Thursday, May 21st 2020
AMD RDNA2 Based Radeon RX Graphics Cards Launching This September
AMD's next-generation RDNA2 architecture based Radeon RX series client-segment graphics cards will launch in September 2020, according to a DigiTimes report citing industry sources. This would make September a mighty busy month for hardware launches, as the company is also expected to debut its 4th generation Ryzen "Vermeer" (and possibly "Renoir) desktop processors in the AM4 package. NVIDIA is expected to debut its GeForce "Ampere" client-segment graphics cards around the same time. Although not in the same computing segment, Intel could also debut its 11th generation Core "Tiger Lake" mobile processors.
RDNA2 is an important launch for AMD as it's the company's first graphics architecture that meets the DirectX 12 Ultimate logo requirements, which include real-time ray-tracing capability leveraging DXR, variable rate shading, mesh shaders, and sampler feedback. AMD and NVIDIA will be debuting their graphics cards close to the release of CD Projekt's "Cyberpunk 2077," which is emerging as the year's most hotly anticipated game.
Sources:
DigiTimes, via VideoCardz
RDNA2 is an important launch for AMD as it's the company's first graphics architecture that meets the DirectX 12 Ultimate logo requirements, which include real-time ray-tracing capability leveraging DXR, variable rate shading, mesh shaders, and sampler feedback. AMD and NVIDIA will be debuting their graphics cards close to the release of CD Projekt's "Cyberpunk 2077," which is emerging as the year's most hotly anticipated game.
70 Comments on AMD RDNA2 Based Radeon RX Graphics Cards Launching This September
A simple question; will Turing be on the market for sale for 7 years time? Of course not... and thus, AMD gets a volume advantage for running the same chip on production for that many years, in that volume. They simply pay a TSMC bill, make chips, profit. No R&D involved, no new marketing, no nothing. Its a huge thing when you can just respin the same product for that long, it means revenue with zero effort. Those same guys you hired in the company to create such a chip, can now spend 7 years doing something else. Time is money,, remember that :)
And from that perspective, they also have limitless capacity at TSMC: if they can foot the TSMC bill without losing margin on their product (effectively: 'hey MS, if you want more Xboxes, above X million you will pay extra for them because TSMC and capacity is becoming scarce!') they will do it. Why do you think Apple with its super high margin on sold product has front row at TSMC? And how do you reckon Nvidia suddenly snatched capacity for its Ampere line up? Because capacity is 'limited'? Surely TSMC is working at capacity... ? Answer: Their capacity is their market. RAM mfrs are really good at this game... every time the prices drop, suddenly they magically 'lose capacity' somewhere somehow...
You have to understand the difference here with AMD doing chips for consoles, and Nvidia doing chips for 'us' too. AMD is a business supplier for consoles. Nvidia is a customer / end-user oriented company wrt Geforce. Different metrics apply. We can stop buying Geforce tomorrow. MS can't stop buying AMD chips tomorrow unless they stop selling the Xbox - and that is just the tip of the iceberg, it cascades onto every part of related business. They have agreements and contracts to uphold. Customers do not. They sign and complete the contract upon purchase of the product.
As for card shortage... yeah. There is always a shortage at launch and shortly after, its not news, its standard procedure. Shortage means one of two things: not enough product was ordered/produced/shipped, or it is massively more popular than expected. Usually its a combination of the two: scarce product inflates the price and sellers love that. Another way of saying, demand is usually estimated lower on purpose to create that scarce product. Apple is the absolute king of that game. They get their sheeple to line up and sleep at stores to snatch the rare Iphone available on launch day. Every single time.
Reality check - Nvidia is designing PC GPUs, AMD is also designing PC GPUs and ON TOP OF THAT AMD also has to design console GPUs. Console chips are no magic design time saver for AMD engineers like you're trying very hard to present. They are an additional burden on top of their normal gaming GPU line design work. Actually it gets worse, because a whole line of GPUs (like Turing or RDNA) shares a common architecture and usually differes only in configuration, but console GPUs are custom designs.
It's also not true that it is a single design that lasts 7 years. The GPUs integrated into the console chips since 2013 were in fact several architectures across multiple processes - for both Xbox and PS4:
- AMD Radeon-based "Liverpool" 28nm
- AMD Radeon-based "Liverpool" 16nm
- AMD Radeon-based "Neo" 16nm
- AMD Radeon-based "Durango" 28nm
- AMD Radeon-based "Durango 2" 16nm
- AMD Radeon-based "Scorpio Engine" 16nm
As I said before, burden. No amount of spin can twist the facts. Here are the details:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighth_generation_of_video_game_consoles So now you sunk low enough to start ignoring facts. No matter that the fab reports the capacity is fully booked for the standard 7nm node. No. Nvidia is using a custom 7nm process developed with TSMC, just like they did with 12nm Turing GPUs. Huang mentioned that in one of the GTC keynote videos from his kitchen. If you were focused, you could have noticed that Nvidia was not listed among the standard 7nm customers in that wccftech article, which you are trying to ignore. Which is why I wrote it keeps them alive. I posted that in the original response. You could have saved yourself some time if you skipped this spin attempt. Thanks for acknowledging.
www.techradar.com/news/xbox-series-x
- AMD Navi 21 (505mm2)
- AMD Navi 22 (340mm2)
- AMD Navi 23 (240mm2)
hardwareleaks.com/2020/05/23/exclusive-future-amd-gpu-stack-navi21-navi10-refresh/wccftech.com/amd-rdna-2-navi-21-gpu-radeon-rx-navi-10-refresh-graphics-cards-leaked/
And why are you so concerned about AMD's wafer supply??
You are saying AMD made a shitty deal, that they are now continuing on with a new similar shitty deal. And then create a story around it that in your mind must be true, based on random google work.
Not sure what crusade you are really on, but its not mine...
To be clear, Im not pretending to misunderstand anything. I just dont follow your logic and it is not mine. If you want to paint the picture of a burden paint away. Meanwhile AMDs financials paint the real picture.
hardwareleaks.com/2020/05/23/exclusive-future-amd-gpu-stack-navi21-navi10-refresh/
Watching the reality distortion field of AMD fans in action never gets old. Calling a wiki page with detailed technical info about 8th gen consoles "random" just because it completely disproves your argument about a single chip design for the whole 7 years of consoles? I am not suprised. But I am amused. So what you really are saying is that your arguments rely on people not googling to verify your statements? Niiice.
And so far it's only been you who posts only half of the facts and hides the inconvenient other half - like saying that AMDs console chips are easier to design and maintain than Nvidias desktop GPUs, failing to mention that AMD actually also has to design desktop GPUs, not just the console ones. Are you one of those whiny ultra-liberals that get butthurt over anything? Tough luck. Sorry, but the linked article, AMDs statements about their intended growth by Lisa Su and and their consoles are all about 7nm. Consoles were always a burden. The design costs time and money, software side costs time and money (especially when it sucks vital resources that could have been spent to actually write decent drivers for AMDs desktop GPUs - we gotta keep dreaming). And now, at the time when AMD wants to grow their market share like mad in the high margin segments, since on the CPU side they actually became competitive, they have to fulfil the console contracts with little or no margin. All that at a time when TSMC 7nm capacity is fully booked.
I just don't get your need to describe people in a tech forum, sounds like whining to me. Well unless you're trying to hook up. Still, you can't give us any link that suggests so. Repeating yourself doesn't make it any more true.
The link wasn't for your reply, read again. TSMC being fully bookerd doesn't prove anything, you're making things up.
We're done here.