• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

GPs in RAID0

Franklinwallbrown

New Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
1,228 (0.21/day)
System Name Gaming Lappy
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo Processor P8400 (2.26GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 3MB L2 cache)
Motherboard unknown?
Cooling Stock
Memory 4GB DDR3 800MHz (2 x 2GB)/unknown manufacterer?
Video Card(s) 9800m GTS
Storage Seagate Momentus 7200.2 200GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0
Display(s) "Generic PnP Monitor"? 1920x1200
Case FX Design with Copper Core Accent
Audio Device(s) Conexant High Def SmartAudio 221
Power Supply 9 Cell
Software OS: Windows Vista SP1 (64bit)
You guys think that the WD GPs would be any good if you put them in RAID0. I would assume that you would get better than a 10k HDD speed, but half the power consumption along with WAY less noise and WAY less heat. What do you think? (I'm looking for articles on the subject, but I'm not being very successful)
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
2,190 (0.38/day)
Location
Minnesota, USA
System Name TaichiTig
Processor i7 6800K
Motherboard ASRock X99 Taichi
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) RTX 4070
Storage SSD + Misc. HDDs in DrivePool
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U, Samsung C32HG70
Case Antec Twelve Hundred
Audio Device(s) Behringer UMC404HD, LSR308, Shure SRH840, AKG K612, Etymotic HF5
Power Supply Corsair 750TX
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Deck Legend Ice Tactile
Software Win10
Depending on your RAID controller, two GPs in RAID 0 should offer better throughput than a Raptor and similar or better throughput than a Velociraptor. 10k drives will generally offer better access times than GPs in RAID 0 of course.

As for heat and power consumption, however, two GPs will use more power and generate more heat overall, than one 10,000rpm drive, especially the Velociraptor. It's less concentrated, but overall more.

Personally ... yes, I would prefer two GPs in RAID 0 over one 10,000rpm drive. But that's mostly due to cost. Between seek times, transfer rates, and varying drives within each type, the GPs in RAID 0 will trade blows with 10k drives when it comes to performance, with each winning some battles. It depends on what you're using it for.

This is just my second post here, but I hope it helps. :) I don't have any hard data so the only source I have to reference is that I build custom computers professionally. :)
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
2,190 (0.38/day)
Location
Minnesota, USA
System Name TaichiTig
Processor i7 6800K
Motherboard ASRock X99 Taichi
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) RTX 4070
Storage SSD + Misc. HDDs in DrivePool
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U, Samsung C32HG70
Case Antec Twelve Hundred
Audio Device(s) Behringer UMC404HD, LSR308, Shure SRH840, AKG K612, Etymotic HF5
Power Supply Corsair 750TX
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Deck Legend Ice Tactile
Software Win10
Access times often are a lot more noticeable, plus, RAID 0 offers extra risks of losing data. Either due to array failure or drive failure.

....for which reason I'd recommend Matrix RAID, with a RAID 0 array for performance needs and a RAID 1 array for important data. :toast:

That still leaves the 10k drives winning for access times, of course.
 

Franklinwallbrown

New Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
1,228 (0.21/day)
System Name Gaming Lappy
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo Processor P8400 (2.26GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 3MB L2 cache)
Motherboard unknown?
Cooling Stock
Memory 4GB DDR3 800MHz (2 x 2GB)/unknown manufacterer?
Video Card(s) 9800m GTS
Storage Seagate Momentus 7200.2 200GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0
Display(s) "Generic PnP Monitor"? 1920x1200
Case FX Design with Copper Core Accent
Audio Device(s) Conexant High Def SmartAudio 221
Power Supply 9 Cell
Software OS: Windows Vista SP1 (64bit)
What about 0+1?

What about sound?
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
2,190 (0.38/day)
Location
Minnesota, USA
System Name TaichiTig
Processor i7 6800K
Motherboard ASRock X99 Taichi
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) RTX 4070
Storage SSD + Misc. HDDs in DrivePool
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U, Samsung C32HG70
Case Antec Twelve Hundred
Audio Device(s) Behringer UMC404HD, LSR308, Shure SRH840, AKG K612, Etymotic HF5
Power Supply Corsair 750TX
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Deck Legend Ice Tactile
Software Win10
I'm using Matrix RAID with four 1TB Ultrastar drives in a 558GB RAID 0 array and a 1721GB RAID 10 array, and consider it a great solution for both performance and redundancy.

Four GP drives on a Matrix RAID controller, I imagine, would run 250-300MB/sec sustained transfer speeds with a ~9 second access time, on the RAID 0 array. And in RAID 10, I would guess, should hit around 125MB/sec sustained and ~12ms access time. Both arrays would beat a Raptor or Velociraptor by a wide margin in throughput and lose by a few milliseconds in access time. Noise would be likely lower than with a Raptor and higher than a Velociraptor. This is all speculation, but fairly educated speculation. :p

Hope it helps! :)
 
Last edited:

Franklinwallbrown

New Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
1,228 (0.21/day)
System Name Gaming Lappy
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo Processor P8400 (2.26GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 3MB L2 cache)
Motherboard unknown?
Cooling Stock
Memory 4GB DDR3 800MHz (2 x 2GB)/unknown manufacterer?
Video Card(s) 9800m GTS
Storage Seagate Momentus 7200.2 200GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0
Display(s) "Generic PnP Monitor"? 1920x1200
Case FX Design with Copper Core Accent
Audio Device(s) Conexant High Def SmartAudio 221
Power Supply 9 Cell
Software OS: Windows Vista SP1 (64bit)
Well, the GP is $70 for 500GB. So, I don't know if you can beat 2TB that is faster than a Velociraptor. What about random seek times?
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
2,190 (0.38/day)
Location
Minnesota, USA
System Name TaichiTig
Processor i7 6800K
Motherboard ASRock X99 Taichi
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) RTX 4070
Storage SSD + Misc. HDDs in DrivePool
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U, Samsung C32HG70
Case Antec Twelve Hundred
Audio Device(s) Behringer UMC404HD, LSR308, Shure SRH840, AKG K612, Etymotic HF5
Power Supply Corsair 750TX
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Deck Legend Ice Tactile
Software Win10
If you were just going to make one huge RAID 0 array across those GPs, a Velociraptor would put a serious hurting on them when it comes to access and seek times. The average access time across the entire 2TB array would probably approach double that of a Velociraptor (~7ms).

However, if you did create a, say, 150GB RAID 0 array at the beginning of the drives, the access times for that array would come down to within a few milliseconds of the Velociraptor, with 3-4x the Velociraptor's throughput. The Velociraptor would still be "snappier" in Windows and programs, but the four-drive RAID 0 array would offer more overall muscle for things like video editing.

I'd rather have the muscle than the snappy response, personally.

With a small RAID 0 array at the beginning of the drives, you can then have your RAID 10 for important data.

Hope it helps. :)
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
2,190 (0.38/day)
Location
Minnesota, USA
System Name TaichiTig
Processor i7 6800K
Motherboard ASRock X99 Taichi
Memory 32GB DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) RTX 4070
Storage SSD + Misc. HDDs in DrivePool
Display(s) BenQ PD3200U, Samsung C32HG70
Case Antec Twelve Hundred
Audio Device(s) Behringer UMC404HD, LSR308, Shure SRH840, AKG K612, Etymotic HF5
Power Supply Corsair 750TX
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Deck Legend Ice Tactile
Software Win10
The problem with RAID 5 is it requires a fair amount of overhead to calculate parity, so unless you have a nice hardware controller, the performance won't be great. It will give you 17-25% more overall drive capacity than RAID 10, but for enhanced speed and peace of mind, I think RAID 10 is worth it.

Hope it helps! :)
 

Franklinwallbrown

New Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
1,228 (0.21/day)
System Name Gaming Lappy
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo Processor P8400 (2.26GHz, 1066MHz FSB, 3MB L2 cache)
Motherboard unknown?
Cooling Stock
Memory 4GB DDR3 800MHz (2 x 2GB)/unknown manufacterer?
Video Card(s) 9800m GTS
Storage Seagate Momentus 7200.2 200GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0
Display(s) "Generic PnP Monitor"? 1920x1200
Case FX Design with Copper Core Accent
Audio Device(s) Conexant High Def SmartAudio 221
Power Supply 9 Cell
Software OS: Windows Vista SP1 (64bit)
AH, W/E. I'll just one of my 36gb Raptors for my OS and maybe get a Velociraptor for games and a GP for storage.
 
Top