• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

NVIDIA GeForce 4XX Series Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
3,638 (0.63/day)
Location
California
Why do all people want new cards anyway? To play Dirt 2 in DX11 mode that looks 5% better than in DX10 mode?

Oh and 3DMark DX11 benchmark still haven't out yet!
 
Last edited:

crazyeyesreaper

Not a Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
9,753 (1.78/day)
Location
04578
System Name Old reliable
Processor Intel 8700K @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling Custom Water
Memory 32 GB Crucial Ballistix 3666 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X
Storage 3x SSDs 2x HDDs
Display(s) Dell U2412M + Samsung TA350
Case Thermaltake Core P3 TG
Audio Device(s) Samson Meteor Mic / Generic 2.1 / KRK KNS 6400 headset
Power Supply Zalman EBT-1000
Mouse Mionix NAOS 7000
Keyboard Mionix
3dmark there so last year now its all about Unigine Heaven Bench screw 3dmark
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,655 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
For a guy with a i7 at 3.8Ghz, and waiting on new GPU's you sure seem staunch in your love for the green F you in the A team. Perhaps people like me have been waiting for a card that can run GTA4 and the whole next series of games at good resolutions?


I have been buying either top of the line cards, or close to and modding them for a few years now so I can get good performance for my dollar. And without some strong competition from NV ATI will not have to do anything about pricing, or releasing newer models. We all need that. So for NV to fail now is actually bad for me as a ATI customer.


I really do want these cards out, and to perform well. But the length to which so many people here will go to try and polish this turd is amazing.
 
Joined
Jul 2, 2008
Messages
3,638 (0.63/day)
Location
California
I don't have GTA4 for PC, so I have no idea how terrible it is on PC :laugh:, I got that for my PS3 though. The last ATI card that I bought was HD2600, and that wasn't for me, lmao.

Anyway, I'm quite a loyal customer for Nvidia's products, because most of my games are TWIMTBP titles (Battlefield, COD, Company of Heroes, Warhammer series, ect..) And I'm not going to AMD/ATI's threads and bashing on unreleased products, I simple have no interests in AMD VGA cards (except their integrated GPUs).

I do have interest in AMD cpu, but AMD failed me with their Phenom 1 which I bought years ago. Suck for them that when Phenom II is out I already got i7, but I did not regret buying i7, totally glad I made that move.

AMD released their HD5000 series too early imo, it was barely 6 months for HD4000. I think that's abusing customers, if consoles were making this way it will be hell for all of us :laugh:.

I will hold my breath for Fermi, I'm looking forward to Bad Company 2 (with DX11 support) this March, and $500 that I put aside since Christmas for Fermi. AMD will need to do more with AMD games and their driver optimization/custom profiles before they can make me move camp.

I don't expect the single GPU Fermi will be faster than Dual-GPUs DX11 card from AMD, I'm expecting it to be at least equal or faster than GTX295. It should puts the card under AMD Flagship card's price, and I will be happy to get one.

Fermi will be hot? Who care!? As long as it run! My 8800GT idle at 70C with stock cooler last summer, and it didn't die, and so was my GTX280.

Fermi will be 40nm, what's the next node after 40nm? Probably 32nm half-node which is 28nm, and AMD probably will go ahead with its 28nm before NVIDIA. It's the pattern. 90nm vs 65nm, 65nm vs 55nm, 40nm vs 28nm, NVIDIA vs AMD.

For now, I will hold my judgement, once it's out and if it turn out to be bad, then I always have AMD to turn to, and that's when the price will be better than now anyway.
 

shevanel

New Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
3,464 (0.65/day)
Location
Leesburg, FL
u need to take that $500 and buy an air conditioner LOL

j/k. there is nothing wrong with sticking to brands you like.
 

bobzilla2009

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
455 (0.09/day)
System Name Bobzilla the second
Processor AMD Phenom II 940
Motherboard Asus M3A76-CM
Cooling 3*120mm case fans
Memory 4GB 1066GHz DDR2 Kingston HyperX
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon HD5870 1GB
Storage Seagate 7200RPM 500GB
Display(s) samsung T220HD
Case Guardian 921
Power Supply OCZ MODXSTREAM Pro 700w (2*25A 12v rail)
Software Windows 7 Beta
Benchmark Scores 19753 3dmark06 15826 3dmark vantage 38.4Fps crysis benchmarking tool (1680x1050, 4xAA)
If i'm not mistaken, the next battlefields (bfbc2 and bf3) will not be twimtbp, but will be AMD products. The disadvantage for nvidia is that most of the developers who have started using dx11 (i.e. the ones likely to end up being good at using it) are all amd supporters now. Although i'm sure they could try a microsoft and buy them all back ^^ (although i would presume the nvidia coffers aren't quite as full at the moment due to the delayed fermi and the relative lack of sales in their other cards (steam hardware survey has been showing a month upon month decrease in nvidia compared to ATi for example).

Also i do agree that fermi reaching gtx295 levels would be just fine, we've only started bitching about the hd5870 because we're bored now ^^. It would also lead to some nice pricing warfare!
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
9,019 (1.47/day)
System Name Black Panther
Processor i9 9900k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO Wifi 1.0
Cooling NZXT Kraken X72 360mm
Memory 2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4 3600Mhz
Video Card(s) Palit RTX2080 Ti Dual 11GB DDR6
Storage Samsung EVO 970 500GB SSD M.2 & 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200rpm
Display(s) 32'' Gigabyte G32QC 2560x1440 165Hz
Case NZXT H710i Black
Audio Device(s) Razer Electra V2 & Z5500 Speakers
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850 Gold 80+
Mouse Some Corsair lost the box forgot the model
Keyboard Motospeed
Software Windows 10
Fermi will go into production starting in the 3rd week of February, and be available in "low quantities" starting mid-march.

According to our source, Fermi's yield will be low but not any worst than what AMD/ATI is experiencing. TSMC, the company producing Radeon HD 5800 series at 40nm, is "happy at 4-percent yield," said our source.

Tom's Hardware.
 

bobzilla2009

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
455 (0.09/day)
System Name Bobzilla the second
Processor AMD Phenom II 940
Motherboard Asus M3A76-CM
Cooling 3*120mm case fans
Memory 4GB 1066GHz DDR2 Kingston HyperX
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon HD5870 1GB
Storage Seagate 7200RPM 500GB
Display(s) samsung T220HD
Case Guardian 921
Power Supply OCZ MODXSTREAM Pro 700w (2*25A 12v rail)
Software Windows 7 Beta
Benchmark Scores 19753 3dmark06 15826 3dmark vantage 38.4Fps crysis benchmarking tool (1680x1050, 4xAA)
happy at 4%!!!! surely a typo of 40% at least. Also that means when fermis do get here, no-one will be able to find any in stores for a few months. But if the statements are true, i'm assuming TSMC are going to be ditch for the next generation. Aren't AMD working with GlobalFoundries anyway?

EDIT: AMD have owned GF since march last year, lol, so i'm assuming that's where the radeon hd6xxx series is coming from.
 

TheMailMan78

Big Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,599 (3.68/day)
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
AMD released their HD5000 series too early imo, it was barely 6 months for HD4000. I think that's abusing customers, if consoles were making this way it will be hell for all of us :laugh:
The 4800 series were out for over a year before the 5800 series my friend. You are thinking of an Nivida re-brand.
 

bobzilla2009

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
455 (0.09/day)
System Name Bobzilla the second
Processor AMD Phenom II 940
Motherboard Asus M3A76-CM
Cooling 3*120mm case fans
Memory 4GB 1066GHz DDR2 Kingston HyperX
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon HD5870 1GB
Storage Seagate 7200RPM 500GB
Display(s) samsung T220HD
Case Guardian 921
Power Supply OCZ MODXSTREAM Pro 700w (2*25A 12v rail)
Software Windows 7 Beta
Benchmark Scores 19753 3dmark06 15826 3dmark vantage 38.4Fps crysis benchmarking tool (1680x1050, 4xAA)
the last hd4xxx came out only 6 months before though, but i don't think that should really count as the generation lifespan. Personally i take the lifespan as being 4870 to 5870, and i also see the performance improvements as such. People seem iffy with the hd5870 because they are comparing it to the 4890. In the end they have different architectures, so comparing a card higher up in the last generation relative to the hd5870's position in the new series is a bit off (even if the specs seem that way).

It's like people will be comparing the gtx380 to the gtx285 instead of the 280 (although there isn't much in the way of difference). Or more likely the hd5870, so the impact of fermi will be lessened, even if it is good. Still, fermi should beat the hd5870, and even if it doesn't beat hemlock, it's a good improvement considering the scaling problems of dx9 games (the primary source of all our complaints about lack of improvement in this generation, is the fact the games aren't good enough).
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2006
Messages
5,147 (0.78/day)
Location
AZ
System Name Thought I'd be done with this by now
Processor i7 11700k 8/16
Motherboard MSI Z590 Pro Wifi
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4, 9x aigo AR12
Memory 32GB GSkill TridentZ Neo DDR4-4000 CL18-22-22-42
Video Card(s) MSI Ventus 2x Geforce RTX 3070
Storage 1TB MX300 M.2 OS + Games, + cloud mostly
Display(s) Samsung 40" 4k (TV)
Case Lian Li PC-011 Dynamic EVO Black
Audio Device(s) onboard HD -> Yamaha 5.1
Power Supply EVGA 850 GQ
Mouse Logitech wireless
Keyboard same
VR HMD nah
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores no one cares anymore lols
AMD released their HD5000 series too early imo, it was barely 6 months for HD4000. I think that's abusing customers, if consoles were making this way it will be hell for all of us :laugh:.

fail 15 months, in fact the 5000 series was overdue.
4800's launched in June of 2008
5800's launched in september of 2009.

the GTX 260 and GTX 280 also launched in June of 2008 nvidia will not have relased new tech for 2 years by the time fermi launches. This from the company that used to have 6 month product cycles.
 

crazyeyesreaper

Not a Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
9,753 (1.78/day)
Location
04578
System Name Old reliable
Processor Intel 8700K @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard MSI Z370 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling Custom Water
Memory 32 GB Crucial Ballistix 3666 MHz
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Ti Gaming X
Storage 3x SSDs 2x HDDs
Display(s) Dell U2412M + Samsung TA350
Case Thermaltake Core P3 TG
Audio Device(s) Samson Meteor Mic / Generic 2.1 / KRK KNS 6400 headset
Power Supply Zalman EBT-1000
Mouse Mionix NAOS 7000
Keyboard Mionix
why have 6 month cycles when u can just rename and accomplish the same thing :roll:
 

bobzilla2009

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
455 (0.09/day)
System Name Bobzilla the second
Processor AMD Phenom II 940
Motherboard Asus M3A76-CM
Cooling 3*120mm case fans
Memory 4GB 1066GHz DDR2 Kingston HyperX
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon HD5870 1GB
Storage Seagate 7200RPM 500GB
Display(s) samsung T220HD
Case Guardian 921
Power Supply OCZ MODXSTREAM Pro 700w (2*25A 12v rail)
Software Windows 7 Beta
Benchmark Scores 19753 3dmark06 15826 3dmark vantage 38.4Fps crysis benchmarking tool (1680x1050, 4xAA)
indeed, you still get the same amount of sales from idiots :)
 

Bo_Fox

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
480 (0.09/day)
Location
Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
System Name Flame Vortec Fatal1ty (rig1), UV Tourmaline Confexia (rig2)
Processor 2 x Core i7's 4+Gigahertzzies
Motherboard BL00DR4G3 and DFI UT-X58 T3eH8
Cooling Thermalright IFX-14 (better than TRUE) 2x push-push, Customized TT Big Typhoon
Memory 6GB OCZ DDR3-1600 CAS7-7-7-1T, 6GB for 2nd rig
Video Card(s) 8800GTX for "free" S3D (mtbs3d.com), 4870 1GB, HDTV Wonder (DRM-free)
Storage WD RE3 1TB, Caviar Black 1TB 7.2k, 500GB 7.2k, Raptor X 10k
Display(s) Sony GDM-FW900 24" CRT oc'ed to 2560x1600@68Hz, Dell 2405FPW 24" PVA (HDCP-free)
Case custom gutted-out painted black case, silver UV case, lots of aesthetics-souped stuff
Audio Device(s) Sonar X-Fi MB, Bernstein audio riser.. what??
Power Supply OCZ Fatal1ty 700W, Iceberg 680W, Fortron Booster X3 300W for GPU
Software 2 partitions WinXP-32 on 2 drives per rig, 2 of Vista64 on 2 drives per rig
Benchmark Scores 5.9 Vista Experience Index... yay!!! What??? :)
If i'm not mistaken, the next battlefields (bfbc2 and bf3) will not be twimtbp, but will be AMD products. The disadvantage for nvidia is that most of the developers who have started using dx11 (i.e. the ones likely the end up being good at using it) are all amd supporters now. Although i'm sure they could try a microsoft and buy them all back ^^ (although i would presume the nvidia coffers aren't quite as full at the moment due to the delayed fermi and the relative lack of sales in their other cards (steam hardware survey has been showing a month upon month decrease in nvidia compared to ATi for example).

Also i do agree that fermi reaching gtx295 levels would be just fine, we've only started bitching about the hd5870 because we're bored now ^^. It would also lead to some nice pricing warfare!

That's music to my ears!

I have to disagree. The 295 first and 2nd gen were both shorter than the 4870x2. NV has a way with design.

Hmm, I would have a hard time agreeing with that. It took NV forever to figure out how to make a single-PCB revision of a dual-GPU card, after the 7900GX2, 7950GX2, 9800GX2.

Please, don't even start with that sort of a debate where the debate isn't necessary. There are tests and benchmarks that use the whole lot of resources the card can offer and both cards match each other +/- 1%.

This is not to say ATI is evil or NV is smarter... it's just how it is. The 5870 looked better in my case. It doesn't rattle like a 5850 can with higher fan speeds, but honestly the 5850 is the only card they released. There are 2 "higher performance" cards that are the same thing with different clock speeds, or a whole other GPU to back it up.

The point is that there happens to be one awesome card ATI has made (5850) and the rest are ROP starved. I doubt the NV solution will be ROP starved with 48 ROPs, and just about every other spec the card carries is more than the 5XXX series cards. This, to me, means that it may very well double performance of the 285. I highly HIGHLY count on it even. ATI's 4XXX series was a huge improvement, but there were scaling issues that were shown to be ROP related. NV's cards scaled just fine with how many shaders they had activated. The 295 scaled in relation to 280s in SLI. The headroom in spec gives them the ability to make cards that are actually higher performance than their own, more mainstream, cards.

A 4890 still managed to show large performance improvements over a 4870, even though it still had only 16 ROP's. I have yet to see a game that really suffered from the ROP bottleneck on the 4890!

At least the ROP's are doubled on the 5870 over a 4890, unlike the Fermi which looks like it will have more than 2x the shaders, but with only 50% more ROP's than a GTX 285.

The 5870 was bottlenecked by the memory much more than the ROP's. At least the Fermi will probably have 50% more bandwidth than the 285-- a nice balance in the increase of both ROP's and bandwidth.
 
Last edited:

Bo_Fox

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
480 (0.09/day)
Location
Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
System Name Flame Vortec Fatal1ty (rig1), UV Tourmaline Confexia (rig2)
Processor 2 x Core i7's 4+Gigahertzzies
Motherboard BL00DR4G3 and DFI UT-X58 T3eH8
Cooling Thermalright IFX-14 (better than TRUE) 2x push-push, Customized TT Big Typhoon
Memory 6GB OCZ DDR3-1600 CAS7-7-7-1T, 6GB for 2nd rig
Video Card(s) 8800GTX for "free" S3D (mtbs3d.com), 4870 1GB, HDTV Wonder (DRM-free)
Storage WD RE3 1TB, Caviar Black 1TB 7.2k, 500GB 7.2k, Raptor X 10k
Display(s) Sony GDM-FW900 24" CRT oc'ed to 2560x1600@68Hz, Dell 2405FPW 24" PVA (HDCP-free)
Case custom gutted-out painted black case, silver UV case, lots of aesthetics-souped stuff
Audio Device(s) Sonar X-Fi MB, Bernstein audio riser.. what??
Power Supply OCZ Fatal1ty 700W, Iceberg 680W, Fortron Booster X3 300W for GPU
Software 2 partitions WinXP-32 on 2 drives per rig, 2 of Vista64 on 2 drives per rig
Benchmark Scores 5.9 Vista Experience Index... yay!!! What??? :)

bobzilla2009

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Messages
455 (0.09/day)
System Name Bobzilla the second
Processor AMD Phenom II 940
Motherboard Asus M3A76-CM
Cooling 3*120mm case fans
Memory 4GB 1066GHz DDR2 Kingston HyperX
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon HD5870 1GB
Storage Seagate 7200RPM 500GB
Display(s) samsung T220HD
Case Guardian 921
Power Supply OCZ MODXSTREAM Pro 700w (2*25A 12v rail)
Software Windows 7 Beta
Benchmark Scores 19753 3dmark06 15826 3dmark vantage 38.4Fps crysis benchmarking tool (1680x1050, 4xAA)
but 20% faster than cypress is still around 7% faster than the gtx295, people should be happy with that. If they're not, it's just because nvidia screwed up the release dates badly.

In the end, we aren't going to be looking at a card that should of come out 6 months after the hd5870, we'll be looking at a card that should of directly competed with the hd5870. They won't have sprinkled magic dust on it over the last few months to gain extra performance, they have just been trying to get the buggers working in a decent quantity. As it stands, ATi will likely have a nice hd5890 or even a hd5990 ready either in march or not long after, which will almost certainly retake the performance crown back until nvidia release a gtx285.

And none of that even takes into account that nvidia have no longer got a claim to any segment of the market at the moment.
Cheap ass cards = hd46xx > gt 210/220
still cheap but getting better = HD5670/50 > GT 240
Mid range = Hd5770 (around about equal to but cheaper than) GTX260 << this segment is nvidias only real hope, but no-one is goign to buy a dx10 card now, considering dx11 cards are around the same price.
High end = HD5870/5850 > gtx 285
Ridiculous end Hd5990 > gtx295

Of course all, it could be said that it's not fair that ati examples are pretty much all the 5xxx series, but that's the state of things. By march i reckon that the nv/ati ratio will be more like 60/40 than the previous 70/30. Plus, it's not like the idiots who only ever see nvidia adverts will be swayed anyway by real performance gains by ATi, right?

On a side note: AMD need to start calling their cards AMD properley now, otherwise the impact of their ads at the beginning of games will be tiny. Since people will think the processors are being advertised.
 
Last edited:

wolf

Performance Enthusiast
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
7,726 (1.25/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
I'd like to believe it's so awesome it's worth the wait and will be blazingly fast, hopefully leaving a 5870 in the dust and potentially beating the 5970 too.

Decisions are being made and lines drawn in the sand before we even have any solid numbers here people, lets remember that, no HARD performance evidence, or pricing evidence.
 

Bo_Fox

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
480 (0.09/day)
Location
Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
System Name Flame Vortec Fatal1ty (rig1), UV Tourmaline Confexia (rig2)
Processor 2 x Core i7's 4+Gigahertzzies
Motherboard BL00DR4G3 and DFI UT-X58 T3eH8
Cooling Thermalright IFX-14 (better than TRUE) 2x push-push, Customized TT Big Typhoon
Memory 6GB OCZ DDR3-1600 CAS7-7-7-1T, 6GB for 2nd rig
Video Card(s) 8800GTX for "free" S3D (mtbs3d.com), 4870 1GB, HDTV Wonder (DRM-free)
Storage WD RE3 1TB, Caviar Black 1TB 7.2k, 500GB 7.2k, Raptor X 10k
Display(s) Sony GDM-FW900 24" CRT oc'ed to 2560x1600@68Hz, Dell 2405FPW 24" PVA (HDCP-free)
Case custom gutted-out painted black case, silver UV case, lots of aesthetics-souped stuff
Audio Device(s) Sonar X-Fi MB, Bernstein audio riser.. what??
Power Supply OCZ Fatal1ty 700W, Iceberg 680W, Fortron Booster X3 300W for GPU
Software 2 partitions WinXP-32 on 2 drives per rig, 2 of Vista64 on 2 drives per rig
Benchmark Scores 5.9 Vista Experience Index... yay!!! What??? :)
Oh yeah, NV *will* have to compete with ATI's improved card after the 5870 (either 2GB version of 5870 or a steroids-fed version, named the 5890)!
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
203 (0.03/day)
System Name Gaming Rig
Processor Phenom II 940BE @ 3.7ghz
Motherboard ASUS M3A78-T
Cooling Coolermaster V8
Memory 4 x 2gb DDR2 800mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire 5870 (Asus bios)
Storage 2TB SEAGATE SATA2
Display(s) Samsung T240 24" Widescreen
Case Coolermaster Cosmos S
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi extreme music
Power Supply Corsair TX 850W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
I'd like to believe it's so awesome it's worth the wait and will be blazingly fast, hopefully leaving a 5870 in the dust and potentially beating the 5970 too.

Decisions are being made and lines drawn in the sand before we even have any solid numbers here people, lets remember that, no HARD performance evidence, or pricing evidence.

lol, u are very hopeful. I had the same hopes waiting for the ATi x1800...err, what a let down that was. Rather expect less and be happily surprised.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,209 (1.71/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
3,516 (0.64/day)
System Name Money Hole
Processor Core i7 970
Motherboard Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling Noctua UH-D14
Memory 2133Mhz 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin 998991
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X
Storage Samsung 1TB 850 Evo
Display(s) 3x Acer KG240A 144hz
Case CM HAF 932
Audio Device(s) ADI (onboard)
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
3,688 (0.62/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Felix777
Processor Core i5-3570k@stock
Motherboard Biostar H61
Memory 8gb
Video Card(s) XFX RX 470
Storage WD 500GB BLK
Display(s) Acer p236h bd
Case Haf 912
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Rosewill CAPSTONE 450watt
Software Win 10 x64
have u read anything on those that we haven't mentioned in our GTX3XX/Fermi threads? lol 101 pages is a lot of find the posts that are interesting or different from ours. 2500 some posts actually :laugh:
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
3,516 (0.64/day)
System Name Money Hole
Processor Core i7 970
Motherboard Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling Noctua UH-D14
Memory 2133Mhz 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin 998991
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X
Storage Samsung 1TB 850 Evo
Display(s) 3x Acer KG240A 144hz
Case CM HAF 932
Audio Device(s) ADI (onboard)
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
nVidia won't be in a price war with Fermi, if they are getting such few chips as suggested. They will probably keep supply tight to keep prices high.

have u read anything on those that we haven't mentioned in our GTX3XX/Fermi threads? lol 101 pages is a lot of find the posts that are interesting or different from ours. 2500 some posts actually :laugh:

:laugh: That's why I said if you have time to kill. :D


There are some things that they talk about in there that has been speculation is most places. There are a lot of people on there that understand about programming and designing chips. There are also a few that know more than what they can say because of NDA. There has been talk recently about slides coming out on Monday because that's when the NDA is up on them. Though, apparently, while they clear up some things, they won't show clocks or even be able to give us a valid idea of how it will compare to the ATI or previous nVidia cards.

Consensus: Fermi will probably hot, loud, and short lived

There is concern that the core clocks of Fermi will be lower than ATI's which will hurt DX11 tessellation since, apparently, it relies on core clocks and not shader clocks. The reason they will be lower is because of the thermal/power envelope given. IF true, this might explain why most rumors are saying Fermi will under perform, what most think it should, by only being 20% faster than 5870.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2007
Messages
5,965 (0.99/day)
Location
New York
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5950x, Ryzen 9 5980HX
Motherboard MSI X570 Tomahawk
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4(With Noctua Fans)
Memory 32Gb Crucial 3600 Ballistix
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3080, Asus 6800M
Storage Adata SX8200 1TB NVME/WD Black 1TB NVME
Display(s) Dell 27 Inch 165Hz
Case Phanteks P500A
Audio Device(s) IFI Zen Dac/JDS Labs Atom+/SMSL Amp+Rivers Audio
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Logitech G502 SE Hero
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Mk.2
VR HMD Samsung Odyssey Plus
Software Windows 10
If nvidia is really getting about 20%(I don't think they are) yields from wafers then I really wonder whats the bin ratio on those wafers is most are low binned then prices could be insane and that could be the reason why theres a delay, thats a very bad scenario but then again, . . . . the fud is saying it so. . . . . . me don't really know.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,585 (6.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
If nvidia is really getting about 20%(I don't think they are) yields from wafers then I really wonder whats the bin ratio on those wafers is most are low binned then prices could be insane and that could be the reason why theres a delay, thats a very bad scenario but then again, . . . . the fud is saying it so. . . . . . makes me feel FUD.

Remember though, the "bad" chips aren't necesarilly bad. That's how the lower variants of G92 came to be.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top