- Joined
- Apr 14, 2010
- Messages
- 54 (0.01/day)
- Location
- On Earth...
System Name | Prototype I || Prototype II |
---|---|
Processor | Core i7 2670QM @ 2.2Ghz || Core i7 4790K @ Stock |
Motherboard | Lenovo Base Board || Asus Maximus VII Hero |
Cooling | Stock Cooler || Corsair H100i |
Memory | 8GB Corsair DDR3 (1066Mhz) || G.Skills Ripjaws X 8GB DDR3 1866Mhz |
Video Card(s) | AMD 7670M || Asus GTX 980 Poseidon |
Storage | Samsung Evo Pro 250GB || Crucial MX100 512GBx2 |
Display(s) | Dell UltraSharp 24" - U2414H |
Case | NZXT S340 |
Audio Device(s) | Onboard |
Power Supply | SeaSonic M12II 620 Bronze 620W |
Software | Windows 10 64bit |
1680x1050 is not anywhere close to his resolution*. 1280x1024 is:
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/AMD/HD_6950_1_GB/images/perfrel_1280.gif
He already decided so it's a moot point, but I really think that for his resolution (and folding and physx) the GTX560 ti is much much better. For some reason GTX4xx and 5xx perform much better on lower resolutions than their counterparts.
* 1680x1050 = 1.76 Mpixels
1440x900 = 1.29 Mpixels
1280x1024 = 1.31 Mpixels
That's right, i won't be upgrading my monitor so 1440x900 is max i will go for. Lower resolutions welcomed.
To be very frank i am being paranoid for PhysX.