• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Crucial M550 512 GB

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,956 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Crucial's new M550 SSD is based on an updated version of the Marvell controller, which means it no longer uses overprovisioning: you get to use the whole capacity. In our real-life testing we also see a slight performance improvement, which is great, especially considering the M550's competitive pricing.

Show full review
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
954 (0.25/day)
Location
Cumberland Plateau
System Name EVGA-FX | Lenny (Lenovo Y480)
Processor AMD FX-8320 @ 4.5GHz 1.416v | i7 3610qm
Motherboard Asus M5A99FX Pro R2.0
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE
Memory 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600 | 8gb DDR3 @ 1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX780 Classified @ 1228MHz 1.615v | GT640m LE
Storage Crucial M500 480GB, WD Caviar Blue 500GB, WD Scorpio Blue 750GB | Samsung 250GB 840
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 1440p | 42" Vizio 3D LCD TV 1080p
Case CoolerMaster HAF XB Evo
Power Supply Seasonic G-650
Software Windows 6.3.9600
Chart on the first page has Model: M500 512 GB CT512M550SSD1
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
502 (0.14/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
Unlike the M500 Series, no overprovisioning is used, so you do get to use all the space the flash chips provide.

Sorry to break it to ya, but this is not true at all. Every single ssd (and flash device) on earth uses overprovising, otherwise it simply wouldn't work. The reason m550 has more usable space is, because they are using much less space for RAIN due to 20nm flash being mature enough at this point.
And yeah, when you buy ssd with 512GB, it actually has 512GiB of raw flash. The difference between GB and GiB is usually used for overprovisioning.

The M500 uses overprovisioning, though, so it only offers up 480 GB instead of 512 GB, like the M550

Again, not true.
 
Last edited:

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,956 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
Unlike the M500 Series, no overprovisioning is used, so you do get to use all the space the flash chips provide.

Sorry to break it to ya, but this is not true at all. Every single ssd (and flash device) on earth uses overprovising, otherwise it simply wouldn't work. The reason m550 has more usable space is, because they are using much less space for RAIN due to 20nm flash being mature enough at this point.
And yeah, when you buy ssd with 512GB, it actually has 512GiB of raw flash. The difference between GB and GiB is usually used for overprovisioning.

The M500 uses overprovisioning, though, so it only offers up 480 GB instead of 512 GB, like the M550

Again, not true.
While technically the difference between GiB and formatted capacity (roughly 7%) is used as work area for the controller, to store the block bitmap, transaction logs, other housekeeping data, and hopefully use some as spare area as you describe, for consumers "overprovisioning" means "the vendor stole some of the GB capacity to use for improved performance and reliability".

http://www.flashmemorysummit.com/English/Collaterals/Proceedings/2012/20120822_TE21_Smith.pdf
Slides 1-6 should help clear it up.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
502 (0.14/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
for consumers "overprovisioning" means "the vendor stole some of the GB capacity to use for improved performance and reliability".

Yeah, but m550 is still using some % of OP for reliability (~1% for RAIN) and some for performance, just like the m500. It's the RAIN percentage that went down with m550, hence giving consumer more usable space. Space for performance is still the same.

So statement "Unlike the M500 Series, no overprovisioning is used, so you do get to use all the space the flash chips provide." can't be correct, because that would mean, there is 0% for RAIN and performance, which is clearly not the case.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 19, 2008
Messages
1,180 (0.21/day)
Location
Australia
Processor Intel i7 4790K
Motherboard Asus Z97 Deluxe
Cooling Thermalright Ultra Extreme 120
Memory Corsair Dominator 1866Mhz 4X4GB
Video Card(s) Asus R290X
Storage Samsung 850 Pro SSD 256GB/Samsung 840 Evo SSD 1TB
Display(s) Samsung S23A950D
Case Corsair 850D
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply Corsair AX850
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 x64
I'm looking at a M500/M550 or 840 Evo in the 1TB variety, cant make up my mind. Looks like the M550 is priced the same as Samsung 840 Evo (1TB) and the M500 will drop in price by $60 or so.
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
502 (0.14/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
I'm looking at a M500/M550 or 840 Evo in the 1TB variety, cant make up my mind.

Go with m500, its dirt cheap right now and EVO just doesn't justify the price premium. And as an added bonus, you get better flash (3x endurance, but thats a non issue anyway even with TLC).

But if you need a "performance" drive and you dont care about $/GB, you're looking at the wrong drives anyway
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,956 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
I'd go with the M500 too, due to its price
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
502 (0.14/day)
System Name Personal Rig
Processor Intel i5 3570K
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling Noctua NH-U12P Push/Pull
Memory 8GB 1600Mhz Vengeance
Video Card(s) Intel HD4000
Storage Seagate 1TB & 180GB Intel 330
Display(s) AOC I2360P
Case Enermax Vostok
Audio Device(s) Onboard realtek
Power Supply Corsair TX650
Mouse Microsoft OEM 2.0
Keyboard Logitech Internet Pro White
Software Legal ;)
Benchmark Scores Very big
Yeah, right now m500 is really a steal (it runs for ~180€ here in EU for 480GB). m550 just doesnt make much sense price wise, as its not _that_ faster than m500.

Maybe if prices come down for m550 or if crucial has some tricks up its sleeve to improve performance (as they did with m4) i see no reason for recommending m550.
 

pinkpanther

New Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
This review is missing one important feature of this ssd, namely the power loss capacitors. The m550 (same as the m500) has power loss capacitors which protects the ssd from data loss in case of a power outage or other unexpected behaviour. Personally, I think that this feature is a huge plus and should be mentioned in the review and conclusion (in the thumbs up list). Althought the EVO is faster than both the m500 and m550, I would always choose the m500/m550 because of the power loss protection. Besides the increased performance of the EVO will not be noticable during day-to-day use for most users. Looking at the price/performance ratio, there is no doubt the m500 is the way to go.
 
Last edited:

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
26,956 (3.71/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5700X
Memory 48 GB
Video Card(s) RTX 4080
Storage 2x HDD RAID 1, 3x M.2 NVMe
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 10 64-bit
This review is missing one important feature of this ssd, namely the power loss capacitors. The m550 (same as the m500) has power loss capacitors which protects the ssd from data loss in case of a power outage or other unexpected behaviour. Personally, I think that this feature is a huge plus and should be mentioned in the review and conclusion (in the thumbs up list). Althought the EVO is faster than both the m500 and m550, I would always choose the m500/m550 because of the power loss protection. Besides the increased performance of the EVO will not be noticable during day-to-day use for most users. Looking at the price/performance ratio, there is no doubt the m500 is the way to go.
Any idea how to test this? Just cutting power seems like a bad idea(tm).
 

pinkpanther

New Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2014
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
Any idea how to test this? Just cutting power seems like a bad idea(tm).
To be honest, I wouldn't know how to test that.
I have read other reviews which mention the power loss protection but none of them actually test this feature
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
746 (0.13/day)
I agree. This is something that TPU could investigate further or even make an exclusive feature (like TheTechReport.com does with their SSD endurance testing). Yours could be "SSD data reliability/retention test" or something similar.

I guess cutting the power as soon as a command is sent to the SSD to write down a file would do it, though I have no idea how to implement that. Perhaps someone who has experience in this area can enlighten us?
 
Top