• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

[XBitLabs] Intel’s New Extreme Processors Will Barely Improve Performance Significant

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
To be honest X79 chipset as it is, it blows.

I mean come on it's a glorified z68.

Well, the PCH doesn't do a whole lot now, on skt1366 you have PCI-E running off the IOH with QPI. X79 doesn't need QPI to the chipset anymore because the bandwidth is unnecessary because the PCI-E controller is on the CPU. X79 doesn't do much because it doesn't have to. What about the PCH do you not like? Whatever the PCH doesn't have IVB-E/SB-E have more than enough PCI-E lanes to let you add stuff to your machine. This isn't a gimped 1155 CPU with only 20 lanes (16 usable on SB). I don't know about your machine but mine does 16x/8x/8x/8x which gives you a lot of options for expansion if you're not running 3 or 4 video cards, not to mention the 1x slots in between some of them.

I've been thoroughly satisfied with my 3820... and if you're complaining about how X79 only has 2 SATA 6Gb ports, then unless you have more than 2 SSDs, you're complaining about a non-issue and if you have the money to invest in that many SSDs, I'm willing to bet you have the money to invest in a nice controller to handle them as well. At least Intel's SATA 6Gb ports run at a full 6Gbit though.

X79 might be a glorified z68 board, but both the X79 and z68 are glorified ICHs with a couple extra PCI-E lanes just in case. If you took the PCI-E controller out of the IOH on 1366, the IOH wouldn't do a lot, so you might as well make it do what the ICH used to.

So just because X79 doesn't have everything you ever wanted does not mean that it's a bad chipset.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
17,866 (3.00/day)
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K @ 4GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance Black DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming X Trio
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Black 4TB | WD Blue 6TB
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix XG27UQR (4K, 144Hz, G-SYNC compatible) | Asus MG28UQ (4K, 60Hz, FreeSync compatible)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i
Mouse Microsoft Intellimouse Pro - Black Shadow
Keyboard Yes
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Now with AMD out of the running, these are dark days indeed. It looks like I won't be upgrading my 2700K any time soon.

When Intel release a true 8 core CPU at a reasonable price, then I'll consider it.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,145 (0.69/day)
Processor 8700k Intel
Motherboard z370 MSI Godlike Gaming
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS Copper 840 with D5
Memory TridentZ RGB G.Skill C16 3600MHz
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage Crucial MX SSDs
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Core P5 Thermaltake
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Mouse Logitech
Keyboard Corsair
Software Win10
Well, the PCH doesn't do a whole lot now, on skt1366 you have PCI-E running off the IOH with QPI. X79 doesn't need QPI to the chipset anymore because the bandwidth is unnecessary because the PCI-E controller is on the CPU. X79 doesn't do much because it doesn't have to. What about the PCH do you not like? Whatever the PCH doesn't have IVB-E/SB-E have more than enough PCI-E lanes to let you add stuff to your machine. This isn't a gimped 1155 CPU with only 20 lanes (16 usable on SB). I don't know about your machine but mine does 16x/8x/8x/8x which gives you a lot of options for expansion if you're not running 3 or 4 video cards, not to mention the 1x slots in between some of them.

I've been thoroughly satisfied with my 3820... and if you're complaining about how X79 only has 2 SATA 6Gb ports, then unless you have more than 2 SSDs, you're complaining about a non-issue and if you have the money to invest in that many SSDs, I'm willing to bet you have the money to invest in a nice controller to handle them as well. At least Intel's SATA 6Gb ports run at a full 6Gbit though.

X79 might be a glorified z68 board, but both the X79 and z68 are glorified ICHs with a couple extra PCI-E lanes just in case. If you took the PCI-E controller out of the IOH on 1366, the IOH wouldn't do a lot, so you might as well make it do what the ICH used to.

So just because X79 doesn't have everything you ever wanted does not mean that it's a bad chipset.

It should have had every single SATA port on 6Gb/s, I don't want to run a PCIe controller for that.

Still my board has the classic two 6Gb/s and two additional 6Gb/s so I'm set.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
It should have had every single SATA port on 6Gb/s, I don't want to run a PCIe controller for that.

Yeah, but then DMI has to be able to let 6 ports saturate SATA 6Gbit. That's more bandwidth than DMI 2.0 has. PCI-E on the other hand bypasses DMI (unless you're using one of those 8 lanes off the PCH,) so a good controller should perform just as well. I have a Marvell SATA 6Gb controller on my board as well in addition to the X79 ports, but it's a bit underwhelming in performance. I think that has to do with how much PCI-E bandwidth it has though and the fact that it has to go through the PCH first anyways.

Honestly, most users, even those looking at lga2011, don't really need more than what X79 offers, because only SSDs are really going to take advantage of SATA 6Gb. Running more than 2 SSDs is a very specific use case, which I'm sure is a market segment so small that Intel could care less.

AMD on the other hand still has HyperTransport for PCI-E and the NB/SB communication. So there is more bandwidth to be had, so more SATA 6Gbit ports isn't hard to achieve. Honestly, I'm surprised PCI-E hasn't replaced DMI for CPU/PCH communication.
Still my board has the classic two 6Gb/s and two additional 6Gb/s so I'm set.
Yup, and you still have 2 SSDs. :cool:
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,145 (0.69/day)
Processor 8700k Intel
Motherboard z370 MSI Godlike Gaming
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS Copper 840 with D5
Memory TridentZ RGB G.Skill C16 3600MHz
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage Crucial MX SSDs
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Core P5 Thermaltake
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Mouse Logitech
Keyboard Corsair
Software Win10
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
4,054 (0.58/day)
Location
Ancient Greece, Acropolis (Time Lord)
System Name RiseZEN Gaming PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @ Auto
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X570-E Gaming ATX Motherboard
Cooling Corsair H115i Elite Capellix AIO, 280mm Radiator, Dual RGB 140mm ML Series PWM Fans
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) ASUS DUAL RX 6700 XT DUAL-RX6700XT-12G
Storage Corsair Force MP500 480GB M.2 & MP510 480GB M.2 - 2 x WD_BLACK 1TB SN850X NVMe 1TB
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix 34” XG349C 180Hz 1440p + Asus ROG 27" MG278Q 144Hz WQHD 1440p
Case Corsair Obsidian Series 450D Gaming Case
Audio Device(s) SteelSeries 5Hv2 w/ Sound Blaster Z SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750x Power Supply
Mouse Razer Death-Adder + Viper 8K HZ Ambidextrous Gaming Mouse - Ergonomic Left Hand Edition
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spectrum RGB Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64-Bit Edition
Benchmark Scores I'm the Doctor, Doctor Who. The Definition of Gaming is PC Gaming...
Interesting, as Intel is flexing its Stagnation muscles. This is what happens when competition is lacking.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
What If I wanna install two more? :(

Then like you said, you have the secondary SATA3 controller. I would suspect that they wouldn't be the same size and if they were and you wanted to run RAID-0 on all 4, I would say that you're insane and that you're asking for the RAID to fail prematurely since you've already been using two of them.

It's a disaster waiting to happen, and if you want RAID on more than two SSDs, you're better off with a hardware controller anyways because you want the bandwidth and DMI isn't going to offer it. If I recall correctly z77 isn't better because the PCH still only offers 2x6Gbit ports from what I've read so far and still uses DMI 2.0.

So no matter what Intel-based machine you have, you'd be better off getting a nice hardware controller and at least that way you're going directly to the CPU from PCI-E as opposed to going through the PCH if you want more then 2 6Gbit ports at full speed.

The chipset also has power consumption and TDP constraints. Remember that it has to be passively cooled. Not to say that it's always passively cooled but it's a bad plan to require active cooling for something that shouldn't need it.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,145 (0.69/day)
Processor 8700k Intel
Motherboard z370 MSI Godlike Gaming
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS Copper 840 with D5
Memory TridentZ RGB G.Skill C16 3600MHz
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage Crucial MX SSDs
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Core P5 Thermaltake
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Mouse Logitech
Keyboard Corsair
Software Win10
Then like you said, you have the secondary SATA3 controller. I would suspect that they wouldn't be the same size and if they were and you wanted to run RAID-0 on all 4, I would say that you're insane and that you're asking for the RAID to fail prematurely since you've already been using two of them.

It's a disaster waiting to happen, and if you want RAID on more than two SSDs, you're better off with a hardware controller anyways because you want the bandwidth and DMI isn't going to offer it. If I recall correctly z77 isn't better because the PCH still only offers 2x6Gbit ports from what I've read so far and still uses DMI 2.0.

So no matter what Intel-based machine you have, you'd be better off getting a nice hardware controller and at least that way you're going directly to the CPU from PCI-E as opposed to going through the PCH if you want more then 2 6Gbit ports at full speed.

The chipset also has power consumption and TDP constraints. Remember that it has to be passively cooled. Not to say that it's always passively cooled but it's a bad plan to require active cooling for something that shouldn't need it.

Would have gotten an Extreme11 X79 if it had been released early, too bad it doesn't support raid 5 :(
 
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
4,966 (0.92/day)
System Name i7-PC / HTPC / iMac
Processor i7 3820 / Phenom II 940
Motherboard GIGABYTE G1.ASSASSIN2 / M3A79-T Deluxe
Cooling Corsair Hydro H100i / Scythe II (HS only)
Memory G.SKILL Trident X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) DDR3 1600mhz / 4GB DDR2 1066 (@800) Corsair Dominator
Video Card(s) GB Radeon HD 7950s 3GB / GB Radeon HD 7950s 3GB
Storage 2x 80GB Intel X-25, 2x600gb SATA, 1x1tb 5400RPM storage /1x600GB, 3x500GB,1x160,1x120 SATA
Display(s) 1x 27" Yamakasi / Vizio 42" HDTV
Case Lian Li Lancool PC-K58 / Antec 900
Audio Device(s) HT Omega Striker 7.1 / Onboard and HDMI from ATi Card
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 750W / 610W
Software Ubuntu / Windows 8.1 Pro / OS X / PHPStorm / Gaming
SSD's just aren't viable for me.

See I can't go back. I use platters for all real data, only storing OS/apps on the ssd. A second ssd for caching and a few games if necessary. $300 spent over the last 3 years to get 250gb of ssd space.

yeah it's more than platter, but well worth it imo. it's not the boot but the actual operation of the system that makes the difference for me. using windows, doing almost anything, is noticeably faster on my ssd than on a standard 7200rpm platter drive.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
Would have gotten an Extreme11 X79 if it had been released early, too bad it doesn't support raid 5 :(

I know. I got my board before it came out but the lack of RAID-5 turned me off pretty fast. For that extra cost I would get buy an LSI RAID card. :p
 
Joined
Sep 24, 2008
Messages
2,665 (0.47/day)
System Name Dire Wolf IV
Processor Intel Core i9 14900K
Motherboard Asus ROG STRIX Z790-I GAMING WIFI
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 280
Memory 2x24GB Corsair DDR5 6667
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX4080 FE
Storage AORUS Gen4 7300 1TB + Western Digital SN750 500GB
Display(s) Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED, 3440x1440, 165hz)
Case Corsair Airflow 2000D
Power Supply Corsair SF1000L
Mouse Razer Deathadder Essential
Keyboard Chuangquan CQ84
Software Windows 11 Professional
I do not have much time for forums in my spare time, but i will be on as much as possible.

Okay.

I have over 15 years of education in this field, studied in 3 countries. I have specialized my knowledge on this field.

Really, please do tell.

I cannot provide "proof", because i do not have 100 billion dollars to start manufacturing such components. Think what you want, but see the possibility.

You can provide an explanation as to which technological processes should be used to make such components, and provide proof as to the fact that Intel (or anyone else) is capable of producing such chips.

Why don't you find another specialist and ask, just to get confirmation?

Because you put forth the claim, back it up.
 
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
2,645 (0.56/day)
1) Speculation about what technology exists out there is foolish. There have been laboratory tests that show transistors operable at 10 GHz. Lab tests and functional chips are two separate things. If you think you can best Intel so thoroughly then invest money and use a fab to produce sample chips. Not a 100 billion investment, and not as insane as spouting ideas without any facts backing you up.

2) X79 is a disappointment. I base this on two facts. The PCH connectivity has been neutered, and its scale was cut back drastically. To the first point, Intel decided to only insure that 6 SATA ports worked. Some manufacturers used the PCH, and managed to get the full 10 SATA ports working (though these boards were expensive). I know of no better way to describe this than Intel neutering X79 for a release date and cheaper cost.

To the scale cutting, consider what was leaked months before release. 14 SATA, with at least 6 being III (if memory serves), and multiple integrated USB 3.0 ports appeared to be in the X79 wheelhouse. What we got instead was a PCH based off of 3 generation old lithography that required active cooling. I don't know about anyone else, but I wanted a RAID 5 array for data storage considering how much this system was going to cost. I didn't expect to spend more money to have the storage I had on my Core 2 Quad.


3) Performance. You have got to be freaking kidding me. Intel expects people to spend another $500 to upgrade, and they deliver a performance increase between 10 and 20% maximum (I am assuming 6.25% base clock increase, and 10% increase due to smaller lithography and minor improvements). I can't see why anyone would upgrade from SB-e to IB-e unless they needed to burn money. The lack of upgrade from X79 to X89 (or whatever Intel might call an IB-e upgraded PCH) is the last nail in the "is this actually an upgrade?" coffin.


4) Intel is releasing too little too late. IB-e, released at the verge of Haswell, is just giving the high end consumer the finger. I just hope Intel releases IB-e as a soldered component, otherwise IB-e will not sell.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
10,881 (1.63/day)
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Senile
Processor I7-4790K@4.8 GHz 24/7
Motherboard MSI Z97-G45 Gaming
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) GIGABYTE Vega 64
Storage Samsung EVO 500GB / 8 Different WDs / QNAP TS-253 8GB NAS with 2x10Tb WD Blue
Display(s) 34" LG 34CB88-P 21:9 Curved UltraWide QHD (3440*1440) *FREE_SYNC*
Case Rosewill
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Corsair Strafe RGB & G610 Orion Red
Software Win 10
Interesting, as Intel is flexing its Stagnation muscles. This is what happens when competition is lacking.

They are also spending a lot of resources on mobile, we'll see where that goes.

They need some new grand redesigned architecture. Yea, like they did when they dropped Netburst and went back to the Core architecture, lol.

What's in store for Skylake?
 
Top