Recent content by PV9685

No, about 2/3rds of the performance spread over more cores. Less performance per core = less performance overall at a lot of times. It would be nice if a lot of programs were multithreaded but we are still a long ways off from that day. You seem kinda indecisive though, are you sure that you are...

That would be it - quite pitiful that the "reference" design has 500MHz DDR2 and all of the manufacturers are throwing on 400MHz chips. Mine came with Samsung chips that the datasheet on Samsung's site lists as 500MHz.. yet EVGA clocks them at 400. I am glad that this card was: A) $5 after...

Ok, so I was thinking I should try an older version of GPU-Z (Because I thought I remembered seeing it displayed correctly on an older version such as 0.4.9) So I went back a way...

Ok - quick question.. I know the G210 is slow, but for light gaming it is better than nothing. In the Wiki listing of Nvidia GPUs, the Geforce G 210 is listed as 2.356 MPixel/s and 4.712 MTexels/s of output. So of course if it were clocked at 600MHz it would be 2.4 and 4.8 respectively. Now...

Although this is an old thread, the topic is certainly not dead. I also stumbled upon it by googling "windows 7 64 bit bluescreen on sempron 140" so I assume that others with the problem may find benefit from this info. I have built two machines with Sempron 140's and both unlock. However...