• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Why is link speed only x8?

fullinfusion

Vanguard Beta Tester
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
9,909 (1.67/day)
Sorry for this question, but can someone help me understand why this motherboard is only running @ x8 speed with both my 7970's installed on the maximus IV extreme-z68 board?

Under details


 
Last edited:

95Viper

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
12,645 (2.24/day)
Did you try putting a load on 'em, with the render test (the little "?" mark beside the Bus Interface info)?

The cards are probably in the 2D energy savings condition.
 

fullinfusion

Vanguard Beta Tester
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
9,909 (1.67/day)
Yes I have.

specs say x16 x8 x8 or x16 x16?

manual says slot 1 and 3 for best results in cross fire mode. It's kinda stumping me.

 
Last edited:

95Viper

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 12, 2008
Messages
12,645 (2.24/day)
Well, if I am looking at it right... that board will have one slot at x16 or two at x8.

That is what I gather by looking at this chart from the manual.
picture1.png

Have you ever crossfired before with different results?

Maybe someone else will have more insight into this, I have not used but a single(meets all my needs) for quite a while.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Well, if I am looking at it right... that board will have one slot at x16 or two at x8.

That is what I gather by looking at this chart from the manual.
View attachment 50701

Have you ever crossfired before with different results?

Maybe someone else will have more insight into this, I have not used but a single(meets all my needs) for quite a while.

Yep, that is exactly it.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
28,472 (4.25/day)
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 10850K@5.2GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z470 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro w/ Noctua NF-A14 Fans
Memory 32GB DDR4-3600
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super
Storage 500GB SX8200 Pro + 8TB with 1TB SSD Cache
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG280K 4K 28"
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply eVGA SuperNOVA 1000w G3
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
so does Z77 run the same?

It all depends on the board. On socket 1155 Intel only provides 16 PCI-E lanes to graphics. So they are usually split into x8/x8. However, there are some boards that use PCI-E switches to give x8/x8/x8/x8 or x8/x16/x16. However, those extra slots are still sharing the original 16 lanes to communicate with the CPU. So even on your board, those two x16 slots running off the nf200 switch are actually sharing an x8 link to the CPU.
 
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
2,318 (0.35/day)
System Name MONEY PIT
Processor i7-3770K @ 4800 1.20v batch #3231B415 Delided
Motherboard ASrock Z77 OC Formula w onboard waterblocks
Cooling Apogee HD, MCP655,rad MCR320-XP,Micro Rev2 res
Memory G,skill Trident X F3-2400C10D-16GTX
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 980 Ti Classified with EK nickel/acetal waterblock installed
Storage 2x120gig Wildfire raid0 2x120gig VERTEX3 raid0
Display(s) 3/ Samsung2343bwx + 65in LG 4K
Case NZXT Phantom White w/red
Audio Device(s) ReCon3d fatal1ty pro, Logitech z906 THX
Power Supply corsair AX860i
Mouse Rat7
Software 64bit ++++ win 10
"The NVIDIA NF200 chip supports 32 PCI-E 2.5GT/s lanes.
Here is how it works, NF200 takes the native 8 lane 5GT/s bus and doubles the bandwidth to 16x5GT/s so you would have 32 lanes of 2.5GT/S PCI-E bus for 16x SLI. Do not be fooled it doesn’t add PCI-E lanes; instead it splits the ones already present and adds bandwidth. It is really great at consolidating and making sure the proper devices are fed full bandwidth. Although we have 32 lanes of PCI-E bandwidth GIGABYTE says the board only supports 3-way SLI. This is most likely because 4-way SLI would be 8x each card and performance would take a hit. This board also supports CrossFireX which is the ATI/AMD equivalent for SLI technology.
On this board ALL the PCI-E lanes from the processor are fed directly into the NF200. On many X58 boards and P55 boards, only a portion of the PCI-E lanes are fed to the NF200, the reason is that USB3 and SATA6G work off the high speed PCI-E bus, but this board is one of the few exceptions. The new P67 PCH connects to all of these devices through a secondary PCI-E bus, that has its own clock generator, and its own set of 8 PCI-E switches. The PCH then communicates to the CPU through a high speed 20GB/s DMI interface. The NF200 connects to the 4 PCI-E slots through 2 switches.
Many people have mixed views of the benefits of 16x/16x vs 16x/8x SLI, regardless the NF200 is needed for proper SLI on LGA 1155 motherboard. This motherboard will probably perform exceptionally at SLI with the NF200 because all the PCI-E lanes from the processor are used solely for the PCI-E slots."

hope this helps
 
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
1,980 (0.42/day)
Location
Mainland Britain
System Name H2o Box
Processor Intel(R) Xeon e5-2690 v2 Stock 3.300 GHz stock
Motherboard MSI X79A-G43 Plus (MS-7760) v3
Cooling CPU EK & Phobya G-Changer 360 V2.0 RAD H2o VGA "AlphaCool M18" Hybrid [pump replaced 18/8/21]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 16Gb 11-12-12-32 2T @ 1866Mhz [locked]
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080ti AMP EXTREME
Storage HyperX Fury 120GB & Savage 480GB SSD, Seagate 250GB,250GB 7200rpm Kingston 64GB SSD
Display(s) Asus TUF Gaming VG32VQR 2560*1440 165Hz VA Panel
Case Corsair O-800D
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Power Supply Be Quiet! [Dark Power Pro 11] 1200W CM replaced [7-4-2017]
Mouse Zelotes T-90
Keyboard K66 Mechanical US Layout
Software Win 10 Pro 64Bit v 20H2 / OS [build 19043.1237] WFEP 120.2212.3530.0
Hi

so does Z77 run the same?

For dual PCIe x16 would need to run skt 1366 x58 or skt 2011 x79 [*some limitations still apply electrical x4, x8 and x16]

atb (all the best)

Law-II
 

fullinfusion

Vanguard Beta Tester
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
9,909 (1.67/day)
"The NVIDIA NF200 chip supports 32 PCI-E 2.5GT/s lanes.
Here is how it works, NF200 takes the native 8 lane 5GT/s bus and doubles the bandwidth to 16x5GT/s so you would have 32 lanes of 2.5GT/S PCI-E bus for 16x SLI. Do not be fooled it doesn’t add PCI-E lanes; instead it splits the ones already present and adds bandwidth. It is really great at consolidating and making sure the proper devices are fed full bandwidth. Although we have 32 lanes of PCI-E bandwidth GIGABYTE says the board only supports 3-way SLI. This is most likely because 4-way SLI would be 8x each card and performance would take a hit. This board also supports CrossFireX which is the ATI/AMD equivalent for SLI technology.
On this board ALL the PCI-E lanes from the processor are fed directly into the NF200. On many X58 boards and P55 boards, only a portion of the PCI-E lanes are fed to the NF200, the reason is that USB3 and SATA6G work off the high speed PCI-E bus, but this board is one of the few exceptions. The new P67 PCH connects to all of these devices through a secondary PCI-E bus, that has its own clock generator, and its own set of 8 PCI-E switches. The PCH then communicates to the CPU through a high speed 20GB/s DMI interface. The NF200 connects to the 4 PCI-E slots through 2 switches.
Many people have mixed views of the benefits of 16x/16x vs 16x/8x SLI, regardless the NF200 is needed for proper SLI on LGA 1155 motherboard. This motherboard will probably perform exceptionally at SLI with the NF200 because all the PCI-E lanes from the processor are used solely for the PCI-E slots."

hope this helps

Well thanks for all that :respect:

So really there isn't much of a benefit so far from board to board running 16x16 or 8x8 :confused:
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,884 (0.76/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Core i7-12700k
Motherboard Z690 Aero G D4
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Video Card(s) RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming
Storage Plextor M10P 2TB
Display(s) InnoCN 27M2V
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-5 Plus
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Well thanks for all that :respect:

So really there isn't much of a benefit so far from board to board running 16x16 or 8x8 :confused:
It have been tested multiple times that GPUs just do not require that much bandwidth in games.
Even if the card is running on 4x the effects on performance is minimal. Latency makes a lot more difference than bandwidth in this case.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
1,039 (0.25/day)
Location
Babylon 5
System Name DaBeast! DaBeast2!
Processor AMD AM4 Ryzen 9 5900X 12C24T/AMD AM4 RYZEN 9 3900X 12C/24T
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Xtreme/Gigabyte X570S Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Thermaltake Water 3.0 360/Thermalright PA 120 SE
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance RGB RT DDR4 3600C16/2x 16GB Patriot Elite II DDR4 4000MHz
Video Card(s) XFX MERC 310 RX 7900 XTX 24GB/Sapphire Nitro+ RX 6900 XT 16GB
Storage 500GB Crucial P3 Plus NVMe PCIe 4x4 + 4TB Lexar NM790 NVMe PCIe 4x4 + TG Cardea Zero Z NVMe PCIe 4x4
Display(s) Samsung LC49HG90DMEX 32:9 144Hz Freesync 2/Acer XR341CK 75Hz 21:9 Freesync
Case CoolerMaster H500M/SOLDAM XR-1
Audio Device(s) iFi Micro iDSD BL + Philips Fidelio B97/FostexHP-A4 + LG SP8YA
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Platinum/Enermax MAXREVO 1500
Mouse Logitech G703/Logitech G603 WL
Keyboard Logitech G613/Keychron K2
Software Win11 Pro/Win11 Pro
Hi



For dual PCIe x16 would need to run skt 1366 x58 or skt 2011 x79 [*some limitations still apply electrical x4, x8 and x16]

atb (all the best)

Law-II
Yep, for full, or near full bandwidth, you'd want IB + Z77 mobos (I believe) and LGA2011 CPUs + X79 mobos. Here's a screenshot of my 3x HD7970 on my R4E:
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.72/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
NF200.... wasnt that on older boards? Isnt it all handled by the PLX chip these days?

EDIT: I see a Z68 based board.

EDIT2: Isnt that the PLX chip down by the 4x slot at the bottom?
 
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
1,980 (0.42/day)
Location
Mainland Britain
System Name H2o Box
Processor Intel(R) Xeon e5-2690 v2 Stock 3.300 GHz stock
Motherboard MSI X79A-G43 Plus (MS-7760) v3
Cooling CPU EK & Phobya G-Changer 360 V2.0 RAD H2o VGA "AlphaCool M18" Hybrid [pump replaced 18/8/21]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 16Gb 11-12-12-32 2T @ 1866Mhz [locked]
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080ti AMP EXTREME
Storage HyperX Fury 120GB & Savage 480GB SSD, Seagate 250GB,250GB 7200rpm Kingston 64GB SSD
Display(s) Asus TUF Gaming VG32VQR 2560*1440 165Hz VA Panel
Case Corsair O-800D
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Power Supply Be Quiet! [Dark Power Pro 11] 1200W CM replaced [7-4-2017]
Mouse Zelotes T-90
Keyboard K66 Mechanical US Layout
Software Win 10 Pro 64Bit v 20H2 / OS [build 19043.1237] WFEP 120.2212.3530.0
Joined
Nov 5, 2012
Messages
153 (0.04/day)
Location
Los Angeles
System Name HP ProLiant DL360P G8
Processor 2x Xeon e2690
Motherboard HP
Cooling 6 Delta fans
Memory 192gb ECC ddr3 @1333
Video Card(s) Quadro k4200
Storage 4x 1.2TB Dell SAS raid 0
Display(s) iDrac over IP
Case HP 1U
Power Supply 2x 1100w Platinum PSUs
Mouse iDrac
Keyboard iDrac
Software Windows Server 2019
So to answer the original question, yes running crossfire (7970's) at 8x-8x is perfectly normal for that board. ;)
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
1,039 (0.25/day)
Location
Babylon 5
System Name DaBeast! DaBeast2!
Processor AMD AM4 Ryzen 9 5900X 12C24T/AMD AM4 RYZEN 9 3900X 12C/24T
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Xtreme/Gigabyte X570S Aorus Elite AX
Cooling Thermaltake Water 3.0 360/Thermalright PA 120 SE
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance RGB RT DDR4 3600C16/2x 16GB Patriot Elite II DDR4 4000MHz
Video Card(s) XFX MERC 310 RX 7900 XTX 24GB/Sapphire Nitro+ RX 6900 XT 16GB
Storage 500GB Crucial P3 Plus NVMe PCIe 4x4 + 4TB Lexar NM790 NVMe PCIe 4x4 + TG Cardea Zero Z NVMe PCIe 4x4
Display(s) Samsung LC49HG90DMEX 32:9 144Hz Freesync 2/Acer XR341CK 75Hz 21:9 Freesync
Case CoolerMaster H500M/SOLDAM XR-1
Audio Device(s) iFi Micro iDSD BL + Philips Fidelio B97/FostexHP-A4 + LG SP8YA
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Platinum/Enermax MAXREVO 1500
Mouse Logitech G703/Logitech G603 WL
Keyboard Logitech G613/Keychron K2
Software Win11 Pro/Win11 Pro
Hi



Z77 dose not cut it, even when using a PLX PEX 8747 chip solution to increase lanes [it is not a *true solution to the reduction in PCIe Lanes]

Source - http://www.anandtech.com/show/6170/...x-8747-featuring-gigabyte-asrock-ecs-and-evga

atb

Law-II
Thanks, that was.....informative.:) And yet, at the same time, quite confusing.....and no, I ain't too bright especially with such tech stuff. So, does that mean that as of now, only X79 does have true multi GPU full bandwidth support? Is my screenshot an accurate representation of the bandwidth on my setup?
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.72/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
TPU has done a review on 8x/8x with 680 and 7970 and its average performance loss across all games at 1080p was 1%.
 
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
1,980 (0.42/day)
Location
Mainland Britain
System Name H2o Box
Processor Intel(R) Xeon e5-2690 v2 Stock 3.300 GHz stock
Motherboard MSI X79A-G43 Plus (MS-7760) v3
Cooling CPU EK & Phobya G-Changer 360 V2.0 RAD H2o VGA "AlphaCool M18" Hybrid [pump replaced 18/8/21]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 16Gb 11-12-12-32 2T @ 1866Mhz [locked]
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080ti AMP EXTREME
Storage HyperX Fury 120GB & Savage 480GB SSD, Seagate 250GB,250GB 7200rpm Kingston 64GB SSD
Display(s) Asus TUF Gaming VG32VQR 2560*1440 165Hz VA Panel
Case Corsair O-800D
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Power Supply Be Quiet! [Dark Power Pro 11] 1200W CM replaced [7-4-2017]
Mouse Zelotes T-90
Keyboard K66 Mechanical US Layout
Software Win 10 Pro 64Bit v 20H2 / OS [build 19043.1237] WFEP 120.2212.3530.0
Hi

only X79 does have true multi GPU full bandwidth support?

Yes; *true multi GPU full bandwidth [at this time]

Is my screenshot an accurate representation of the bandwidth on my setup

Yes; *Full Dual support [x16 x16 dual, x16 x8 x16 tri, x16 x8 x8 x8 quad] Asus ROG Rampage IV Extreme

nb: Nice Rig :toast:

atb

Law-II
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
Sorry for this question, but can someone help me understand why this motherboard is only running @ x8 speed with both my 7970's installed on the maximus IV extreme-z68 board?

Under details


http://img.techpowerup.org/130403/333.png



Even with PLX chip onboard, ASUS feels x8/x8 native is better.


I have tested many boards now with PLX8474, and on some of those boards, x16/x16 with PLX is actually faster, so this confused me. With the MVE, no matter what you do, as long as more than one GPU is installed, you have the top slot @ x8, directly connected to the CPU.

TPU has done a review on 8x/8x with 680 and 7970 and its average performance loss across all games at 1080p was 1%.

that was just with a single card, not multi-GPU, so doesn't really mean a thing. Testing x8, without multi GPU, is kind of silly...no board supports just x8 for a single GPU, all are x16, except one or two mITX that only give x4 PCIe.
 

brandonwh64

Addicted to Bacon and StarCrunches!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2009
Messages
19,542 (3.67/day)
I have a Z68 and it shows PCIex 2.0 X16 with my 7970

With two 7970's it will be at x8 2.0

 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.72/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
that was just with a single card, not multi-GPU, so doesn't really mean a thing. Testing x8, without multi GPU, is kind of silly...no board supports just x8 for a single GPU, all are x16, except one or two mITX that only give x4 PCIe.
Right, but they each get 8x bandwidth so why would the story be different? Am I missing some overhead or something?
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
Right, but they each get 8x bandwidth so why would the story be different? Am I missing some overhead or something?

Yep, just overhead for inter-GPU communication(I believe). With the Crossfire bridge only offering 1 GB/s, three and four GPU configurations connecting to the main card with only one bridge, may run into bandwidth issues.

The perfect example is x16/x4 PCIe...5-10% performance lost at most for a single card. But try Crossfire, and you can lose up to 50% compared to x8/x8.

I'm not sure why, but it does seem to be confined to DX10 and DX11 apps, and maybe because some data from each frame is shared for the next..or something...GPUs are not my department of TPU.:p
 

fullinfusion

Vanguard Beta Tester
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
9,909 (1.67/day)
Dave, im on the road atm and seen others talk about a video you posted on cross fire problems. Would you be kind and link me to it :)

And thanks for all the info guy's
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
13,147 (2.96/day)
Location
Concord, NH, USA
System Name Apollo
Processor Intel Core i9 9880H
Motherboard Some proprietary Apple thing.
Memory 64GB DDR4-2667
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, 8GB HBM2
Storage 1TB Apple NVMe, 4TB External
Display(s) Laptop @ 3072x1920 + 2x LG 5k Ultrafine TB3 displays
Case MacBook Pro (16", 2019)
Audio Device(s) AirPods Pro, Sennheiser HD 380s w/ FIIO Alpen 2, or Logitech 2.1 Speakers
Power Supply 96w Power Adapter
Mouse Logitech MX Master 3
Keyboard Logitech G915, GL Clicky
Software MacOS 12.1
that was just with a single card, not multi-GPU, so doesn't really mean a thing. Testing x8, without multi GPU, is kind of silly...no board supports just x8 for a single GPU, all are x16, except one or two mITX that only give x4 PCIe.

GPUs aren't the only thing that uses PCI-E. You could easily have a RAID card that uses 4 lanes and you have to go down to x8/x8 to run the GPU and the RAID card together, so I wouldn't call it silly.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
You could easily have a RAID card that uses 4 lanes and you have to go down to x8/x8 to run the GPU and the RAID card together, so I wouldn't call it silly.

When there's x16/x4 boards for exactly that sort of config(with x4 run via chipset), yeah, it'd be a silly purchase decision, IMHO.

Dave, im on the road atm and seen others talk about a video you posted on cross fire problems. Would you be kind and link me to it :)

And thanks for all the info guy's



Sent a PM.
 
Top