Mullered07's Everest Memory Benchmark Thread

[infrared]

Here's mine from a couple of weeks ago when I was finding my max OC's. CPU-Z's are 24/7 speeds:

Gotta love AMD's memory controller

Holy crap *rubs eyes*... it's not possible.. is it? Wow

How much voltage are you running through those sticks?

 

[oli_ramsay]

Ayone know why my latency is so high?
Results dont seem that gereat compared to other peoples.

Could be performance level, which is the latency of the northbridge. I think it's called TRP is BIOS. It's called TRFC on mine. Try lowering as many ram timings as you can in BIOS too.

 

[Jmatt110]

Holy crap *rubs eyes*... it's not possible.. is it? Wow

How much voltage are you running through those sticks?

Stock is 2.1v, I'm running 2.18v through them

Also I haven't found may MAX stable OC for anything yet, been too busy with school lately, so I know I can get more out of my system. Holidays are coming up though...

 

[Arctucas]

Here is a better benchmark:

 

[Jmatt110]

Here is a better benchmark:

Better than what?

 

[Arctucas]

Better than the first one I posted (Post #18).

I see, you thought I was saying it was better than yours? I should have been more specific. I was not comparing mine to anyone other than my own.

And what is with the thumbs down?

 

[mullered07]

ok no fighting in my thread ...........

updated guys, thanks for keeping them coming (i think cause its a pita editing and inputing them the way i am lol)

maybe sticky if we get enough people ?

 

[Arctucas]

ok no fighting in my thread ...........

updated guys, thanks for keeping them coming (i think cause its a pita editing and inputing them the way i am lol)

maybe sticky if we get enough people ?

No problems here.

Would it be preferable to edit my post with a better benchmark, or post a new one?

 

[mullered07]

Would it be preferable to edit my post with a better benchmark, or post a new one?

well a new post is preferrable as i always check new posts, and hardly go trawling through older ones, i might update the rules and just state that each post/screenshot must be also shown with the posters name and readings EG:

mullered07|8907|7609|6503|59.7

that looks like it would make my job a hell of a lot easier as at the moment i have 2 of the same windows open, one for manually copying the results and the other for editing the first thread. which results in a lot of switching tabs to read and type etc, where as read and copy/paste would be easier.

good question you raised though as i have been thinking about that recently, though at the moment i can cope with the amount of benchmarks people have been posting(im hoping for more guys, so c'mon) also if you like/appreciate the thread a thanks would be nice

 

[Jmatt110]

Better than the first one I posted (Post #18).

I see, you thought I was saying it was better than yours? I should have been more specific. I was not comparing mine to anyone other than my own.

And what is with the thumbs down?

Sorry that was my bad, I thought with the thumbs down and that infrared seemed a bit suprised at my score that you were being arrogant and trying to show off lol. Sorry, misinterpreted.

 

[Arctucas]

No problem, it was my fault for not stating that I was referring to own previous benchmark.

 

[infrared]

I can't believe we havn't seen any DDR3 yet.

 

[mon74]

Here's mine, still on the 939/ddr bandwagon...

I can manage ddr500/T2, but my pc feels snappier at ddr466/T1, K8's just love tight timings.

 

[sneekypeet]

Here's mine, still on the 939/ddr bandwagon...

I can manage ddr500/T2, but my pc feels snappier at ddr466/T1, K8's just love tight timings.

Have you tried 3-3-3-8 with a bit more voltage? That seemed to be what I had the best sucess at! also that latency # seems a bit high????

 

[mon74]

Have you tried 3-3-3-8 with a bit more voltage? That seemed to be what I had the best sucess at! also that latency # seems a bit high????

I have sneekypeet, i think my mobo it's at fault here, the cpu volts hoover from 1.400 to 1.432, sometimes up to 1.440, mind you, i have it set to 1.42 in the bios...

 

[Arctucas]

Arctucas
Read 11455
Write 8522
Copy 7951
Latency 46.0



A small improvement on my last effort:

 

[Jmatt110]

All right been playing around a bit more, here's where I'm at so far.

Jmatt110
Read 11006
Write 9936
Copy 11669
Latency 36.1

 

[mullered07]

OK THIS THREAD IS BEING REVIVED BY ME,

Front page has been redone and now the results are in an easy to read table (thanks W1zz)

ive also made it as easy as possible to submit results, that will enable me to update in a matter of seconds, so what are we waiting lets get benching

 

[CrAsHnBuRnXp]

Here's mine. Think I can improve upon it? If so how?




Edit: Damn... thats hard to see. Ill see if i cant fix it.

Edit 2:

CrAsHnBuRnXp|7867mb/s|9973mb/s|8413mb/s|67.9ns

 

[mullered07]

Here's mine. Think I can improve upon it? If so how?

make the picture bigger so we can read it, that would be an improvment

 

[CrAsHnBuRnXp]

make the picture bigger so we can read it, that would be an improvment

Working on that....

Any other time it works...

Edit: Fixed!

 

[mullered07]

have you tried running at 4.4.4.12 at them speeds, maybe try upto 2.2v to get them stable

 

[pbmaster]

What do you guys think?

 

[CrAsHnBuRnXp]

have you tried running at 4.4.4.12 at them speeds, maybe try upto 2.2v to get them stable

Wont happen. Doestn boot. Even at 2.3v

 

[vega22]

marsey99
Read 9412
Write 10596
Copy 9010
Latency 54.2