- Joined
- Oct 6, 2004
- Messages
- 58,413 (8.21/day)
- Location
- Oystralia
System Name | Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load) |
---|---|
Processor | Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core) |
Motherboard | Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded) |
Cooling | Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate |
Memory | 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V) |
Video Card(s) | Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W)) |
Storage | 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2 |
Display(s) | Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144) |
Case | Fractal Design R6 |
Audio Device(s) | Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic |
Power Supply | Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY) |
Mouse | Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL |
Keyboard | Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps) |
VR HMD | Oculus Rift S + Quest 2 |
Software | Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware! |
Benchmark Scores | Nyooom. |
For example 3dmark06, his cpu score at default settings was only about 100 or so points better than mine, me at default settings as well ofcourse. Meaning it is slightly quicker clock for clock. However reason why they score soo much higher overall is because while the Phenoms tend to crap out after 3.0 GHz, the Q6600 will go close or even up to and past 4.0 GHz.
I recall when i upgraded my media PC into my lan rig, i found out my FX-62 was 95% of the speed of my Q6600 at stock settings, even in synthetics. That surprised a lot of people.
My findings were the same as yours, in that my 2.4GHz quad OC'd to 3.6GHz, while my 2.8GHz FX62 crapped out at 3GHz, leaving the intel far, far in the lead.
its overclocking where intel is better, not at stock.