- Joined
- Mar 9, 2006
- Messages
- 1,203 (0.18/day)
- Location
- FL
System Name | Iam-a-computah |
---|---|
Processor | i9 9900k @5 Ghz |
Motherboard | Gigabyte Auros z390x |
Cooling | Custom water loop, x2 280 radiators |
Memory | 16gb Corsair Dominator |
Video Card(s) | MSI 1080 TI FE 11gb WC |
Storage | SSD: 256gb Samsung 840pro & HHD: WD black 2T |
Display(s) | LG 34" UW screen |
Case | EVGA DG-86 |
Audio Device(s) | Creative x-FI |
Power Supply | EVGA super NOVA 1300wtt |
Keyboard | G710 |
Software | W 10 |
Im in the market for a new CPU, and i was really looking forward to get the Q6600, then i saw that the new e8400 came out and ppl were even selling their current q6600 to get e8400. I wondered if i should just get the 8400, but i started to think and aksed myself "isnt the q6600 more future proof?", because right now i know only some applications uses the the 4 cores and that in the future the support will get better. Also is the performance of the e8400 noticeable higher than the q6600?