- Joined
- May 4, 2012
- Messages
- 413 (0.09/day)
Processor | Intel i7 10700K |
---|---|
Motherboard | Gigabyte Z490 Aorus Pro AX |
Cooling | Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 4 |
Memory | DDR4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200MHZ (2X16GB) |
Video Card(s) | Palit GTX1080ti Super JetStream 11GB |
Storage | Trandscend 370s 256GB / WD Caviar Black 2+1TB |
Display(s) | Acer XB270HU 144hz Gsync |
Case | Phanteks Eclipse P600S White |
Audio Device(s) | Sound Blaster ZXR |
Power Supply | Corsair RM1000X 1000W 80 Plus Gold |
So I stumbled upon this review about gaming @4K: http://www.vmodtech.com/en/article/vmodtech-ultimate-gaming-project-4k-battlefield
It's not entirely in English, but you can look at pics and graphs.
They maxed out setting in all games @4K resolution on high-end graphic cards to date. The result is very interesting.
They got 40-50fps at MAX setting (with AA on, of course). So I imagine that IF we turn off the AA, we should be able to get 60fps with no sweats.
So here is my question, do we still need AA at 4K resolution? Since 4K is 4x1080p, so that would equal 4xMSAA, right? I mean, the image quality shouldn't be that much different.
Anyone with 4K monitor, can you show me the screenshots of 4xAA and no AA in-game images?
It's not entirely in English, but you can look at pics and graphs.
They maxed out setting in all games @4K resolution on high-end graphic cards to date. The result is very interesting.
They got 40-50fps at MAX setting (with AA on, of course). So I imagine that IF we turn off the AA, we should be able to get 60fps with no sweats.
So here is my question, do we still need AA at 4K resolution? Since 4K is 4x1080p, so that would equal 4xMSAA, right? I mean, the image quality shouldn't be that much different.
Anyone with 4K monitor, can you show me the screenshots of 4xAA and no AA in-game images?