• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

x1800xtpe 512 mb more powerful than 7900 gtx in f.e.a.r proof inside

Status
Not open for further replies.

x1800xtpeown

New Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
98 (0.02/day)
my graphical settings in f.e.a.r below and benchmark, everything on max except soft shadows. im running 1792x1344 which is higher resolution than 1920x1200 more pixels, multiply the numbers 1792x1344=higher resolution than 1920x1200 and i still score higher lol than a 7900 gtx seen here.

http://www.rage3d.com/reviews/video/nvidia7950gt/index.php?p=4

7900 gtx @ 1920x1200 x4 aa x16 af =35 fps

x1800xtpe @ 1792x1344 x4 aa x16 af =36 fps higher resolution and score owned lol.





 
Last edited:

Azn Tr14dZ

New Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
5,288 (0.80/day)
Processor AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Motherboard DFI LanParty nf4 Ultra-D
Cooling Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 2x512MB GeIL
Video Card(s) ATI Radeon X800XL
Storage 2x80GB Western Digital
Display(s) HP vs17
Case SuperTalent
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster
Power Supply Ultra X-Finity 500 Watt
It's only by a few FPS kid, and why don't you run at 1920x1200? Even if you get 1 FPS higher, it's not "owned". They're both good cards, and they're close together. No need to talk shit to others about how much better your card is, even though it's only 1 more FPS.

No one cares about (you) and how much better your X1800XT is (even though it's not much better). And why don't you bench other games than F.E.A.R.? I'm sure in OpenGL games like Doom 3 and Quake IV your X1800XT would get "owned"! No need to talk shit about other people's cards!
 

x1800xtpeown

New Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
98 (0.02/day)
funny, 7900 GTX does more shader operations and and texture fill rate but lacks pixel fill rate to compare to x1800xtpe i guess that's why my x1800xtpe beating it in higher resolution, 7900 gtx @ 700,1800 would definitly beat my x1800xtpe though.
 

DaMulta

My stars went supernova
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
16,168 (2.50/day)
Location
Oklahoma T-Town
System Name Work in progress
Processor AMD 955---4Ghz
Motherboard MSi GD70
Cooling OcZ Phase/water
Memory Crucial2GB kit (1GBx2), Ballistix 240-pin DIMM, DDR3 PC3-16000
Video Card(s) CrossfireX 2 X HD 4890 1GB OCed to 1000Mhz
Storage SSD 64GB
Display(s) Envision 24'' 1920x1200
Case Using the desk ATM
Audio Device(s) Sucky onboard for now :(
Power Supply 1000W TruePower Quattro
I care that you stretched the damn screen............
 

DaMulta

My stars went supernova
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
16,168 (2.50/day)
Location
Oklahoma T-Town
System Name Work in progress
Processor AMD 955---4Ghz
Motherboard MSi GD70
Cooling OcZ Phase/water
Memory Crucial2GB kit (1GBx2), Ballistix 240-pin DIMM, DDR3 PC3-16000
Video Card(s) CrossfireX 2 X HD 4890 1GB OCed to 1000Mhz
Storage SSD 64GB
Display(s) Envision 24'' 1920x1200
Case Using the desk ATM
Audio Device(s) Sucky onboard for now :(
Power Supply 1000W TruePower Quattro
7900 gtx @ 1920x1200 x4 aa x16 af =35 fps

x1800xtpe @ 1792x1344 x4 aa x16 af =36 fps higher resolution and score owned lol.

Hmmm the GTX is running a higher resolution.....BUT like AZN said its only by ONE FRAME, now if your were pointing out quality differences....
 

x1800xtpeown

New Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
98 (0.02/day)
It's only by a few FPS kid, and why don't you run at 1920x1200? Even if you get 1 FPS higher, it's not "owned". They're both good cards, and they're close together. No need to talk shit to others about how much better your card is, even though it's only 1 more FPS.

No one cares about (you) and how much better your X1800XT is (even though it's not much better). And why don't you bench other games than F.E.A.R.? I'm sure in OpenGL games like Doom 3 and Quake IV your X1800XT would get "owned"! No need to talk shit about other people's cards!

dude you dont understand, 1792x1344 is way higher resolution than 1920x1200 and i still score 1 fps higher running more pixels on screen at higher resolution that's pretty much ownage, if it was 1920x1200 i would be scoring even higher fps because it's lower res.

1792x1344=2,408448 pixels

1920x1200=2,304000

and my x1800xtpe still scored higher fps running more pixels.

my moniter doesnt support 1920x1200, but it supports higher resolution and i beat 7900 gtx, so proves my x1800xtpe more powerful in f.e.a.r.
 

JC316

Knows what makes you tick
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
9,397 (1.41/day)
System Name Budget Gaming
Processor AMD FX6300
Motherboard Gigabyte 880GMA-USB3
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212+
Memory 8GB Ripjaws DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) HD7850 1GB
Storage 1TB Sata2
Display(s) Acer 24" LED
Case Generic black
Audio Device(s) Stock onboard
Power Supply FSP Aurum Gold 650W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
Holy batshit batman!! A whopping 1 fucking FPS. OMFGWTFBBQ dood tahts just total pownage. Anyway, turn soft shadows on and see what happens.

I am sorry, but you are going to great lenghts just to prove that an X1800 is better by an asshair than the 7900.
 

x1800xtpeown

New Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
98 (0.02/day)
7900 gtx @ 1920x1200 x4 aa x16 af =35 fps

x1800xtpe @ 1792x1344 x4 aa x16 af =36 fps higher resolution and score owned lol.

Hmmm the GTX is running a higher resolution.....BUT like AZN said its only by ONE FRAME, now if your were pointing out quality differences....

no 1792x1344=higher resolution than 1920x1200 dumbass lol

use calculator. add 1792 x 1344 then 1920 x 1200 , 1792x1344=more pixels, i ran higher resolution and still beat a 7900 gtx running lower resolution , owned STFU>
 

x1800xtpeown

New Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
98 (0.02/day)
Holy batshit batman!! A whopping 1 fucking FPS. OMFGWTFBBQ dood tahts just total pownage. Anyway, turn soft shadows on and see what happens.

I am sorry, but you are going to great lenghts just to prove that an X1800 is better by an asshair than the 7900.

1792x1344=2,408448 pixels

1920x1200=2,304000


still beat 7900 GTX, by 1 fps running higher resolution asshole lol
 

JC316

Knows what makes you tick
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
9,397 (1.41/day)
System Name Budget Gaming
Processor AMD FX6300
Motherboard Gigabyte 880GMA-USB3
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212+
Memory 8GB Ripjaws DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) HD7850 1GB
Storage 1TB Sata2
Display(s) Acer 24" LED
Case Generic black
Audio Device(s) Stock onboard
Power Supply FSP Aurum Gold 650W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
*Pulls out crystal ball* Seeing a possible banning in the future if this keeps up.
 

Azn Tr14dZ

New Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
5,288 (0.80/day)
Processor AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Motherboard DFI LanParty nf4 Ultra-D
Cooling Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 2x512MB GeIL
Video Card(s) ATI Radeon X800XL
Storage 2x80GB Western Digital
Display(s) HP vs17
Case SuperTalent
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster
Power Supply Ultra X-Finity 500 Watt
It's not way higher, it's only by 100,000 pixels. You care way to much about proving your claims. Real people wouldn't get video cards for bragging, mostly for playing.

Don't you notice you're the only one who's trying to say that your card is better than others?

And also, compare other games than F.E.A.R. why don't you? Whenever I see you, it's always F.E.A.R. that you want to bench! What are you trying to hide? Is a 7900GTX better at other games?
 

DaMulta

My stars went supernova
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
16,168 (2.50/day)
Location
Oklahoma T-Town
System Name Work in progress
Processor AMD 955---4Ghz
Motherboard MSi GD70
Cooling OcZ Phase/water
Memory Crucial2GB kit (1GBx2), Ballistix 240-pin DIMM, DDR3 PC3-16000
Video Card(s) CrossfireX 2 X HD 4890 1GB OCed to 1000Mhz
Storage SSD 64GB
Display(s) Envision 24'' 1920x1200
Case Using the desk ATM
Audio Device(s) Sucky onboard for now :(
Power Supply 1000W TruePower Quattro
I say your wrong look whats lower on monitor settings........
 

Attachments

  • lol1.JPG
    lol1.JPG
    52.6 KB · Views: 388
  • lol2.JPG
    lol2.JPG
    53.2 KB · Views: 399

JC316

Knows what makes you tick
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
9,397 (1.41/day)
System Name Budget Gaming
Processor AMD FX6300
Motherboard Gigabyte 880GMA-USB3
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212+
Memory 8GB Ripjaws DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) HD7850 1GB
Storage 1TB Sata2
Display(s) Acer 24" LED
Case Generic black
Audio Device(s) Stock onboard
Power Supply FSP Aurum Gold 650W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
My monitor says the same. 1792x1344 is lower than 1900x1200
 

Azn Tr14dZ

New Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
5,288 (0.80/day)
Processor AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Motherboard DFI LanParty nf4 Ultra-D
Cooling Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 2x512MB GeIL
Video Card(s) ATI Radeon X800XL
Storage 2x80GB Western Digital
Display(s) HP vs17
Case SuperTalent
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster
Power Supply Ultra X-Finity 500 Watt
That's true, 1920x1200 is WideScreen!
 

x1800xtpeown

New Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
98 (0.02/day)
if i ran 1920x1200 my framerate would be even higher beating the 7900 gtx, dont you people know how to compare pixels? 1792x1344=alot more pixels higher resolution more stressful than 1920x1200 and i still score higher lmfao!
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
1,789 (0.27/day)
Location
Oklahoma, USA
System Name W.I.P.
Someone quick,!! Please give him a cookie so he will caya se boca :shadedshu
 

x1800xtpeown

New Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
98 (0.02/day)
I say your wrong look whats lower on monitor settings........

1920x1200 is widescreen still not a higher resolution dude lol.

start>all programs>accessories>calculator put 1792 x 1344 = then add 1920 x 1200, the 1792x1344=higher amount of pixels.
 

DaMulta

My stars went supernova
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
16,168 (2.50/day)
Location
Oklahoma T-Town
System Name Work in progress
Processor AMD 955---4Ghz
Motherboard MSi GD70
Cooling OcZ Phase/water
Memory Crucial2GB kit (1GBx2), Ballistix 240-pin DIMM, DDR3 PC3-16000
Video Card(s) CrossfireX 2 X HD 4890 1GB OCed to 1000Mhz
Storage SSD 64GB
Display(s) Envision 24'' 1920x1200
Case Using the desk ATM
Audio Device(s) Sucky onboard for now :(
Power Supply 1000W TruePower Quattro
My bad, but look 1920x1200 is even higher on the list.....I know where the Fing Calculator is....
 

Attachments

  • lol3.JPG
    lol3.JPG
    54.4 KB · Views: 369

x1800xtpeown

New Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
98 (0.02/day)
My bad, but look 1920x1200 is even higher on the list.....I know where the Fing Calculator is....

1792x1344=4:31 aspect ratio, 1920x1200=widescreen 16:9, just because 1920x1200 is last on list, doesnt make it highest resolution, dont you know how to multiply the numbers? to find the amount of pixels? 1792x1344 looks better than 1920x1200 ask anyone only a dumbass wouldnt admit 1792x1344 has more pixels higher resolution.
 

Azn Tr14dZ

New Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
5,288 (0.80/day)
Processor AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Motherboard DFI LanParty nf4 Ultra-D
Cooling Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 2x512MB GeIL
Video Card(s) ATI Radeon X800XL
Storage 2x80GB Western Digital
Display(s) HP vs17
Case SuperTalent
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster
Power Supply Ultra X-Finity 500 Watt
This kid is really pissing me off! He's trying to prove that his X1800XT is better to some kids he doesn't know online! You need to get a life kid besides telling other people how much "better" your X1800 is!
 

JC316

Knows what makes you tick
Joined
Jan 24, 2006
Messages
9,397 (1.41/day)
System Name Budget Gaming
Processor AMD FX6300
Motherboard Gigabyte 880GMA-USB3
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212+
Memory 8GB Ripjaws DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) HD7850 1GB
Storage 1TB Sata2
Display(s) Acer 24" LED
Case Generic black
Audio Device(s) Stock onboard
Power Supply FSP Aurum Gold 650W
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit
Here is my X1800XT stock speeds using the same specs you were. The difference isn't all that great. 4-5 fps and you may have something better in you computer like 2gb of ram that could be making the diference
 

Attachments

  • Fear2.JPG
    Fear2.JPG
    166.5 KB · Views: 416

DaMulta

My stars went supernova
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
16,168 (2.50/day)
Location
Oklahoma T-Town
System Name Work in progress
Processor AMD 955---4Ghz
Motherboard MSi GD70
Cooling OcZ Phase/water
Memory Crucial2GB kit (1GBx2), Ballistix 240-pin DIMM, DDR3 PC3-16000
Video Card(s) CrossfireX 2 X HD 4890 1GB OCed to 1000Mhz
Storage SSD 64GB
Display(s) Envision 24'' 1920x1200
Case Using the desk ATM
Audio Device(s) Sucky onboard for now :(
Power Supply 1000W TruePower Quattro
1920 is a higher resoution.......... EVERYTHING SEEMS SMALLER.....
 

Azn Tr14dZ

New Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
5,288 (0.80/day)
Processor AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Motherboard DFI LanParty nf4 Ultra-D
Cooling Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 2x512MB GeIL
Video Card(s) ATI Radeon X800XL
Storage 2x80GB Western Digital
Display(s) HP vs17
Case SuperTalent
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster
Power Supply Ultra X-Finity 500 Watt
1792x1344=4:31 aspect ratio, 1920x1200=widescreen 16:9, just because 1920x1200 is last on list, doesnt make it highest resolution, dont you know how to multiply the numbers? to find the amount of pixels? 1792x1344 looks better than 1920x1200 ask anyone only a dumbass wouldnt admit 1792x1344 has more pixels higher resolution.

And if you know how to calculate, 1920x1200 is 16:10! Not 16:9!
 

x1800xtpeown

New Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
98 (0.02/day)
gonna post some half life 2 lost coast benchmarks 1600x1200 x4 aa x16 af, i whip a 7900 gtx's ass.
 

Azn Tr14dZ

New Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2006
Messages
5,288 (0.80/day)
Processor AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Motherboard DFI LanParty nf4 Ultra-D
Cooling Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 2x512MB GeIL
Video Card(s) ATI Radeon X800XL
Storage 2x80GB Western Digital
Display(s) HP vs17
Case SuperTalent
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster
Power Supply Ultra X-Finity 500 Watt
You still don't get it do you? No one cares at all! Period!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top