ragejg
New Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2010
- Messages
- 39 (0.01/day)
- Location
- Finger Lakes of Hell, NY
I thought you guys might like to see this; I got it published on launch day, albeit just barely.
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=152967
FWIW it's probably one of the only reviews that uses uses an AMD instead of superfast/expensive Intel setup. Not that that makes it better, but I thought it fitting to review a performance segment video card in a performance segment motherboard/CPU setup. Yes I fully understand the concept of CPU limitation, but I don't agree with using $300 CPUs and $200 motherboards with $200 graphics cards.
I was kinda blown away by how strong the little bugger felt vs. the GTX 465 and HD 5830. That coupled with its quietness and coolness makes it in my opinion a great buy.
I had made a thread here and at NV News, [H] and rage3d asking folks what their needs/wants were regarding GF104. I was actually able to use the data I collected in the review... So thanks, techpowerup, for contributing.
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=152967
FWIW it's probably one of the only reviews that uses uses an AMD instead of superfast/expensive Intel setup. Not that that makes it better, but I thought it fitting to review a performance segment video card in a performance segment motherboard/CPU setup. Yes I fully understand the concept of CPU limitation, but I don't agree with using $300 CPUs and $200 motherboards with $200 graphics cards.
I was kinda blown away by how strong the little bugger felt vs. the GTX 465 and HD 5830. That coupled with its quietness and coolness makes it in my opinion a great buy.
I had made a thread here and at NV News, [H] and rage3d asking folks what their needs/wants were regarding GF104. I was actually able to use the data I collected in the review... So thanks, techpowerup, for contributing.
Last edited: