EastCoasthandle
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2005
- Messages
- 6,885 (0.99/day)
System Name | MY PC |
---|---|
Processor | E8400 @ 3.80Ghz > Q9650 3.60Ghz |
Motherboard | Maximus Formula |
Cooling | D5, 7/16" ID Tubing, Maze4 with Fuzion CPU WB |
Memory | XMS 8500C5D @ 1066MHz |
Video Card(s) | HD 2900 XT 858/900 to 4870 to 5870 (Keep Vreg area clean) |
Storage | 2 |
Display(s) | 24" |
Case | P180 |
Audio Device(s) | X-fi Plantinum |
Power Supply | Silencer 750 |
Software | XP Pro SP3 to Windows 7 |
Benchmark Scores | This varies from one driver to another. |
Pure PhysxInfo.com Fluidmark 1.2 will be released soon showing how well Phsyx works when multithreading optimizations are enabled. Results are below:
From the graph a Q9400 is able to out pace a GTX275 using the multithreaded optimizations for Physx. However when 2 GPUs are used they out pace both. However, when mult-core physx is off the results are far less. Currently it's is believed that the current version of physx doesn't use this. This only adds to the speculation that the current version of Physx gimps CPUs.
From the graph a Q9400 is able to out pace a GTX275 using the multithreaded optimizations for Physx. However when 2 GPUs are used they out pace both. However, when mult-core physx is off the results are far less. Currently it's is believed that the current version of physx doesn't use this. This only adds to the speculation that the current version of Physx gimps CPUs.