Well, thanks for actually doing some research -- you look a lot less like a troll when you actually provide sources.
I skimmed through that report, trying to look for the points you made, and I found a few issues:
1) True -- illegal aliens, if they are included in this figure of ~47 million, shouldn't be included. However, I couldn't find any evidence of this in the report you linked -- do you remember where you found it?
I searched the report for the words "illegal," "migrant," "undocumented" -- nothing was returned. I hope you're not insinuating that the totals in the "hispanic" column should be considered as such, because that would be disingenuous, even for you.
Even so, since there's no way to know exactly how many illegals there are in America (even if they were included in this figure) -- could be 20 million, could be 5 million, who knows -- it's not as relevant as some would like to think.
2) I don't see how someone
choosing not to buy health insurance shouldn't be included in this report -- to me, it doesn't matter. Accidents happen to everyone, and if they're not covered by a healthcare plan, they're going to go in debt (if they're able to get long term treatment at all). Besides, depending upon where you live in the US, $50k a year might be just barely enough to get by, especially if you have a family.
3) People who are changing from one healthcare plan to another? Yeah, for whatever reason, they should be considered not covered during that time. Accidents happen, and it doesn't matter if you're "in between" health care plans -- if it happens to you, you're screwed. And if the lapse in coverage is a year or more (what it would have to be for them to be included in the total figure), well when that's just looks sad (as far as the wonderfulness of a "free-market" system goes). A NHS system would make sure this never happened.
4) This point needs a bit of clarification as well -- where in the report did you find that these people were included, and how many of them were there? I find it strange that someone would have free coverage available, and wouldn't take it...
And please stop bringing up HSA's or MSA's. Creating "tax free savings accounts" to pay for ridiculously expensive healthcare doesn't mean much to the vast majority of uninsured folks in the US, who
don't have the extra money to begin with. They probably weren't included because in a runaway heathcare system like in America, this kind of patchwork fix is almost laughable.
I suspect that Congress limiting the amount of these that could be created had more to do with limiting the amount of tax-free havens for wealthy folks to stash money away in, don't you think?