- Joined
- May 27, 2005
- Messages
- 3,651 (0.53/day)
- Location
- Little Rock Arkansas, United States
System Name | Monolith |
---|---|
Processor | Intel Xeon E3110 Wolfdale@3.5GHz |
Motherboard | MSI P35-Neo |
Cooling | Active Air |
Memory | 4GB DDR2 800 |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire HD 3850 512MB PCI-E |
Storage | 1 x 80GB Internal, 1 x 250GB Internal, 1 x 40GB External |
Display(s) | Acer X203w |
Case | Generic black case with locking front bezel |
Audio Device(s) | Creative SB Audigy 2 ZS |
Power Supply | 500 Watt Seasonic M12 |
Software | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 |
unless you have a specific reason not to go with canon or nikon, go with canon or nikon. you will learn how to properly use their cams over time and when you decide to upgrade to a better cam (which will most probably be canon or nikon) there is less of a learning curve
I agree, I love my Sony, but I only got it over the Cannon and Nikon because it is compatible with some older Minolta lenses that I have. In retrospect, I wish I had just sold those lenses and gone with a Nikon or Cannon; they simply have the best cameras in my opinion.
price is the thing thats stopping me from going canon.
another reason is the use of a rechargable battery in sony rather than having to buy and replace AA batteries.
I know that some Nikon Coolpix come with a rechargeable Li+ battery, and so do some of the Cannon Powershots. Both of those versions of the camera are less than $150 new.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16830120254
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16830113091
Last edited: