• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Upgrade to 7700K was a let down!

Joined
May 28, 2005
Messages
4,994 (0.72/day)
Location
South of England
System Name Box of Distraction
Processor Ryzen 7 1800X
Motherboard Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling Custom watercooling
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 2x8GB @ 3466MHz CL14 1T
Video Card(s) EVGA 1080Ti FE. WC'd & TDP limit increased to 360W.
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 500GB & WD Black 2TB storage drive.
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" 1440P 165hz Gsync
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M
Audio Device(s) Phillips Fidelio X2 headphones / basic Bose speakers
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750W G3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 6.0 (mx red switches)
Software Win 10 & Linux Mint
Benchmark Scores https://hwbot.org/user/infrared
The reviews are clear that AMD's new CPU does not game as well as everybody had hoped. AMD even posted yesterday that "There will be patches!!! Ryzen will get better!!"... Seriously.. A patch? AMD had plenty of time to put a whoppin on intel but they released something that you have to fiddle with (Turn some features off) to get it to game right. That is not something I and other want to deal with. Then there is the post about patches... WHY do you have to patch your CPU.. Did you not test it OVER AND OVER again in every aspect of what it will be used for? I am sorry, I was excited for AMD since I had used it for AGES until I went Intel right when the I7-920 was released.

It reminds me of an old mitch hedburg joke "Hey man you are a good cook but can you farm??"

*Sorry tatty I was typing my post before yours popped up*


Ryzen is an entirely new platform from the ground up, it isn't surprising at all that drivers and software need sorting out. It's only been released for 2 days!!!
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
17,779 (2.66/day)
System Name AlderLake / Laptop
Processor Intel i7 12700K P-Cores @ 5Ghz / Intel i3 7100U
Motherboard Gigabyte Z690 Aorus Master / HP 83A3 (U3E1)
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut Extreme + 5 case fans / Fan
Memory 32GB DDR5 Corsair Dominator Platinum RGB 6000MHz CL36 / 8GB DDR4 HyperX CL13
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio / Intel HD620
Storage Samsung 980 Pro 1TB + 970 Evo 500GB + 850 Pro 512GB + 860 Evo 1TB x2 / Samsung 256GB M.2 SSD
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p / 14" 1080p IPS Glossy
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window / HP Pavilion
Audio Device(s) Panasonic SA-PMX94 / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system / Harman Kardon Go + Play / Logitech G533
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W / Powerbrick
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless / Logitech M330 wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless / HP backlit
Software Windows 11 / Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R23 (Single Core) 1936 @ stock Cinebench R23 (Multi Core) 23006 @ stock
Hmm this thread is about a Intel 7700K though...
 
Joined
May 28, 2005
Messages
4,994 (0.72/day)
Location
South of England
System Name Box of Distraction
Processor Ryzen 7 1800X
Motherboard Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling Custom watercooling
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 2x8GB @ 3466MHz CL14 1T
Video Card(s) EVGA 1080Ti FE. WC'd & TDP limit increased to 360W.
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 500GB & WD Black 2TB storage drive.
Display(s) Asus ROG Swift PG278QR 27" 1440P 165hz Gsync
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M
Audio Device(s) Phillips Fidelio X2 headphones / basic Bose speakers
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 750W G3
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cherry MX Board 6.0 (mx red switches)
Software Win 10 & Linux Mint
Benchmark Scores https://hwbot.org/user/infrared
Good point, back on topic, my bad :p
 

de.das.dude

Pro Indian Modder
Joined
Jun 13, 2010
Messages
8,782 (1.74/day)
Location
Stuck in a PC. halp.
System Name Monke | Work Thinkpad| Old Monke
Processor Ryzen 5600X | Ryzen 5500U | FX8320
Motherboard ASRock B550 Extreme4 | ? | Asrock 990FX Extreme 4
Cooling 240mm Rad | Not needed | hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 Corsair RGB | 16 GB DDR4 3600 | 16GB DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX6700XT 12GB | Vega 8 | Sapphire Pulse RX580 8GB
Storage Samsung 980 nvme (Primary) | some samsung SSD
Display(s) Dell 2723DS | Some 14" 1080p 98%sRGB IPS | Dell 2240L
Case Ant Esports Tempered case | Thinkpad | Antec
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z333 | Jabra corpo stuff
Power Supply Corsair RM750e | not needed | Corsair GS 600
Mouse Logitech G400 | nipple
Keyboard Logitech G213 | stock kb is awesome | Logitech K230
VR HMD ;_;
Software Windows 10 Professional x3
Benchmark Scores There are no marks on my bench
Right my expectations were to get a superior single core performance out of 7700k. I am not comparing the argument of two extra cores here. .
Do you realize that other than some shitty games, you will never really face single threaded usage now a days?? Hell, even if you are playing an single threaded game and recoding a video on some threads, you wont see any effect on the game / encoding. Because the OS itself is designed to allow you multitasking instead of the pseudo stuff or time sharing that happened before.
 

Kanan

Tech Enthusiast & Gamer
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
3,517 (1.11/day)
Location
Europe
System Name eazen corp | Xentronon 7.2
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X // PBO max.
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 w/ AM4 kit // 3x Corsair AF140L case fans (2 in, 1 out)
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 2x16 GB DDR4 3600 @ 3800, CL16-19-19-39-58-1T, 1.4 V
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Ti modded to MATRIX // 2000-2100 MHz Core / 1938 MHz G6
Storage Silicon Power P34A80 1TB NVME/Samsung SSD 830 128GB&850 Evo 500GB&F3 1TB 7200RPM/Seagate 2TB 5900RPM
Display(s) Samsung 27" Curved FS2 HDR QLED 1440p/144Hz&27" iiyama TN LED 1080p/120Hz / Samsung 40" IPS 1080p TV
Case Corsair Carbide 600C
Audio Device(s) HyperX Cloud Orbit S / Creative SB X AE-5 @ Logitech Z906 / Sony HD AVR @PC & TV @ Teufel Theater 80
Power Supply EVGA 650 GQ
Mouse Logitech G700 @ Steelseries DeX // Xbox 360 Wireless Controller
Keyboard Corsair K70 LUX RGB /w Cherry MX Brown switches
VR HMD Still nope
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15 095 Time Spy | P29 079 Firestrike | P35 628 3DM11 | X67 508 3DM Vantage Extreme
Ryzen is an entirely new platform from the ground up, it isn't surprising at all that drivers and software need sorting out. It's only been released for 2 days!!!
That's true. Anyone cursing Ryzen now isn't patient, it's too early to say Ryzen is a sub-par performer in games. We will see, and I'm still sure Ryzen is great.

Don't forget every game and even Windows is optimized to Intel / FX CPUs right now, and not really to Ryzen - only a bunch of games are running well, and in those Ryzen is comparable to even the 7700K and better CPUs of Intel (Crysis 3, BF4/BF1/Farcry 4 without SMT and especially Doom).
 
Joined
Apr 13, 2015
Messages
7 (0.00/day)
System Name bono-pc
Processor I7 5820K@4,5GHz
Motherboard MSI X99A Gaming 7
Cooling Cooler Master Nepton 240M with Lepa Bol Quiet PWM
Memory DDR4 DRAM 2666MHz C15 (CMK16GX4M4A2666C15R)
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980Ti GAMING 6G
Storage SSD 256 GB 950 PRO + 2T Seagate
Display(s) LG 34UC88
Case Cooler Master HAF X
Power Supply Corsair AX860
Mouse Steelseries RIVAL
Keyboard Corsair Vengeance K70
Software Windows 10 Pro
Be patient several improvements are coming
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,586 (6.73/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard ASUS TUF x670e
Cooling EK AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 6000Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 4090
Storage WD m.2
Display(s) LG C2 Evo OLED 42"
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic Evo
Audio Device(s) Topping E70 DAC, SMSL SP200 Headphone Amp.
Power Supply FSP Hydro Ti PRO 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk V3 Pro
Keyboard Tester84
Software Windows 11
5820K is at 4.5ghz, ASUS 1080 max OC, and in a newer game like for honor, I get 200-245FPS.

Maybe the 7700K will bring the minimum up.
No.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2017
Messages
131 (0.05/day)
Processor Haswell-E - i7-5820K @ 4.4GHz
Motherboard ASUS X99S
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz
Video Card(s) Palit Super JetStream 980Ti
Storage SSD: 512GB [Crucial MX100] HDD: 34TB [4 x 6TB WD Blue, 2 x 5TB Seagate External]
Display(s) Acer ProDesigner BM320 4K
Case Fractal Design R5
Power Supply Corsair RM750x
As an owner of an X99 system, I don't think it's as stupid as some think.

All fair and well OC'ing a 5820K to reach Skylake/Kaby Lake single core speeds, but an OC'd X99 chip is well known for producing the occasional blue screen of death under heavy load, stable or not (see whea_uncorrectable_error). Then there's the massive increase in power consumption for it.

I've also had trouble on my X99-S board getting the faster M.2 drives to function properly, particularly the Samsung SM951, and I hate the X99 memory training every time the system boots up (due to quad channel). It's something you can turn off granted, but it's not advisable. Speaking of which, it doesn't like those XMP profiles much with the faster speeds. The newer motherboards work flawlessly with quicker memory.

The X99 boards also don't have native USB3.1, at least the ones from 2014/2015.

I could pick all kinds of holes in it, but if i'm being brutally honest unless you are rendering, the X99 platform is a complete waste of space. I naively went from an i5-2400 to an i7-5820K expecting silly speed increases, how wrong was I. Outside of going from a 270x to a 980ti, the only real noteworthy upgrade i've stuck in my computer over the last decade was an SSD.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
1,010 (0.24/day)
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
System Name Intel® X99 Wellsburg
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-5820K - 4.5GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage V E10 (1801)
Cooling EK RGB Monoblock + EK XRES D5 Revo Glass PWM
Memory CMD16GX4M4A2666C15
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon
Storage Samsung 970 EVO PLUS 1TB /850 EVO 1TB / WD Black 2TB
Display(s) Samsung P2450H
Case Lian Li PC-O11 WXC
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply EVGA 1200 P2 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G900 / SS QCK
Keyboard Deck 87 Francium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
As an owner of an X99 system, I don't think it's as stupid as some think.

All fair and well OC'ing a 5820K to reach Skylake/Kaby Lake single core speeds, but an OC'd X99 chip is well known for producing the occasional blue screen of death under heavy load, stable or not (see whea_uncorrectable_error). Then there's the massive increase in power consumption for it.

I've also had trouble on my X99-S board getting the faster M.2 drives to function properly, particularly the Samsung SM951, and I hate the X99 memory training every time the system boots up (due to quad channel). It's something you can turn off granted, but it's not advisable. Speaking of which, it doesn't like those XMP profiles much with the faster speeds. The newer motherboards work flawlessly with quicker memory.

The X99 boards also don't have native USB3.1, at least the ones from 2014/2015.

I could pick all kinds of holes in it, but if i'm being brutally honest unless you are rendering, the X99 platform is a complete waste of space. I naively went from an i5-2400 to an i7-5820K expecting silly speed increases, how wrong was I. Outside of going from a 270x to a 980ti, the only real noteworthy upgrade i've stuck in my computer over the last decade was an SSD.

That's because people overclock too much X99. Some of them keep processors 1000MHz overclocked. 8 cores even 1000+ MHz.
I thin perfect speed for i7-5820K is up to 4.2GHz. Better to overclock up to 1.200-1.250V and less chance for degradation.
I kept i7-5820K first on 4.0GHz, that's nothing for him, he worked on stock voltage, performance are 20% better on 4.0GHz.
Now I increase voltage to 1.200V both Core and Cache and Change settings to 4.2/4.0GHz and I will keep like that constantly.
Maybe and my processor could work on 4.5GHz on 1.300-1.350V but I didn't push him, this is enough until Intel X299.
Even if Intel fail with LGA2066, people with X99 have enough performance to wait Intel to develope completely new gen or eventually to think about AM4 1800X.
But if Intel launch something good than I expect X299 to be great platform. Rumors say Skylake-E up to 10 cores and Kaby Lake-E 4 cores. That mean maybe people could choose between processor for multi threaded application and CPU with 4 cores but high frequency, on same chipset. Maybe is not bad idea. But everything is in vain if Intel ask more than 300-350 for 1700X competition and more than 500-550 for 1800X competition. Higher power consumption, more expensive motherboards, many customers will turn to AMD in that case.
Intel must beat 1800X for same price, no matter how, 6 or 8 cores.
For me is X99 platform best after X58. X58 was best investment and for most people best platform in life. People still use Xeons and i7-980X. Many customers both i7-920 and later upgrade to i7-980X. Only X99 is in shadow of AMD now, but without AMD that would be premium platform 2014-2015-2016 and now is 2017. In August 2014 Intel present i7-5820K and ASUS Rampage V Extreme, they are still premium Intel platform and X99 will stay attractive and capable to keep high end hardware up to 2020. That's long life time. People have many options, price of used 8 and 10 cores will rapidly drop after Intel launch X299. Maybe Intel keep their price on Amazon and Newegg, but i7-6950X will cost soon 500$ and no one will pay single dollar over that, special if Intel move little more with LGA2066. i7-6900K and i7-6950X if replace i7-5820K and i7-5930K could seriously to prolongue life time of X99. Owners could freely to invest in some watercooling and no reason to change chipset. Not even on X299.
Overclocked i7-6900K with Cache on 4.0GHz and clock on 4.2GHz is better than best AMD option, CPU and Memory results. And owners of X99 could continue to use 3 years old platform. Only problem is Intel's price. Intel could stay competitive and with so strong AMD, only price is problem.
Their answer should be changing price on X79 level, i7-6900K to cost as i7-4930K and i7-6950X as i7-4960X, I7-6850K same as mainstream generation and i7-6800K 200$ budget variant and Intel is in game again. He dominate in memory even with 2666-3200MHz copy-write-read performance as well. Extraction, unpacking, everything is faster on X99 with overclocked Cache + Core, premium motherboards with better VRM and power section, more options.
 
Last edited:

FireFox

The Power Of Intel
Joined
Feb 19, 2014
Messages
7,507 (2.02/day)
Location
Germany
Processor Intel i7 10700K
Motherboard Asus ROG Maximus XII Hero
Cooling 2x Black Ice Nemesis GTX 480 - 1x Black Ice Nemesis GTX 420 - D5 VPP655P - 13x Corsair LL120 - LL140
Memory 32GB G.SKILL Trident Z RGB 3600Hz
Video Card(s) EVGA GEFORCE RTX 3080 XC3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 970 EVO PLUS 500GB/1TB - WD Blue SN550 1TB - 2 X WD Blue 1TB - 3 X WD Black 1TB
Display(s) Asus ROG PG278QR 2560x1440 144Hz (Overclocked 165Hz )/ Samsung
Case Corsair Obsidian 1000D
Audio Device(s) I prefer Gaming-Headset
Power Supply Enermax MaxTytan 1250W 80+ Titanium
Mouse Logitech G502 spectrum
Keyboard Virtuis Advanced Gaming Keyboard ( Batboard )
Software Windows 10 Enterprise/Windows 10 Pro/Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores My PC runs FiFA
That's because people overclock too much X99. Some of them keep processors 1000MHz overclocked. 8 cores even 1000+ MHz.
I thin perfect speed for i7-5820K is up to 4.2GHz. Better to overclock up to 1.200-1.250V and less chance for degradation.
I kept i7-5820K first on 4.0GHz, that's nothing for him, he worked on stock voltage, performance are 20% better on 4.0GHz.
Now I increase voltage to 1.200V both Core and Cache and Change settings to 4.2/4.0GHz and I will keep like that constantly.
Maybe and my processor could work on 4.5GHz on 1.300-1.350V but I didn't push him, this is enough until Intel X299.
Even if Intel fail with LGA2066, people with X99 have enough performance to wait Intel to develope completely new gen or eventually to think about AM4 1800X.
But if Intel launch something good than I expect X299 to be great platform. Rumors say Skylake-E up to 10 cores and Kaby Lake-E 4 cores. That mean maybe people could choose between processor for multi threaded application and CPU with 4 cores but high frequency, on same chipset. Maybe is not bad idea. But everything is in vain if Intel ask more than 300-350 for 1700X competition and more than 500-550 for 1800X competition. Higher power consumption, more expensive motherboards, many customers will turn to AMD in that case.
Intel must beat 1800X for same price, no matter how, 6 or 8 cores.
For me is X99 platform best after X58. X58 was best investment and for most people best platform in life. People still use Xeons and i7-980X. Many customers both i7-920 and later upgrade to i7-980X. Only X99 is in shadow of AMD now, but without AMD that would be premium platform 2014-2015-2016 and now is 2017. In August 2014 Intel present i7-5820K and ASUS Rampage V Extreme, they are still premium Intel platform and X99 will stay attractive and capable to keep high end hardware up to 2020. That's long life time. People have many options, price of used 8 and 10 cores will rapidly drop after Intel launch X299. Maybe Intel keep their price on Amazon and Newegg, but i7-6950X will cost soon 500$ and no one will pay single dollar over that, special if Intel move little more with LGA2066. i7-6900K and i7-6950X if replace i7-5820K and i7-5930K could seriously to prolongue life time of X99. Owners could freely to invest in some watercooling and no reason to change chipset. Not even on X299.
Overclocked i7-6900K with Cache on 4.0GHz and clock on 4.2GHz is better than best AMD option, CPU and Memory results. And owners of X99 could continue to use 3 years old platform. Only problem is Intel's price. Intel could stay competitive and with so strong AMD, only price is problem.
Their answer should be changing price on X79 level, i7-6900K to cost as i7-4930K and i7-6950X as i7-4960X, I7-6850K same as mainstream generation and i7-6800K 200$ budget variant and Intel is in game again. He dominate in memory even with 2666-3200MHz copy-write-read performance as well. Extraction, unpacking, everything is faster on X99 with overclocked Cache + Core, premium motherboards with better VRM and power section, more options.

It would take me less time to read the full story of the Bible than your post:p

Btw, I had a nice read.
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
1,010 (0.24/day)
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
System Name Intel® X99 Wellsburg
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-5820K - 4.5GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage V E10 (1801)
Cooling EK RGB Monoblock + EK XRES D5 Revo Glass PWM
Memory CMD16GX4M4A2666C15
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon
Storage Samsung 970 EVO PLUS 1TB /850 EVO 1TB / WD Black 2TB
Display(s) Samsung P2450H
Case Lian Li PC-O11 WXC
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply EVGA 1200 P2 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G900 / SS QCK
Keyboard Deck 87 Francium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
It would take me less time to read the full story of the Bible than your post:p

Btw, I had a nice read.

It's only for 1/3 longer than his post.
Nobody force you to read.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
11,878 (2.31/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo/ Asus strix scar II
Processor Amd R5 5900X/ Intel 8750H
Motherboard Crosshair hero8 impact/Asus
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu ek suprim Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in four sticks./16Gb/16GB
Video Card(s) Powercolour RX7900XT Reference/Rtx 2060
Storage Silicon power 2TB nvme/8Tb external/1Tb samsung Evo nvme 2Tb sata ssd/1Tb nvme
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync.dell shiter
Case Lianli 011 dynamic/strix scar2
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi/Asus stock
Mouse Roccat Kova/ Logitech G wireless
Keyboard Roccat Aimo 120
VR HMD Oculus rift
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy/ laptop Timespy 6506
Right my expectations were to get a superior single core performance out of 7700k. I am not comparing the argument of two extra cores here. .
Why wouldn't you with all the tripe spoken on the internet about the 7700k s gaming prowess ?? And now some call you wtf..
Comedy abounds in Tpu land.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,402 (0.29/day)
Location
Romania
Processor Ryzen 5700x
Motherboard MSI B350 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling be quiet dark rock pro 3
Memory GSKill Aegis 32GB (4x8GB) DDR4 3200MHz CL16
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon RX 7800 XT Hellhound 16GB GDDR6 256-bit
Storage Seagate Barracuda SATA-II 1TB , HyperX Savage 240GB SATA 3
Display(s) Benq EX2780Q
Case Be Quiet! Dark Base Pro 900
Audio Device(s) Sound BlasterX G6
Power Supply Seasonic prime TX-650
Mouse Marvo Scorpion G981
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow Elite - Yellow Switch
Software Windows 10 Pro
Right my expectations were to get a superior single core performance out of 7700k.
This.

I think it will shine in the upcoming games . ashes of singularity should score more with your rig.
Keep us updated. Still nice build
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2008
Messages
210 (0.04/day)
System Name Black Magic
Processor Intel Core i9 13900K
Motherboard MSI MPG Z790I EDGE WIFI MB
Cooling Noctua NH-U12s-CH-BK Chromax Black CPU Cooler
Memory G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB 64GB
Video Card(s) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity 24GB
Storage Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe Gen3 NVMe M.2 SSD - 2TB
Display(s) (Main) LG 38WN95C-W 38 Inch UltraWide QHD+ IPS (other is 27 AOC)
Case Fractal Design Torrent Nano RGB Black Mini ITX Case
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster X3 Hi-Res 7.1 External USB DAC and Amp
Power Supply Corsair RM850x 850W Power Supply
Mouse Logitech G G903 LIGHTSPEED
Keyboard ROCCAT ROC-12-671-RD-AM Vulcan 121 Aimo RGB Mechanical Gaming Keyboard
Software Microsoft Windows 11
Benchmark Scores nil
looks like you got punkt by all the hype...my 920 @4.4 is just as good 5 plus years ago....what did you really expect..
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.71/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
looks like you got punkt by all the hype...my 920 @4.4 is just as good 5 plus years ago....what did you really expect..
Funny... my 486 dx4 100mhz is just as good as it was 22 years ago. That doesnt mean it can play today's games as well as the latest gen cpu.

The fact is your cpu is holding a lot of games back just because its slow compared to the latest gen or two. Your cpu places a glass ceiling on many titles without even using a high end gpu...

While your statement is true as it reads, when put in context, the chip is pretty played out. ;)

But, OP did get punked. :p
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,225 (1.70/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Funny... my 486 dx4 100mhz is just as good as it was 22 years ago. That doesnt mean it can play today's games as well as the latest gen cpu.

The fact is your cpu is holding a lot of games back just because its slow compared to the latest gen or two. Your cpu places a glass ceiling on many titles without even using a high end gpu...

While your statement is true as it reads, when put in context, the chip is pretty played out. ;)

But, OP did get punked. :p
that chip was awesome.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
2,826 (1.00/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASRock X670E Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 Chromax
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4090 Trio
Storage Too much
Display(s) Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Topping DX5, DCA Aeon II
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w
Mouse G305
Keyboard Wooting HE60
VR HMD Valve Index
Software Win 10
Should have waited for Ryzen. The 7700K gets you an imperceivable FPS boost that you won't see with anything but a 240 Hz monitor. Ryzen will give you a boost in literally everything but games and that''s only for now as we sure as heck know games are going to require more cores over time. The only acceptable reason to be buying a 7700K right now is if you are a hardcore / pro gamer. For everyone else, Ryzen is the best choice not just for it's all around performance now but because it absolutely crushes the 7700K in the future thanks to it's additional cores. Being able to drop in Zen+ and Zen++ into the same mobo is a nice thing to note.
 
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Messages
522 (0.17/day)
Location
Beachy Gulf Beach
System Name RadActive Dragon & Black Dragon
Processor i7 5960X & 1090T
Motherboard Gigabyte X99-UD3P & Asus Sabertooth 990FX
Cooling EK EVO & Corsair H50
Memory GSkill TridentZ 32GBs 3200MHz & Vegeance 8GBs 1600MHz
Video Card(s) 2x 980Ti & 960 FTW
Storage Samsung Pro 256GB & Intel 120GB
Case Heavy modded Haf X & NZXT Apollo
Power Supply AX1200 & AX1200i
Software Windows 7 & Ubuntu 15.04
I'm curious, why go from a X99 to Z270?
The small percentage is just not going to be noticeable in every day usage. Unless, there were features on the Z270 you wanted.

Heck, I have several CPUs. Some of them hardly have a difference unless you doing some crazy work loads on them. There are far greater difference in features on the motherboard.
 

Kanan

Tech Enthusiast & Gamer
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
3,517 (1.11/day)
Location
Europe
System Name eazen corp | Xentronon 7.2
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X // PBO max.
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 w/ AM4 kit // 3x Corsair AF140L case fans (2 in, 1 out)
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 2x16 GB DDR4 3600 @ 3800, CL16-19-19-39-58-1T, 1.4 V
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Ti modded to MATRIX // 2000-2100 MHz Core / 1938 MHz G6
Storage Silicon Power P34A80 1TB NVME/Samsung SSD 830 128GB&850 Evo 500GB&F3 1TB 7200RPM/Seagate 2TB 5900RPM
Display(s) Samsung 27" Curved FS2 HDR QLED 1440p/144Hz&27" iiyama TN LED 1080p/120Hz / Samsung 40" IPS 1080p TV
Case Corsair Carbide 600C
Audio Device(s) HyperX Cloud Orbit S / Creative SB X AE-5 @ Logitech Z906 / Sony HD AVR @PC & TV @ Teufel Theater 80
Power Supply EVGA 650 GQ
Mouse Logitech G700 @ Steelseries DeX // Xbox 360 Wireless Controller
Keyboard Corsair K70 LUX RGB /w Cherry MX Brown switches
VR HMD Still nope
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15 095 Time Spy | P29 079 Firestrike | P35 628 3DM11 | X67 508 3DM Vantage Extreme
I'm curious, why go from a X99 to Z270?
The small percentage is just not going to be noticeable in every day usage. Unless, there were features on the Z270 you wanted.

Heck, I have several CPUs. Some of them hardly have a difference unless you doing some crazy work loads on them. There are far greater difference in features on the motherboard.
I'd never step down from a ~more or less same gen X platform to a Z platform. I even prefer X79 compared to Z270. For obvious reasons.
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
2,067 (0.40/day)
System Name The Stone that the Builders Refused / iJayo
Processor R5 1600/ R7 3700X
Motherboard Asrock AB350 Pro4 / Asus Rog Strix B450-F gaming
Cooling Cryorig M9 / Noctua NH-D14
Memory G skill 16 Gigs ddr4 / 16 gigs PNY ddr4
Video Card(s) Nvdia GTX 660 / Nvidia RTX 2070 Super
Storage 120gig 840 evo, 120gig adata sp900 / 1tb Mushkin M.2 ssd 1 & 3 tb seagate hdd, 120 gig Hyper X ssd
Display(s) 42" Nec retail display monitor/ 34" Dell curved 165hz monitor
Case Pink Enermax Ostrog / Phanteks Enthoo Evolv Tempered Glass edition
Audio Device(s) Altec Lansing Expressionist Bass/ M-Audio monitors
Power Supply Corsair450 / Be Quiet Dark Power Pro 650
Mouse corsair vengence M65 / Zalman Knossos
Keyboard corsair k95 / Roccat Vulcan 121
Software Window 10 pro / Windows 10 pro
Benchmark Scores meh... feel me on the battle field!
...thought this was a joke....
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.71/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
I'd never step down from a ~more or less same gen X platform to a Z platform. I even prefer X79 compared to Z270. For obvious reasons.
You own it. :)

If one uses all the cores (read more than 4), that stance makes sense. But the gap between them isnt as big as one may think either...if tbere is still one. There are four generations of incremental IPC improvements totaling 20%-25% clock for clock. Then the 7700k is a 5ghz chip versus say, a 4.5ghz 3960x... Way less power use, dont need the non-existent improvements quad core ram brings, modern technology like nvme (or if you get a pcie card, booting from nvme), native usb3.1....etc. :)
 

Kanan

Tech Enthusiast & Gamer
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
3,517 (1.11/day)
Location
Europe
System Name eazen corp | Xentronon 7.2
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X // PBO max.
Motherboard Asus TUF Gaming X570-Plus
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 SE2011 w/ AM4 kit // 3x Corsair AF140L case fans (2 in, 1 out)
Memory G.Skill Trident Z RGB 2x16 GB DDR4 3600 @ 3800, CL16-19-19-39-58-1T, 1.4 V
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Ti modded to MATRIX // 2000-2100 MHz Core / 1938 MHz G6
Storage Silicon Power P34A80 1TB NVME/Samsung SSD 830 128GB&850 Evo 500GB&F3 1TB 7200RPM/Seagate 2TB 5900RPM
Display(s) Samsung 27" Curved FS2 HDR QLED 1440p/144Hz&27" iiyama TN LED 1080p/120Hz / Samsung 40" IPS 1080p TV
Case Corsair Carbide 600C
Audio Device(s) HyperX Cloud Orbit S / Creative SB X AE-5 @ Logitech Z906 / Sony HD AVR @PC & TV @ Teufel Theater 80
Power Supply EVGA 650 GQ
Mouse Logitech G700 @ Steelseries DeX // Xbox 360 Wireless Controller
Keyboard Corsair K70 LUX RGB /w Cherry MX Brown switches
VR HMD Still nope
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15 095 Time Spy | P29 079 Firestrike | P35 628 3DM11 | X67 508 3DM Vantage Extreme
You own it. :)

If one uses all the cores (read more than 4), that stance makes sense. But the gap between them isnt as big as one may think either...if tbere is still one. There are four generations of incremental IPC improvements totaling 20%-25% clock for clock. Then the 7700k is a 5ghz chip versus say, a 4.5ghz 3960x... Way less power use, dont need the non-existent improvements quad core ram brings, modern technology like nvme (or if you get a pcie card, booting from nvme), native usb3.1....etc. :)
Its true, if someone offered me a free 7700K i would probably go for it. Then again my 3960X clocks higher than 5GHz if I'd care to do it. But I'm not into retarded overclocks for long term usage. My statement wasn't meant like that however. In the end I don't get a free 7700K and buying it to replace my 3960X is simply not worth it. Atm. I'm still fine, though I get a GPU upgrade soon and I'm curious if it will be fine with the 3960X at 4.5GHz. That said I plan to use it for a few years at least, maybe 4 years tops. Maybe Ryzen II is a thing then, the alternative would be to buy a Intel 8 core on a future X platform (I don't like the mainstream platform, again for obvious reasons).
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.71/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
I doubt there are many 5ghz 24/7 3960x out there...just talking 24/7 clocks.

Anyhoo, i get your point... reading between the lines you use all those cores i guess. :)

Youll have the same minor glass ceiling any SB based cpu has with a highdr end gpu. More cores wont help that. ;)
 
Top