to go with it.
Source: Cryengine.com
Add your own comment

31 Comments on CryEngine to Support Vulkan Renderer in Upcoming 5.4 Update

#26
rtwjunkie
PC Gaming Enthusiast
Hugh MungusJust stick with what works and check if the updates don't have bugs. Simple. Two minutes max.

No, I don't own ryzen yet. Getting threadripper 16-core, though. I have done my research.
@cdawall has done his research too....extensively, first hand, and posted here on this forum. He may have been the first to get it among any members, and tested it thoroughly, long before W1zzard got one.
Posted on Reply
#27
TheinsanegamerN
Hugh MungusJust stick with what works and check if the updates don't have bugs. Simple. Two minutes max.

No, I don't own ryzen yet. Getting threadripper 16-core, though. I have done my research.
If you did research, you would know that memory support for ryzen is still touch and go, especially when using 4 DIMMs, and also varies wildly between manufacturer and product.

Doesnt mean ryzen is bad, but to claim intel is unreliable while stating that ryzen somehow has no issues is a blatant showing of ignorance.
Posted on Reply
#28
Unregistered
TheinsanegamerNIf you did research, you would know that memory support for ryzen is still touch and go, especially when using 4 DIMMs, and also varies wildly between manufacturer and product.

Doesnt mean ryzen is bad, but to claim intel is unreliable while stating that ryzen somehow has no issues is a blatant showing of ignorance.
Again, I did my research. I'm only going up to 4 DIMMs now threadripper is coming and I had three or 4 different ryzen 7 build options that all would have used compatible RAM. Would have done the same amount of research for intel as well.

Looking forward to finally getting my 32GB 3200mhz or more, 16-core threadripper and top of the line rx vega pc built!
Posted on Edit | Reply
#29
cdawall
where the hell are my stars
Hugh MungusJust stick with what works and check if the updates don't have bugs. Simple. Two minutes max.

No, I don't own ryzen yet. Getting threadripper 16-core, though. I have done my research.
You obviously haven't done any research on this...
rtwjunkie@cdawall has done his research too....extensively, first hand, and posted here on this forum. He may have been the first to get it among any members, and tested it thoroughly, long before W1zzard got one.
I doubt I was the first on this forum, first to post about it maybe. I also did extensive hands on research went through a couple kits of memory out of curiosity and settled on an absurdly expensive single sided -b kit from corsair :roll: I have also played with just about every board outside of the Biostar models. All of them are still garbage and you can definitely tell the BIOS is not a finished product.

Threadripper will not be any better out of the box, the way the CCX units communicate will not be a good thing and thinking differently means you really don't understand how infinity fabric works.

It seems as if people don't realize it is just the hypertransport protocol that has been updated. It is no different than the FSB of old and is a limiting factor.
Posted on Reply
#30
_larry
I bet they remaster Crysis 1, 2 and 3 with Vulkan.
I would buy still buy it though lol
Posted on Reply
#31
_larry
cdawallYou obviously haven't done any research on this...



I doubt I was the first on this forum, first to post about it maybe. I also did extensive hands on research went through a couple kits of memory out of curiosity and settled on an absurdly expensive single sided -b kit from corsair :roll: I have also played with just about every board outside of the Biostar models. All of them are still garbage and you can definitely tell the BIOS is not a finished product.

Threadripper will not be any better out of the box, the way the CCX units communicate will not be a good thing and thinking differently means you really don't understand how infinity fabric works.

It seems as if people don't realize it is just the hypertransport protocol that has been updated. It is no different than the FSB of old and is a limiting factor.
Thread Ripper is more of a Server type CPU, just like Intel Xeon line. I have been fully satisfied with my Ryzen 5 1600X so far. I have it sitting at a solid 4ghz overclock 24/7 on air lol
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 24th, 2024 15:06 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts