Wednesday, June 12th 2019

Intel Announces New Chief People Officer Sandra Rivera

Intel has announced that Sandra Rivera will take on a new role as the company's chief people officer and executive vice president, reporting to CEO Bob Swan. She will lead the human resources organization and serve as steward of Intel's culture evolution as it transforms to a data-centric company. Previously, Rivera was responsible for the Network Platforms Group, and served as Intel's 5G executive sponsor.

"Sandra is a role model for an Intel that is customer obsessed, collaborative and fearless while firmly grounded in trust, transparency and inclusivity. I am thrilled that Sandra will lead this critical part of our strategy to power a data-centric world," Swan said. "In a company driven by deep, technical talent, Sandra is an excellent technical leader who builds successful businesses by first building great teams. I am confident Sandra, as chief people officer, will help us accelerate our transformation and position our Intel team to play a bigger role in our customers' success."
Rivera replaces Matt Smith, who announced his retirement after more than 20 years at the company in a variety of HR and legal leadership positions, including most recently serving as Intel's chief human resources officer.

"Our people are our greatest asset and are the fuel by which we extend our rich history and success of driving technology innovations that positively impact the world. The culture evolution work that we're driving forward is integrally tied to our business transformation. You can't have one without the other," Rivera said.

With Rivera transitioning to her new role, Intel will combine its network infrastructure organization with its programmable solutions organization under the leadership of Dan McNamara. The merging of these two business groups allows Intel to bring maximum value to our customers by delivering unprecedented and seamless access to Intel's broad portfolio of products, from Xeon, SoC, FPGA, eASIC, full custom to software, IP, systems and solutions across the cloud, enterprise, network, embedded and IoT markets.
Add your own comment

26 Comments on Intel Announces New Chief People Officer Sandra Rivera

#1
nemesis.ie
So someone that was doing networking and sponsoring the cancelled 5G stuff is now doing HR/people and culture transformation? Curious.

I can see how it could work; if she can talk to the tech people "in their language" and understand the HR side and bring it all together, a challenging role for sure.
Posted on Reply
#2
Vya Domus
FouquinAre you implying that being a person of color, a women, both, or otherwise is mutually exclusive to being talented, educated, and fit for a position at a company such as Intel?
He's implying that hiring based on the diversity criteria is the wrong thing to do. You hire who is the better employee for the position, if that happens to result in a divers workplace, fine, if not, fine. But I am sure you knew very well what he meant just as we know that you're just virtue signaling.

Anyway, doesn't matter, a thread clean-up is inbound.
Posted on Reply
#3
ssdpro
Vya DomusAnyway, doesn't matter, a thread clean-up is inbound.
Needed. Users like Joss or Stimpy always visit articles like this and offer a "translation" that a woman being hired must have been to meet some social agenda not because she was actually the most qualified. A company worth about 200 billion doesn't need hiring advice; they have obviously handled that just fine.
Posted on Reply
#4
Joss
ssdproand offer a "translation" that a woman being hired
There's nothing in my post about Sandra Rivera, it's about what she's charged with doing.
And my position is not of the translator, I'm interpreting this news as a sign that Intel is not reacting rationally to the competition AMD is bringing. And I find this as yet another sign that Intel hasn't been properly managed for some time now.
Posted on Reply
#5
Beertintedgoggles
ssdproNeeded. Users like Joss or Stimpy always visit articles like this and offer a "translation" that a woman being hired must have been to meet some social agenda not because she was actually the most qualified. A company worth about 200 billion doesn't need hiring advice; they have obviously handled that just fine.
Ha, someone coming in here white-knighting yet fails to understand the issue. I haven't seen anyone claiming Sandra was a diversity hire / promotion (whatever this move is). What they (presumably), and myself as well, are jaded by is the included bit, "Sandra is a role model for an Intel that is customer obsessed, collaborative and fearless while firmly grounded in trust, transparency and inclusivity." Why can't it just read as, "Sandra is a role model for an Intel that is customer obsessed, collaborative and fearless while firmly grounded in trust, transparency and putting the best people to work on the project." It doesn't quite have the same ring to it, nor the same virtue signaling but that's where we should all be headed; a society where you are judged by merit and ability, not the color of your skin, gender, age, etc. You know, the one MLK Jr was pushing.
Posted on Reply
#6
ArchStupid
FouquinAre you implying that being a person of color, a women, both, or otherwise is mutually exclusive to being talented, educated, and fit for a position at a company such as Intel?
What now? How in the hell did you understand that from his comment?
Posted on Reply
#7
medi01
Since when does head of HR lead companies "into cloud"?

Are we talking about the same cloud here?\
ssdproNeeded. Users like Joss or Stimpy always visit articles like this and offer a "translation" that a woman being hired must have been to meet some social agenda not because she was actually the most qualified. A company worth about 200 billion doesn't need hiring advice; they have obviously handled that just fine.
Women are overrepresented in HRs, 70%+, dear stranger.
She has become head of HR.
Whether or not Intel feels like harming itself by sexist and racist "positive discrimination" hiring practices, to hire people based on identity, not merit, is up to Intel.
Posted on Reply
#8
Prince Valiant
nemesis.ieSo someone that was doing networking and sponsoring the cancelled 5G stuff is now doing HR/people and culture transformation? Curious.

I can see how it could work; if she can talk to the tech people "in their language" and understand the HR side and bring it all together, a challenging role for sure.
When did Intel officially can their 5G products?
Posted on Reply
#9
nemesis.ie
Prince ValiantWhen did Intel officially can their 5G products?
April? I'm sure a quick internet search will tell you. I refer to their 5G modems of course, the other things they are "in 5G" with could mostly be applied to anything (e.g. networking to base stations) so I don't really consider it 5G, it's just doing things in that market, rather than developing anything specific (or that's what it appears to be anyway).
Posted on Reply
#11
R-T-B
stimpy88You know full well what he is saying
No, it really could've fooled me too.
JossNo, you're implying it, you racist, sexist, homophobic bigot! :laugh:
Nice try. Now it's super transparent.
Beertintedgogglesmerit and ability
That'd be all well and good if all social groups were on equal footing and some not set several steps back by horrific historical practices. You know this isn't the case.
ArchStupidWhat now? How in the hell did you understand that from his comment?
I would assume by reading it and following it to it's logical conclusion, which sadly as I said above may even be true but that's exactly why we need to try to break out of these historically preset molds.
Posted on Reply
#12
ArchStupid
ssdproNeeded. Users like Joss or Stimpy always visit articles like this and offer a "translation" that a woman being hired must have been to meet some social agenda not because she was actually the most qualified. A company worth about 200 billion doesn't need hiring advice; they have obviously handled that just fine.
It's not advice, it's criticism.
Also the company being worth 200 billion is not an argument, it's just appeal to authority.
Posted on Reply
#13
Vya Domus
R-T-BI'm genuinely amazed in this day and age the word "inclusive" has begun to trigger... certain... people.
I can't really say anything about that but I personally never understood how inclusivity is supposed to work.
Posted on Reply
#14
Beertintedgoggles
Sorry to add fuel to the flames but I don't understand why there isn't such a push for inclusivity in the trades. No one cares that there are more men mechanics, construction workers, electricians, plumbers, etc.... Is it only the "easy" jobs that are appealing? Are people moving their focus now to these desk jobs which are also seen as "easy". Technical jobs are not as easy as they appear on the outside. Math/calculus/Boolean (logics in another word) , programming, physics.... I excelled in all of those, you know what was rare.... seeing a woman in those courses. I'm not saying they weren't there, some were also decent. They did take up an unproportionate amount of the professor's attention and time. However when the push for diversity comes in the corporate world, why doesn't anyone look at the percentages represented in the STEM fields of study and "award" positions based on that and not total population?
Posted on Reply
#15
Joss
BeertintedgogglesNo one cares that there are more men mechanics, construction workers, electricians, plumbers, etc....
Or miners, fishing boat sailors, forest workers etc....
Why? Because "inclusivity" has nothing to do with justice and has all to do with Ideology, namely Marxist and Frankfurt School.
"Women" here is not a group of people but an abstract concept in a grandiose theory that demands the overhaul of Society.
Posted on Reply
#16
95Viper
Stay on topic.
Take your personal discussions to PM/Conv.
No more off topic BS.
Take this as a warning.

Thank You.
Posted on Reply
#17
R-T-B
Vya DomusI can't really say anything about that but I personally never understood how inclusivity is supposed to work.
Therein lies the catch. It's tough getting a working implementation that doesn't upset people for not catering to them vs someone else.

But the base idea offending people is what baffles me. Just because it's diffilcult to attain an even spread across society does not make pushing for it a bad thing.

I'm actually on the fence re "affirmative action" type programs. I understand why they exist and even their goals, but I feel they are sort of the wrong way to tackle what at it's core is a poverty driven divide along race and other lines. I don't have much else in the way of ideas though, so honestly, I leave it to people smarter than me to figure out.

Just thought I'd drop this, lest it get lost in the drama.
95ViperTake your personal discussions to PM/Conv.
Thanks, but if anyone PMs me discussions like that, I won't be participating. I appreciate the cleanup, but I prefer respectful/sane debate out in the open, without name calling.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 24th, 2024 01:51 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts