• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Phenom II vs Core2Quad "Video encode etc" Performance?

Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
7,704 (1.21/day)
System Name Back to Blue
Processor i9 14900k
Motherboard Asrock Z790 Nova
Cooling Corsair H150i Elite
Memory 64GB Corsair Dominator DDR5-6400 @ 6600
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 Ultra FTW3
Storage 4TB WD 850x NVME, 4TB WD Black, 10TB Seagate Barracuda Pro
Display(s) 1x Samsung Odyssey G7 Neo and 1x Dell u2518d
Case Lian Li o11 DXL w/custom vented front panel
Audio Device(s) Focusrite Saffire PRO 14 -> DBX DriveRack PA+ -> Mackie MR8 and MR10 / Senn PX38X -> SB AE-5 Plus
Power Supply Corsair RM1000i
Mouse Logitech G502x
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 11 x64 Pro
Benchmark Scores 31k multicore Cinebench - CPU limited 125w
Anyone found or seen any benchmarks in video encoding etc type of work between the Q9k's and Phenom 2's?

I know the I7 will completely rip them both apart.
 

Blacksniper87

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
134 (0.02/day)
Location
Rockhampton, Australia
Processor E8400 @ 3.00 GHZ
Motherboard Asus P5K/EPU
Cooling Stock Heatsink
Memory 4gb in 2x 2 GB 1066 MHZ Corsair Dominators
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 280
Storage 2 x Seagate 500 GB
Display(s) Samsung 275t
Case Coolermaster Stacker 830
Audio Device(s) Razor Barracuda
Power Supply Unknown
Software Vista Ultimate x64
nah i havent seen anything however you could try gogling it no offense or anything, part from that you could just look at the Q 9*** benchmarks and compare to a seperate benchie of the new X4's
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
8,519 (1.43/day)
Location
Kansas City
System Name The Dove Box Rev 3.0
Processor i7 8700k @ 4.7GHz
Motherboard Asus Maximus X APEX
Cooling Custom water loop
Memory 16GB 3600 MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) 2x MSI 780 Ti's in SLI
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 PCIe SSD, 4TB
Display(s) 27" Asus 144Hz
Case Enermax Fulmo GT
Audio Device(s) ON BOARD FTW
Power Supply Corsair 1200W
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Win 10 64x
I think the Quad 9 series with the 12MB L2 cache would take a PII. I dont have any benchmarks to source though.

The Q9400 may drop out with half of the 9450's cache so the advantage should be PII.
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2007
Messages
8,519 (1.43/day)
Location
Kansas City
System Name The Dove Box Rev 3.0
Processor i7 8700k @ 4.7GHz
Motherboard Asus Maximus X APEX
Cooling Custom water loop
Memory 16GB 3600 MHz DDR4
Video Card(s) 2x MSI 780 Ti's in SLI
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 PCIe SSD, 4TB
Display(s) 27" Asus 144Hz
Case Enermax Fulmo GT
Audio Device(s) ON BOARD FTW
Power Supply Corsair 1200W
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Win 10 64x

3dsage

New Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2008
Messages
1,797 (0.32/day)
Location
NW Burbs of Chicago
System Name *5GHZ_STAR*
Processor Core i5 2500K 5GHZ 24/7 1.38Vcore
Motherboard Asrock P67 Extreme6
Cooling Scythe SCMG-2100 REV. B
Memory 2x2GB GSkill Ripjaw X 1600 CL7
Video Card(s) 4850 XFIRE
Storage 500GB + 1TB NAS
Display(s) I-INC 28" LCD 1920x1200
Case Antec P180
Power Supply Thermaltake TR2 TRX-650
Software Seven Ultimate 64-bit
Anyone found or seen any benchmarks in video encoding etc type of work between the Q9k's and Phenom 2's?

I know the I7 will completely rip them both apart.


I gave the x264 HD benchmark a go, I have 720BE @ 3.8 on x4 cores, basically a
940@3.8.

My 720BE @ 3.8GHZ
Results for x264.exe v0.58.747
encoded 1442 frames, 81.70 fps, 3905.42 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 80.80 fps, 3905.42 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 81.34 fps, 3905.42 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 81.39 fps, 3905.42 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.54 fps, 3952.85 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.50 fps, 3952.85 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.43 fps, 3952.85 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.25 fps, 3952.85 kb/s



Q9450 @ 8x425 3.4GHZ
Results for x264.exe v0.58.747
encoded 1442 frames, 73.42 fps, 3904.67 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 73.59 fps, 3904.67 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 73.01 fps, 3904.67 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 74.01 fps, 3904.67 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.47 fps, 3952.97 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.47 fps, 3952.97 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.45 fps, 3952.97 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.42 fps, 3952.97 kb/s

Heres some more results
http://forums.anandtech.com/messageview.aspx
http://forums.techarp.com/reviews-articles/23859-x264-hd-benchmark.html

Link to benchmark
http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=520#data
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,682 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
But wait!! a ATI GPU will dominate them both to the point of being utter putrid waste. So it is a moot point.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,682 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Results for x264.exe v0.58.747
encoded 1442 frames, 80.57 fps, 3905.42 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 80.75 fps, 3905.42 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 81.05 fps, 3905.42 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 80.91 fps, 3905.42 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.67 fps, 3952.85 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.64 fps, 3952.85 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.67 fps, 3952.85 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.54 fps, 3952.85 kb/s


Meh haps on the card if i can get it to work in Win7 X64.
 

1Kurgan1

The Knife in your Back
Joined
Dec 8, 2008
Messages
10,421 (1.86/day)
Location
Duluth, Minnesota
System Name My Comp | Fiancees Comp
Processor i7 5820k @ 4.6Ghz 1.285v| i5 2500k
Motherboard MSI x99 SLI Plus | AsRock Z77 Pro 3
Cooling Watercooled
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400 @ 2666 | 12GB DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) AMD R9 290x | MSI 5850 OC
Storage 128gb SSD + 2x 2TB | 2TB
Display(s) Asus 27" LCD | 25" Hanns G
Case CM Storm | CM Elite 430
Audio Device(s) Creative Recon 3D PCIe
Power Supply Enermax Galaxy 1250W | Rosewill 630w
Mouse Logitech G700s | Logitech G100s
Keyboard Logitech G901 | Logitech G105
Software Win 8.1 Ultimate x64 | Win 8.1 Ultimate x64
Benchmark Scores 3D Mark - Fire Strike Extreme - 4403
Try turning down the 720 to 3.4ghz and running that test, a 400mhz advantage skews the test
 

Blacksniper87

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
134 (0.02/day)
Location
Rockhampton, Australia
Processor E8400 @ 3.00 GHZ
Motherboard Asus P5K/EPU
Cooling Stock Heatsink
Memory 4gb in 2x 2 GB 1066 MHZ Corsair Dominators
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 280
Storage 2 x Seagate 500 GB
Display(s) Samsung 275t
Case Coolermaster Stacker 830
Audio Device(s) Razor Barracuda
Power Supply Unknown
Software Vista Ultimate x64
yeah i recken your right clock them the same and run the benchmark again, i recken it will be pretty much neck and neck. And finally amd has a product of around the same performance of the intels core 2's damn it took them long enough. Now all they have to do is beat i7 LOL
 

Ketxxx

Heedless Psychic
Joined
Mar 4, 2006
Messages
11,521 (1.74/day)
Location
Kingdom of gods
System Name Ravens Talon
Processor AMD R7 3700X @ 4.4GHz 1.3v
Motherboard MSI X570 Tomahawk
Cooling Modded 240mm Coolermaster Liquidmaster
Memory 2x16GB Klevv BoltX 3600MHz & custom timings
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6800XT Red Devil
Storage 250GB Asgard SSD, 1TB Integral SSD, 2TB Seagate Barracuda
Display(s) 27" BenQ Mobiuz
Case NZXT Phantom 530
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX 7.1 PCI-E
Power Supply 1000w Supernova
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores Fast. I don't need epeen.
Yep clock the Phen 2 down or the Q up. I'd say with the Q clocked up it would edge out the Phen 2. Any C2D or Q gets huge improvements with a high FSB.
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
7,704 (1.21/day)
System Name Back to Blue
Processor i9 14900k
Motherboard Asrock Z790 Nova
Cooling Corsair H150i Elite
Memory 64GB Corsair Dominator DDR5-6400 @ 6600
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 Ultra FTW3
Storage 4TB WD 850x NVME, 4TB WD Black, 10TB Seagate Barracuda Pro
Display(s) 1x Samsung Odyssey G7 Neo and 1x Dell u2518d
Case Lian Li o11 DXL w/custom vented front panel
Audio Device(s) Focusrite Saffire PRO 14 -> DBX DriveRack PA+ -> Mackie MR8 and MR10 / Senn PX38X -> SB AE-5 Plus
Power Supply Corsair RM1000i
Mouse Logitech G502x
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 11 x64 Pro
Benchmark Scores 31k multicore Cinebench - CPU limited 125w
Ya from the looks of that it would be a pretty close run..

As for the ATI card, good luck finding software worth anything that uses it...
PS- ATI video encoder is TRASH and doesn't even use my card.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
7,197 (1.12/day)
System Name ICE-QUAD // ICE-CRUNCH
Processor Q6600 // 2x Xeon 5472
Memory 2GB DDR // 8GB FB-DIMM
Video Card(s) HD3850-AGP // FireGL 3400
Display(s) 2 x Samsung 204Ts = 3200x1200
Audio Device(s) Audigy 2
Software Windows Server 2003 R2 as a Workstation now migrated to W10 with regrets.
Last edited:

3dsage

New Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2008
Messages
1,797 (0.32/day)
Location
NW Burbs of Chicago
System Name *5GHZ_STAR*
Processor Core i5 2500K 5GHZ 24/7 1.38Vcore
Motherboard Asrock P67 Extreme6
Cooling Scythe SCMG-2100 REV. B
Memory 2x2GB GSkill Ripjaw X 1600 CL7
Video Card(s) 4850 XFIRE
Storage 500GB + 1TB NAS
Display(s) I-INC 28" LCD 1920x1200
Case Antec P180
Power Supply Thermaltake TR2 TRX-650
Software Seven Ultimate 64-bit
Try turning down the 720 to 3.4ghz and running that test, a 400mhz advantage skews the test


Here you go guys:)
720B.E @ 3.4GHZ
Results for x264.exe v0.58.747
encoded 1442 frames, 68.07 fps, 3905.42 kb/s ( IDK what happend here)
encoded 1442 frames, 74.97 fps, 3905.42 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 75.15 fps, 3904.67 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 74.66 fps, 3905.42 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 18.45 fps, 3952.85 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 18.49 fps, 3952.85 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 18.58 fps, 3953.23 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 18.30 fps, 3952.85 kb/s



Q9450 @ 8x425 3.4GHZ
Results for x264.exe v0.58.747
encoded 1442 frames, 73.42 fps, 3904.67 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 73.59 fps, 3904.67 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 73.01 fps, 3904.67 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 74.01 fps, 3904.67 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.47 fps, 3952.97 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.47 fps, 3952.97 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.45 fps, 3952.97 kb/s
encoded 1442 frames, 20.42 fps, 3952.97 kb/s


The C2Q ram was running at 1066, and the PII at 800. Dont know if that makes a diff.
 
Last edited:
Top