Exactly
But to me this just seems absolutely ludacris that AMD would overlook performance on such a popular game...
Yep PCIe 4.0 was overall better, but there is still an unexplainable low performance, compared to the hardware.
You can thank some random dude on YouTube. Thing is, my performance is still up and down - it helped with the no DX9 Extra command but yeah.. Something is def' off. Some kind of featureset that isn't running optimally on there cards :/
Okay big update, I have totally discarded this launch option before because I didn't think a dx9 disable command would have ANY impact on just 1 map, the newest CSGO map in the competetive map pool mind you.
-disable_d3d9ex
This launch command totally negates all bad performance in CSGO on AMD...
I don't have much room for UBM at all. They don't make sense to me.
Well when I am running on a 5600X+6600XT on FHD high'ish settings with 80-200 FPS on ancient - I consider it low FPS.
I don't really play anything else but CS, and the worst part is that I bought literally 10 pieces of A520 and 6600XT with the intention of selling it is a CS:GO oriented PC, a PC I would use myself. But at this point, I really cannot justify the purchase. So what am I to do here? Buy 10 pieces...
Yeah tried it with the 6700XT aswell. Not getting expected performance here either. So yeah I think it is a mix between PCIe scaling being worse than normal, and AMD just having _CRAP_ performance on ancient compared to NVIDIA.
So, strangely enough - I am measuring a significant performance loss in none other than CS:GO, on the map ancient. Very niché I know, but I am still taking it up with AMD right now...
I am using a X570 on the side as mentioned in OP. There is a loss of performance on ancient between G3 and G4 yes. But fx using 3DMark I get almost identical scores, which ties in correctly with every article on PCIe scaling that has been made. Something is NOT right here.
I got this part...