Wednesday, January 29th 2020

AMD to Debut 2nd Gen RDNA Architecture in 2020

AMD CEO Dr Lisa Su, in her Q4-2019 and FY-2019 earnings call, confirmed that the company debut its second-generation RDNA graphics architecture in 2020. "In 2019 we launched our new architecture in GPUs, it's the RDNA architecture, and that was the Navi-based products. You should expect those will be refreshed in 2020, and we will have our new next-generation RDNA architecture that will be part our 2020 lineup."

Second-gen RDNA, or RDNA2, is expected to leverage the new 7 nm+ (EUV) silicon fabrication process at TSMC, to dial up transistor-counts, clock-speeds, and performance. Among the two anticipated feature additions are VRS (variable rate shading) and possibly ray-tracing. The fabled "big Navi" silicon, a GPU larger than "Navi 10," is also on the cards, according to an earlier statement by Dr Su. More details about these upcoming graphics cards are expected to be put out in March, at the 2020 AMD Investor Day conference.
Add your own comment

81 Comments on AMD to Debut 2nd Gen RDNA Architecture in 2020

#26
moproblems99
efikkanRTX 2080 Ti, draws way less than 300W
I am fine with it drawing 300w, honestly. That extra 50w is about $0.52 a month for me. If I keep it two years, that is about $12 for its life. Just get the performance up there.
Posted on Reply
#27
efikkan
moproblems99I am fine with it drawing 300w, honestly. That extra 50w is about $0.52 a month for me. If I keep it two years, that is about $12 for its life. Just get the performance up there.
Heat, noise and long-term stability are major issues. ~250W is close to the limit for most gamers.
Dies with higher thermal density are also harder to cool. And at some point I believe you will run into issues with the heatpipes to stop working.
Posted on Reply
#28
Mr.Mopar392
moproblems99What if it isn't a man?
OK slick rick let him/her or it by whatever the hell they want!
Posted on Reply
#29
moproblems99
efikkanHeat, noise and long-term stability are major issues. ~250W is close to the limit for most gamers.
Dies with higher thermal density are also harder to cool. And at some point I believe you will run into issues with the heatpipes to stop working.
There are plenty of gamers who can manage a 300w card with no complaints. If they make a card comparable in performance to NV but at higher power, it will sell just dandily.

300w cards have come and gone through time and not had any worse longevity than others. Plenty of Hawaii cards are still kicking.
Posted on Reply
#30
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
moproblems99There are plenty of gamers who can manage a 300w card with no complaints. If they make a card comparable in performance to NV but at higher power, it will sell just dandily.

300w cards have come and gone through time and not had any worse longevity than others. Plenty of Hawaii cards are still kicking.
Mine.
Posted on Reply
#31
gridracedriver
windwhirlNo.

When Dr. Su said "refresh" she didn't mean new iterations of the currently available GPUs, but rather completely new products.

This according to a news article from Tom's, since they asked AMD for clarification on this.
we hope so, it would be perfect.
But I find it difficult that they throw Navi10 and Navi14 after just one year of life

we'll see
Posted on Reply
#33
Totally
bugOnce again, I was right: Navi in its first incarnation, does not scale beyond 5700XT.
You weren't the only, I was saying the same.
Posted on Reply
#35
eidairaman1
The Exiled Airman
moproblems99Yours?
290 here
Posted on Reply
#36
moproblems99
eidairaman1290 here
What are you talking about?
Posted on Reply
#37
R0H1T
moproblems99Plenty of Hawaii cards are still kicking.
This :toast:
eidairaman1Mine.
Posted on Reply
#38
moproblems99
R0H1TThis :toast:
That's what sentences are for if you quote an entire post.
Posted on Reply
#39
moob
Gmr_ChickThat's my biggest concern about going the RX 5000 series route over the RTX 20 series route at the moment. I've used Radeon GPUs in all my builds since the HD 7790 and never had a problem with them -- my current GPU is an RX 580 and I haven't had any problems with it *knocks on some wood*. I know AMD has a reputation for having wonky GPU drivers, but my personal experiences have been good thus far. But having read about all the issues people are still having with Navi (or rather, the drivers) even 6 months into its life is rather troubling to say the least. That's why I'm leaning towards an RTX card at the moment
Please don't let a loud, vocal minority on reddit sway your purchasing decision. If the 5700 series really was as terrible as some make it out to be, they'd be panned on all user-reviews. For example, look at the user-reviews for the ASUS TUF 5700XT, which is an objectively terrible card, versus higher quality 5700XT models. The ASUS card is rightfully maligned, whereas the higher quality cards aren't. Also, there'd be a massive volume of returns, but from what we've heard from retail channels, that isn't happening. If you look around you'll see professional reviewers aren't having the level of issues that the minority on reddit are having, and they're testing numerous 5700XTs across dozens of games for scores of hours. I'm not saying that there couldn't be some sort of hardware incompatibility that's affecting some users, and that's definitely a possibility, but a more likely possibility for some of the complaints is user-error.
Posted on Reply
#40
Space Lynx
Astronaut
Mr.Mopar392I love my 5700XT you will never catch a nvidia card in my rig ever, and I will never convince someone on what to buy, let the man buy what the hell he wants.



The irony
I am, but they have a right to know the drivers don't work a lot of times. Even GamersNexus is still reporting several crashes, though much has improved since launch. Sorry for informing people about facts... I'll go now, lol.
Gmr_ChickThat's my biggest concern about going the RX 5000 series route over the RTX 20 series route at the moment. I've used Radeon GPUs in all my builds since the HD 7790 and never had a problem with them -- my current GPU is an RX 580 and I haven't had any problems with it *knocks on some wood*. I know AMD has a reputation for having wonky GPU drivers, but my personal experiences have been good thus far. But having read about all the issues people are still having with Navi (or rather, the drivers) even 6 months into its life is rather troubling to say the least. That's why I'm leaning towards an RTX card at the moment
Just go for the full AMD build again, worst case scenario is Freesync doesn't work for you above 120hz or something else about it you don't like, like crashes being a constant, etc. If that is the case then just refund within 30 days and make sure you buy from somewhere that has 30 day refunds, Amazon and Best Buy are good though but a lot of companies now don't allow 30 day refunds. Just make sure you test plenty of older games and newer before you make your final decision to keep or not. Maybe you will be very happy, and maybe not, no risk though really, so I say go all in and enjoy AMD when the time comes.
Posted on Reply
#41
moob
lynx29I am, but they have a right to know the drivers don't work a lot of times. Even GamersNexus is still reporting several crashes, though much has improved since launch. Sorry for informing people about facts... I'll go now, lol.
Steve said the opposite of that, but sure:
Edit: Timestamp didn't seem to work but it's at around 2:10.
Posted on Reply
#42
efikkan
Navi has been on the market for over 6 months now, and only featured minor driver changes over Vega. There is no excuse for having continuous stability issues at this point.
Posted on Reply
#43
Space Lynx
Astronaut
moobSteve said the opposite of that, but sure:
Edit: Timestamp didn't seem to work but it's at around 2:10.
towards the end of the video he said he spoke with AMD team there about issues that still need to be fixed and have not been addressed. thanks though, saw that video when it was first posted.
Posted on Reply
#44
Darmok N Jalad
I wonder if Navi refresh is going to be like the 2000 series Ryzen launch, where AMD already had more improvements in the works, but had to stop somewhere so they could launch the 1000 series. As it is, Navi saw efficiency gains over Vega, not needing near as many CUs and less complex memory. Look how it compares to Radeon VII, using less power at the same 7nm process. Not sure what the results will be, but clearly AMD has found a far more effective architecture.
Posted on Reply
#45
moproblems99
Darmok N JaladNot sure what the results will be, but clearly AMD has found a far more effective architecture.
A very steep hill to the climb. I would be very impressed (and hopeful) if they could pull this off
Posted on Reply
#46
Gmr_Chick
moobPlease don't let a loud, vocal minority on reddit sway your purchasing decision. If the 5700 series really was as terrible as some make it out to be, they'd be panned on all user-reviews. For example, look at the user-reviews for the ASUS TUF 5700XT, which is an objectively terrible card, versus higher quality 5700XT models. The ASUS card is rightfully maligned, whereas the higher quality cards aren't. Also, there'd be a massive volume of returns, but from what we've heard from retail channels, that isn't happening. If you look around you'll see professional reviewers aren't having the level of issues that the minority on reddit are having, and they're testing numerous 5700XTs across dozens of games for scores of hours. I'm not saying that there couldn't be some sort of hardware incompatibility that's affecting some users, and that's definitely a possibility, but a more likely possibility for some of the complaints is user-error.
Heh, you will be happy to know that thanks to Hardware Unboxed youtube channel, I'm not going anywhere NEAR any of the ASUS cards, especially the TUF ones. I don't understand why that damn thing is still on sale when it's clearly a PoS. Maybe instead of calling it "The Ultimate Force" Asus should call it "The Ultimate Flop" eh? In all seriousness though, I've done my homework and know to stay awake from the MSI Evoke (and the MECH), both the Asus TUF and STRIX cards (seriously, how much longer are they gonna recycle that design?), as well as ASROCK's Challenger. I'm more than likely going to go with Sapphire's Nitro+ 5700XT. Been using them since my HD 7790 and they've always been top-notch. It'll be good to have a triple fan card again -- haven't had one since my Tri-X 280X
Posted on Reply
#47
Space Lynx
Astronaut
Gmr_ChickHeh, you will be happy to know that thanks to Hardware Unboxed youtube channel, I'm not going anywhere NEAR any of the ASUS cards, especially the TUF ones. I don't understand why that damn thing is still on sale when it's clearly a PoS. Maybe instead of calling it "The Ultimate Force" Asus should call it "The Ultimate Flop" eh? In all seriousness though, I've done my homework and know to stay awake from the MSI Evoke (and the MECH), both the Asus TUF and STRIX cards (seriously, how much longer are they gonna recycle that design?), as well as ASROCK's Challenger. I'm more than likely going to go with Sapphire's Nitro+ 5700XT. Been using them since my HD 7790 and they've always been top-notch. It'll be good to have a triple fan card again -- haven't had one since my Tri-X 280X
I vote for Sapphire. Every AMD card I ever owned was Sapphire.
Posted on Reply
#48
R-T-B
I know the Thicc II was trash, but I've been pretty happy with my Thicc III from xfx.

Yes it idles at higher voltage. But I also have yet to crash. Makes me wonder if some vendors are too agressive with their inbios energy savings.
Posted on Reply
#49
Adam Krazispeed
lynx29I hope you are aware that Free-sync still does not work properly on Navi even 6 months after release. Reading lots of crashes on Reddit as well still a common thing after 6 months of release date. I'm leaning towards Ryzen 4800x CPU and RTX 3080 for my next PC build. Nvidia is just stable and works, sadly I am willing to pay a premium for that.
rtx 3080 will be 1000+usd too//// but

you dont need it.. freesync!

Im able to run The Division 2 @ 144FPS on my Free-sync 27" inch Gaming Panel with our issue.. just use regular V-sync, it works fine on the 5700XT (i have a reference card) but i set the monitors refresh rate in windows display settings and set refresh rate to 144hz ore 120, 75hz or what ever your comfortable with!!!

you dont really need it and this is only till AMD fixes freesync, but it works fine!

its new arch. but AMD has been releasing mass driver updates over the past month..

just last 2- weeks iv updated my Radeon Driver like 3-4 times, and havnt had really any issue> except Overclocking,
Posted on Reply
#50
bug
Adam Krazispeedrtx 3080 will be 1000+usd too//// but

you dont need it.. freesync!

Im able to run The Division 2 @ 144FPS on my Free-sync 27" inch Gaming Panel with our issue.. just use regular V-sync, it works fine on the 5700XT (i have a reference card) but i set the monitors refresh rate in windows display settings and set refresh rate to 144hz ore 120, 75hz or what ever your comfortable with!!!

you dont really need it and this is only till AMD fixes freesync, but it works fine!

its new arch. but AMD has been releasing mass driver updates over the past month..

just last 2- weeks iv updated my Radeon Driver like 3-4 times, and havnt had really any issue> except Overclocking,
Whether you realize it or not, FreeSync has little to do with the inner workings of the GPU.
Posted on Reply
Add your own comment
Apr 24th, 2024 04:10 EDT change timezone

New Forum Posts

Popular Reviews

Controversial News Posts