Sunday, January 20th 2008

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 Benchmarked

German hardware site PCGH had the opportunity to benchmark the upcoming Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 processor through various performance benchmarks. The 45nm Core 2 Quad Q9300 CPU is yet to be relased and features 2,5GHz (333x7.5) clock speed, 6MB L2 shared cache and only 1.2V default voltage. See all the tests here.

Source: PCGH
Add your own comment

31 Comments on Intel Core 2 Quad Q9300 Benchmarked

#1
hat
Enthusiast
Wait, so these 45nm chips are hyperthreaded? Are they "true" quads too?
Posted on Reply
#2
vega22
i thought we all use a comma to seperate every thousand???

3,000,000,000,000,000so on and so......

i think the pic has been edited in some form or other because if you look at each line it is as if there are a few pixles missing of the bottom of the text.

man i want a q9300 now tho :P

edit

rhythmeister said:
We use full stops here :laugh:
pmslmao
Posted on Reply
#3
Morgoth
kwchang007 said:
Uh I thought they were bringing back hyperthreading with nehlam, not penryn.
yes only Nehalem Architect and sandybridge architect and the newer versions posible

hat said:
Wait, so these 45nm chips are hyperthreaded? Are they "true" quads too?
Only Nehalem architect and Sandybridge architect and the newer versions posible

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nehalem_%28CPU_architecture%29
Posted on Reply
#4
Tatty_One
Super Moderator
Looks nice at the price it's supposed to be, cant quite see the point of comparing it with loads of other CPU's in those benches that are clocked lower apart from the AMD comparisons of course, thing is, with a 7.5 multi it aint gonna go much faster than that 3.5Gig which means that a 65nm Kentsfield will better it in most cases (providing it's price competative).....I do think the 9450 is going to be the one to get!..............:respect:
Posted on Reply
#5
phanbuey
marsey99 said:
i thought we all use a comma to seperate every thousand???

3,000,000,000,000,000so on and so......

i think the pic has been edited in some form or other because if you look at each line it is as if there are a few pixles missing of the bottom of the text.
DUDE, as many above posts have said,... in europe they write 3,000.00 as 3.000,00 check your windows language settings and u'll see... there is nothing being cut off, trust me.

anyways, a quad at 3.5 GHz with gobs of cache is gonna be tough to beat... but then again, i dont think AMD is going anywhere, and once the phenom bugs are out theyre gonna be nice, cheap quadcores.
Posted on Reply
#6
Ser-J
erocker said:
What's the point?! Who cares!
I was just about to say that
Posted on Reply