Recent content by Anonimo

Well, almost everyone here enjoyed your reviews, we all will miss them. But I don't think you made a bad decision because, well... I wouldn't like to use my entire life doing reviews. Best wishes from your unknown known.

The Imation SSD stutters. The Patriot thing uses a Phison controler, that i've never heard about... And I don't think the Pci-e thing will give you any noticeable increase in performance. By the way, if you can afford this: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820167016, it...

TPU could add min values to the game graphs, as they often tell you if it is playable, barely playable, unplayable, etc.

The controller is from Indilinx, so yes, it is a good drive.

I was wondering how much it would take to someone do it, cause, as far I know, USB 3 is faster than SATA 2. I wonder if latency will be affected

Wizz~ I think you should put the min FPs in the graphs too, like xBit do. It would be a nice add 'cause it can show if the game is playable or not.

So why ATI made the Rv700 with two GPUs instead of a single 512mm² die? I am not disagreeing with you, it is not a rhetorical question, I just want to know :) EDIT: Oh, just saw the FordGT post, yeah, probably because it would be freaking hot

A 40nm wafer costs more than a 55nm, so Cypress costs a bit more to produce than Rv770, but probably much less than 2x Rv770 About Fermi, dunno, I'm really confident about this chip, think it's going to be much faster than current chips. And I think it's performance per mm² will be at least...

What did he say?

Looks much better than the reference (not that it is ugly). There is a contest to win it, too bad it is only for UK : (

I were expecting much more from this card, I thought it was at least as fast as the HD 4870 X2, like it was with HD 4870 x HD 3870 X2. Of course it was an improvement in power, but you must remember that it is 40nm vs. 55nm, unlike HD 4870, that was 55nm x 55nm Edit:; Well, there must be...

Oh god, stop saying "it would be much better with more bandwidht", "BIG CHIPS NEED BIG BANDWIDHT" or " MOAR BITS IS FOR THE WIN". No one here knows how more bandwidht would affect the performance. Also, ATI engineers are not dumb, they built the chip, they know how much bandwidht the chip...

GT216: - More shader power than 8800GTX with the same architeture, but more SPs - Less die size (because 40nm) - But less bandwidht They are using more die size to put more useless shaders?! Even with GDDR5, it would have the SAME bandwidht as the 8800GTX, but with much more Shader Power...

Brazil... What can I do if I have a poor english? : P

Yeah, with GDDR5, at 3600Mhz it would has 86,5Gb/s. Then I think would be at least almost enough. But if it has more shaders then the G80-GTX, probably it will request more bandwidth. (Why they would do a more powerful shader gpu that is weak because have less texture power?)