- Joined
- Apr 7, 2007
- Messages
- 196 (0.03/day)
- Location
- Paris
Processor | E6700@3447 (383.1*9)24/7; 3735(415*9)for benchies |
---|---|
Motherboard | P5B dlx |
Cooling | Zalman cnps 9700 led; 1Thermaltake enlobel 120mm; 1Noctua 120 and 2NZXT 120 mm case fans |
Memory | Corsair Twinx 2Go Pc6400c4 @ 478.9 4-4-4-12 |
Video Card(s) | hd 2900 xt @850/1050 |
Storage | 400G Seagate; 75Go WD raptor (system disk) |
Display(s) | Sony h70 |
Case | Modded NZXT apollo |
Audio Device(s) | Sound Blaster X-FI audio / Altec 2.1 |
Power Supply | Enermax Infinity 720W |
Software | XP pro sp2 |
Benchmark Scores | 3DMark=12907 |
Just been perusing through a batch of 3dmark tests I've been running on my 2900 xt @ 847.53/999 (amd gpu tool showing 850/1007-optimistic as usual) and 7.9 cats are lower in 3d03 and 3d05 than 7.8 ...........any one notice that???? However 3d06 is better with the 7.9 cats....
Strange.......'cause the 7.8 cats were definitely a step ahead.
Strange.......'cause the 7.8 cats were definitely a step ahead.