Recent content by KooKKiK

ok, show me the real power consumption test and i will believe you. not that old and completely wrong argument repeating again. :banghead:

TDP doesn't stand for the 'REAL' power consumption. and both companies do not measure TDP in the same way. that is my point. hope you understand.

you can't have nVidia card at its maximum power because power limiter will cut off anything before reaching that point. look at the Furmark test of GTX680 by Wizz and compare to the gaming test you see a difference between Furmark and gaming test of 680 compared to 7970 ???

No. You don't understand. for AMD, TDP means the maximum power that can be delivered to graphic board. but for nVidia, TDP means power that limited by their power limiter. take a look at HD6970 that has 250W TDP VS GTX580 244W TDP how on earth that 6970 has higher power consumption than the...

AMD and nVidia doesn't measure TDP in the same way.

So, why they sold Imageon ???

and what about the original 7970 ???

High factory OC Extreme manual OC Low fan noise Good power management All at reasonable price but only 8.9 for this... ARE U KIDDING ME ??!!??!!??

nope, thats all same argument ( as i told you "already said" ) ;) and you havent answered me about the photograph either ;) ps. got beaten by ( 5746 ( from your score ) - 4905 ) / 4905 = 17.14% in favoring benchmark. ok, thats really competitive for me :laugh:

already said ;) and have a flagship got beaten by at least 15%, thats "EATEN ALIVE" for me ( even 580 cant beat 6970 by this far )

ok ok, THE 680M gonna beat 7970 even the desktop version. dream on, boy :laugh:

they had a photograph of 3dmark screen. maybe they had a card but didnt know what spec it is, who knows ??? but that screen look very real for me, more real than BS spec. and your way to normalized is to multiply 6500 point of 7870 by 85 percent ??!!?? oh boy, cant stop laughing :roll...

WTF !!! :wtf: i didnt say a word about that damn SPs. all i concern is about 3dmark score, and that look 'real' for me. who care about SPs you dumbASS :laugh: ps. and you normalized a underclock 7870 to 7850 level ( with such a detailed score of 5525 :wtf: ) oh yeah, thats...

not to believe from user review. thats ok for me. but... where did you get that 5500 score from ??? an official review ??? HA-HA-HA :laugh: and yeah, WE WILL SEE ;)

http://forum.notebookreview.com/gaming-software-graphics-cards/658185-amd-7970m-vs-gtx-680m-2.html#post8460234 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: ps. dont forget 3dmark11 at low res. prefer Kepler than AMD stuff. ;)